Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/eer.2011.16.3.149

Investigation of Al-hydroxide Precipitate Fouling on the Nanofiltration Membrane System with Coagulation Pretreatment: Effect of Inorganic Compound, Organic Compound, and Their Combination  

Choi, Yang-Hun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Konkuk University)
Kweon, Ji-Hyang (Department of Environmental Engineering, Konkuk University)
Publication Information
Environmental Engineering Research / v.16, no.3, 2011 , pp. 149-157 More about this Journal
Abstract
Nanofiltration (NF) experiments were conducted to investigate fouling of Al-hydroxide precipitate and the influence of organic compound, inorganic compound, and their combination, i.e., multiple foulants. $CaCl_2$ and $MgSO_4$ were employed as surrogates of inorganic compounds while humic acid was used as surrogate of organic compound. The flux attained from NF experiments was fitted with the mathematical fouling model to evaluate the potential fouling mechanisms. Al-hydroxide fouling with a cake formation mechanism had little effect on the NF membrane fouling regardless of the Al concentration. The NF fouling by Al-hydroxide precipitate was deteriorated in presence of inorganic matter. The effect of Mg was more critical in increasing the fouling than Ca. This is because the Mg ions enhanced the resistances of the cake layer accumulated by the Al-hydroxide precipitate on the membrane surfaces. However, the fouling with Mg was dramatically mitigated by adding humic acid. It is interesting to observe that the removal of the conductivity was enhanced to 61.2% in presence of Mg and humic acid from 30.9% with Al-hydroxide alone. The influence of dissolved matter (i.e., colloids) was more negative than particulate matter on the NF fouling for Al-hydroxide precipitate in presence of inorganic and organic matter.
Keywords
Al-hydroxide precipitate; Coagulation; Fouling; Nanofiltration;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Li Q, Elimelech M. Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:4683-4693.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Li Q, Elimelech M. Synergistic effects in combined fouling of a loose nanofiltration membrane by colloidal materials and natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;278:72-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bertsh PM. Aqueous polynuclear aluminum species. In: Sposito G, ed. The environmental chemistry of aluminum. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989. p. 107-109.
4 Balannec B, Vourch M, Rabiller-Baudry M, Chaufer B. Comparative study of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dairy effluent treatment by dead-end filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005;42:195-200.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Field RW, Wu D, Howell JA, Gupta BB. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995;100:259-272.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Jarusutthirak C, Mattaraj S, Jiraratananon R. Influence of inorganic scalants and natural organic matter on nanofiltration membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;287:138-145.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Zelazny LW, Jardine PM. Surface reactions of aqueous aluminum species. In: Sposito G, ed. The environmental chemistry of aluminum. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989. p. 149-155.
8 Manttari M, Pihlajamaki A, Nystrom M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;280:311-320.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bouranene S, Fievet P, Szymczyk A, El-Hadi Samar M, Vidonne A. Influence of operating conditions on the rejection of cobalt and lead ions in aqueous solutions by a nanofiltration polyamide membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;325:150-157.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Gabelich CJ, Ishida KP, Gerringer FW, Evangelista R, Kalyan M, Suffet IHM. Control of residual aluminum from conventional treatment to improve reverse osmosis performance. Desalination 2006;190:147-160.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Schrader GA, Zwijnenburg A, Wessling M. The effect of WWTP effluent zeta-potential on direct nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;266:80-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Choi YH, Kim HS, Kweon JH. Role of hydrophobic natural organic matter flocs on the fouling in coagulation-membrane processes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008;62:529-534.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Listiarini K, Sun DD, Leckie JO. Organic fouling of nanofiltration membranes: evaluating the effects of humic acid, calcium, alum coagulant and their combinations on the specific cake resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 2009;332:56-62.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kim HA, Choi JH, Takizawa S. Comparison of initial filtration resistance by pretreatment processes in the nanofiltration for drinking water treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007;56:354-362.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Park N, Lee S, Yoon SR, Kim YH, Cho J. Foulants analyses for NF membranes with different feed waters: coagulation/sedimentation and sand filtration treated waters. Desalination 2007;202:231-238.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Ohno K, Matsui Y, Itoh M, et al. NF membrane fouling by aluminum and iron coagulant residuals after coagulation-MF pretreatment. Desalination 2010;254:17-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Pernitsky DJ, Edzwald JK. Solubility of polyaluminium coagulants. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. Aqua 2003;52:395-406.
