Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/eer.2015.096

Application of artificial neural networks to predict total dissolved solids in the river Zayanderud, Iran  

Gholamreza, Asadollahfardi (Department of Civil Engineering, Kharazmi University)
Afshin, Meshkat-Dini (Department of Civil Engineering, Kharazmi University)
Shiva, Homayoun Aria (Department of Civil Engineering, Kharazmi University)
Nasrin, Roohani (Department of Civil Engineering, Kharazmi University)
Publication Information
Environmental Engineering Research / v.21, no.4, 2016 , pp. 333-340 More about this Journal
Abstract
An Artificial Neural Network including a Radial Basis Function (RBF) and a Time Delay Neural Network (TDNN) was used to predict total dissolved solid (TDS) in the river Zayanderud. Water quality parameters in the river for ten years, 2001-2010, were prepared from data monitored by the Isfahan Regional Water Authority. A factor analysis was applied to select the inputs of water quality parameters, which obtained total hardness, bicarbonate, chloride and calcium. Input data to the neural networks were pH, $Na^+$, $Mg^{2+}$, Carbonate ($CO{_3}^{-2}$), $HCO{_3}^{-1}$, $Cl^-$, $Ca^{2+}$ and Total hardness. For learning process 5-fold cross validation were applied. In the best situation, the TDNN contained 2 hidden layers of 15 neurons in each of the layers and the RBF had one hidden layer with 100 neurons. The Mean Squared Error and the Mean Bias Error for the TDNN during the training process were 0.0006 and 0.0603 and for the RBF neural network the mentioned errors were 0.0001 and 0.0006, respectively. In the RBF, the coefficient of determination ($R^2$) and the index of agreement (IA) between the observed data and predicted data were 0.997 and 0.999, respectively. In the TDNN, the $R^2$ and the IA between the actual and predicted data were 0.957 and 0.985, respectively. The results of sensitivity illustrated that $Ca^{2+}$ and $SO{_4}^{2-}$ parameters had the highest effect on the TDS prediction.
Keywords
Neural network; RBF; TDNN; TDS; Zayanderud;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zhang Q, Stanley SJ. Forecasting raw-water quality parameters in the North Saskatchewan River by neural network modeling. Water Res.1997;1354:72-79.
2 Huang W, Foo S. Neural network modeling of salinity variation in the Apalachicola River. Water Res. 2000;36:356-362.
3 Misaghi F, Mohammadi K. Estimating water quality changes in the Zayandeh Rud River using artificial neural network model. 2000; written for presentation at CSAE/SCGR.
4 Kanani SH, Asadollahfardi G, Ghanbari A. Application of artificial neural network to predict total dissolved solid in Achechay River basin. J. World Appl. Sci. 2008;4:646-654.
5 Nemati S, Naghipour L, Fazeli Fard MH. Artificial neural network modeling of total dissolved solid in the Simineh River, Iran. J. Civil Eng. Urban. 2014;4:8-14.
6 Moienian M. The natural landscape of the Zayandehrood River. Esfahan: Jahad Daneshgahi; 1999.
7 Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960;20:141-151.   DOI
8 Sarmad Z, Bazargan A, Hejazi A. Research methods in the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Tehran: Nshragah Institute; 1997.
9 Lapin L. Probability and statistics for modern engineering, translation: Tamuri M, Rezaeian M. 1st ed. Tehran: Univ. of Technology; 2007.
10 Johnson RA, Wichem DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis, translation: Nirumand H. Mashhad: Ferdowsi Univ.; 2007.
11 Meshkani M. Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Tehran: Univ. of Shahid Beheshti; 1992.
12 Sobhanifar Y, Kharazian M. Factor analysis, structural equation modeling and multilevel. 1st ed. Tehran: Univ. of Emam Sadegh; 2012.
13 Kia M. Neural network in MATLAB. 2nd ed. Tehran: Kian Univ. Press; 2012.
14 Mahdinejad M. The prediction of air pollution of Tehran based on artificial neural network. Master Thesis. Tehran: Univ. of Kharazmi; 2013.
15 Taherion M. Artificial neural network and its application in environmental engineering. First conference on environmental engineering. Tehran: Tehran Univ.; 2006.
16 Hornik KM, Stinchocombe M, White H. Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximator. Neural Networks 1989;2: 359-366.   DOI
17 Menhaj M. Computational intelligence, fundamentals of artificial neural networks. Vol. 1. Farsi: Amirkabir Univ. Publisher; 1998.
18 Kennedy JB, Neville AD. Basic statistical methods for engineers and scientists. 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Ro.; 1964.
19 Krause P, Boyle DP, Base F. Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv. Geosci. 2005;5:89-97.   DOI
20 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistic. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon; 2012.
21 Maier HR, Dandy GC. The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters. J. Water Resour. Res. 1996;32:1013-1022.   DOI
22 Hossaini Abari H. Zayandehrood from source to swamp. 2nd ed. Esfahan: Golha press; 2000.
23 Asadollahfardi G, Taklify A, Ghanbari A. Application of artificial neural network to predict TDS in Talkheh Rud River. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2012;138:363-370.   DOI