1 |
Li Q, Elimelech M. Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38:4683-4693.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Li Q, Elimelech M. Synergistic effects in combined fouling of a loose nanofiltration membrane by colloidal materials and natural organic matter. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;278:72-82.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Bertsh PM. Aqueous polynuclear aluminum species. In: Sposito G, ed. The environmental chemistry of aluminum. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989. p. 107-109.
|
4 |
Balannec B, Vourch M, Rabiller-Baudry M, Chaufer B. Comparative study of different nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dairy effluent treatment by dead-end filtration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005;42:195-200.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Field RW, Wu D, Howell JA, Gupta BB. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995;100:259-272.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Jarusutthirak C, Mattaraj S, Jiraratananon R. Influence of inorganic scalants and natural organic matter on nanofiltration membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;287:138-145.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Zelazny LW, Jardine PM. Surface reactions of aqueous aluminum species. In: Sposito G, ed. The environmental chemistry of aluminum. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989. p. 149-155.
|
8 |
Manttari M, Pihlajamaki A, Nystrom M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;280:311-320.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Bouranene S, Fievet P, Szymczyk A, El-Hadi Samar M, Vidonne A. Influence of operating conditions on the rejection of cobalt and lead ions in aqueous solutions by a nanofiltration polyamide membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;325:150-157.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Gabelich CJ, Ishida KP, Gerringer FW, Evangelista R, Kalyan M, Suffet IHM. Control of residual aluminum from conventional treatment to improve reverse osmosis performance. Desalination 2006;190:147-160.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Schrader GA, Zwijnenburg A, