Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.3.165

Arsenic Removal from Water Using Various Adsorbents: Magnetic Ion Exchange Resins, Hydrous Ion Oxide Particles, Granular Ferric Hydroxide, Activated Alumina, Sulfur Modified Iron, and Iron Oxide-Coated Microsand  

Sinha, Shahnawaz (Water Desalination and Reuse Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)
Amy, Gary (Water Desalination and Reuse Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology)
Yoon, Yeo-Min (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina)
Her, Nam-Guk (Department of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Korea Army Academy at Young-Cheon)
Publication Information
Environmental Engineering Research / v.16, no.3, 2011 , pp. 165-173 More about this Journal
Abstract
The equilibrium and kinetic adsorption of arsenic on six different adsorbents were investigated with one synthetic and four natural types (two surface and two ground) of water. The adsorbents tested included magnetic ion exchange resins (MIEX), hydrous ion oxide particles (HIOPs), granular ferric hydroxide (GFH), activated alumina (AA), sulfur modified iron (SMI), and iron oxide-coated microsand (IOC-M), which have different physicochemical properties (shape, charge, surface area, size, and metal content). The results showed that adsorption equilibriums were achieved within a contact period of 20 min. The optimal doses of adsorbents determined for a given equilibrium concentration of $C_{eq}=10\;{\mu}g/L$ were 500 mg/L for AA and GFH, 520-1,300 mg/L for MIEX, 1,200 mg/L for HIOPs, 2,500 mg/L for SMI, and 7,500 mg/L for IOC-M at a contact time of 60 min. At these optimal doses, the rate constants of the adsorbents were 3.9, 2.6, 2.5, 1.9, 1.8, and 1.6 1/hr for HIOPs, AA, GFH, MIEX, SMI, and IOC-M, respectively. The presence of silicate significantly reduced the arsenic removal efficiency of HIOPs, AA, and GFH, presumably due to the decrease in chemical binding affinity of arsenic in the presence of silicate. Additional experiments with natural types of water showed that, with the exception of IOC-M, the adsorbents had lower adsorption capacities in ground water than with surface and deionized water, in which the adsorption capacities decreased by approximately 60-95%.
Keywords
Adsorbents; Arsenic removal; Ion effect; Sorption; Water treatment;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sherman DM, Randall SR. Surface complexation of arsenic(V) to iron(III) (hydr)oxides: structural mechanism from ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFS spectroscopy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2003;67:4223-4230.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Chiew H, Sampson ML, Huch S, Ken S, Bostick BC. Effect of groundwater iron and phosphate on the efficacy of arsenic removal by iron-amended biosand filters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43:6295-6300.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Meng X, Bang S, Korfiatis GP. Effects of silicate, sulfate, and carbonate on arsenic removal by ferric chloride. Water Res. 2000;34:1255-1261.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Roberts LC, Hug SJ, Ruettimann T, Billah MM, Khan AW, Rahman MT. Arsenic removal with iron(II) and iron(III) in waters with high silicate and phosphate concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003;38:307-315.
5 Giasuddin ABM, Kanel SR, Choi H. Adsorption of humic acid onto nanoscale zerovalent iron and its effect on arsenic removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:2022-2027.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Goyne KW, Zimmerman AR, Newalkar BL, Komarneni S, Brantley SL, Chorover J. Surface charge of variable porosity $Al_2O_3(s)\;and\;SiO_2(s)$ adsorbents. J. Porous Mater. 2002;9:243-256.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Clifford JD. Ion exchange and inorganic adsorption. In: Letterman RD, American Water Works Association, eds. Water quality and treatment: a handbook of community water supplies. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999.
8 Driehaus W, Jekel M, Hildebrandt U. Granular ferric hydroxide--a new adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from natural water. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 1998;47:30-35.
9 Makris KC, Sarkar D, Datta R. Evaluating a drinking-water waste by-product as a novel sorbent for arsenic. Chemosphere 2006;64:730-741.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Lin TF, Wu JK. Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate within activated alumina grains: equilibrium and kinetics. Water Res. 2001;35:2049-2057.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Vaishya RC, Gupta SK. Modeling arsenic(V) removal from water by sulfate modified iron-oxide coated sand (SMIOCS). Sep. Sci. Technol. 2004;39:645-666.
12 Vaishya RC, Gupta SK. Arsenic(V) removal by sulfate modified iron oxide-coated sand (SMIOCS) in a fixed bed column. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 2006;41:157-163.
13 Benjamin MM, Sletten RS, Bailey RP, Bennett T. Sorption and filtration of metals using iron-oxide-coated sand. Water Res. 1996;30:2609-2620.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Chang Y, Li CW, Benjamin MM. Iron oxide-coated media for NOM sorption and particulate filtration. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1997;89:100-113.
15 Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1998.
16 Ford RG. Rates of hydrous ferric oxide crystallization and the influence on coprecipitated arsenate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002;36:2459-2463.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Brandhuber P, Amy G. Arsenic removal by a charged ultrafiltration membrane--influences of membrane operating conditions and water quality on arsenic rejection. Desalination 2001;140:1-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Dixit S, Hering JG. Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003;37:4182-4189.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Banerjee K, Amy GL, Prevost M, et al. Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of adsorption of arsenic onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). Water Res. 2008;42:3371-3378.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Sperlich A, Werner A, Genz A, Amy G, Worch E, Jekel M. Breakthrough behavior of granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) fixed-bed adsorption filters: modeling and experimental approaches. Water Res. 2005;39:1190-1198.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Yoon J, Amy G, Chung J, Sohn J, Yoon Y. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes. Chemosphere 2009;77:228-235.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Singer PC, Bilyk K. Enhanced coagulation using a magnetic ion exchange resin. Water Res. 2002;36:4009-4022.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Gupta K, Ghosh UC. Arsenic removal using hydrous nanostructure iron(III)-titanium(IV) binary mixed oxide from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;161:884-892.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Gupta K, Saha S, Ghosh UC. Synthesis and characterization of nanostructure hydrous iron-titanium binary mixed oxide for arsenic sorption. J. Nanopart. Res. 2008;10:1361-1368.   DOI
25 Waychunas GA, Kim CS, Banfield JF. Nanoparticulate iron oxide minerals in soils and sediments: unique properties and contaminant scavenging mechanisms. J. Nanopart. Res. 2005;7:409-433.   DOI
26 Leupin OX, Hug SJ. Oxidation and removal of arsenic (III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron. Water Res. 2005;39:1729-1740.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Westerhoff P, Highfield D, Badruzzaman M, Yoon Y. Rapid small-scale column tests for arsenate removal in iron oxide packed bed columns. J. Environ. Eng. 2005;131:262-271.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 US Environmental Protection Agency. Arsenic in drinking water [Internet]. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; c2011 [cited 2011 Jul 22]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/safewater/arsenic/index.html.
29 Hug SJ, Leupin O. Iron-catalyzed oxidation of arsenic(III) by oxygen and by hydrogen peroxide: pH-dependent formation of oxidants in the Fenton reaction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003;37:2734-2742.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Bose P, Sharma A. Role of iron in controlling speciation and mobilization of arsenic in subsurface environment. Water Res. 2002;36:4916-4926.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Masue Y, Loeppert RH, Kramer TA. Arsenate and arsenite adsorption and desorption behavior on coprecipitated aluminum:iron hydroxides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:837-842.   DOI   ScienceOn