18 Schaep J, Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001;188:129-136.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Tanninen J, Manttari M, Nystrom M. Effect of salt mixture concentration on fractionation with NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;283:57-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Her N, Amy G, Jarusutthirak C. Seasonal variations of nanofiltration (NF) foulants: identification and control. Desalination 2000;132:143-160.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Bargeman G, Vollenbroek JM, Straatsma J, Schroen CGPH, Boom RM. Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;247:11-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Berube PR, Mavinic DS, Hall ER, Kenway SE, Roett K. Evaluation of adsorption and coagulation as membrane pretreatment steps for the removal of organic material and disinfection-by-product precursors. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002;1:465-476.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Pikkarainen AT, Judd SJ, Jokela J, Gillberg L. Pre-coagulation for microfiltration of an upland surface water. Water Res. 2004;38:455-465.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Kim HC, Hong JH, Lee S. Fouling of microfiltration membranes by natural organic matter after coagulation treatment: a comparison of different initial mixing conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;283:266-272.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Waite TD. Chemical speciation effect in nanofiltration separation. In: Schaefer AI, Fane AG, Waite TD, eds. Nanofiltration: principles and applications. Oxford: Elsevier Advanced Technology; 2007. Ch. 7. p. 166-167.
26 Park PK, Lee CH, Choi SJ, Choo KH, Kim SH, Yoon CH. Effect of the removal of DOMs on the performance of a coagulation-UF membrane system for drinking water production. Desalination 2002;145:237-245.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Lee JD, Lee SH, Jo MH, Park PK, Lee CH, Kwak JW. Effect of coagulation conditions on membrane filtration characteristics in coagulation--microfiltration process for water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000;34:3780-3788.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Oh JI, Lee S. Influence of streaming potential on flux decline of microfiltration with in-line rapid pre-coagulation process for drinking water production. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;254:39-47.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Cho MH, Lee CH, Lee S. Effect of flocculation conditions on membrane permeability in coagulation-microfiltration. Desalination 2006;191:386-396.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Jefferson B, Jarvis P, Sharp E, Wilson S, Parsons SA. Flocs through the looking glass. Water Sci. Technol. 2004;50:47-54.
31 Kilduff JE, Mattaraj S, Belfort G. Flux decline during nanofiltration of naturally-occurring dissolved organic matter: effects of osmotic pressure, membrane permeability, and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 2004;239:39-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Koyuncu I, Topacik D, Wiesner MR. Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts. Water Res. 2004;38:432-440.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Bodzek M, Koter S, Wesolowska K. Application of membrane techniques in a water softening process. Desalination 2002;145:321-327.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Lin CJ, Shirazi S, Rao P, Agarwal S. Effects of operational parameters on cake formation of $CaSO_4$ in nanofiltration. Water Res. 2006;40:806-816.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Nanda D, Tung KL, Hsiung CC, et al. Effect of solution chemistry on water softening using charged nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2008;234:344-353.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Carroll T, King S, Gray SR, Bolto BA, Booker NA. The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment. Water Res. 2000;34:2861-2868.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Hilal N, Al-Zoubi H, Darwish NA, Mohammad AW, Abu Arabi M. A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 2004;170:281-308.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Wittmann E, Thorsen T. Water treatment. In: Schaefer AI, Fane AG, Waite TD, eds. Nanofiltration: principles and applications. Oxford: Elsevier Advanced Technology; 2007. Ch. 10. p. 273-284.
39 Vickers JC, Thompson MA, Kelkar UG. The use of membrane filtration in conjunction with coagulation processes for improved NOM removal. Desalination 1995;102:57-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Lee S, Lee CH. Effect of operating conditions on $CaSO_4$ scale formation mechanism in nanofiltration for water softening. Water Res. 2000;34:3854-3866.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Tay JH, Liu J, Delai Sun D. Effect of solution physico-chemistry on the charge property of nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 2002;36:585-598.   DOI   ScienceOn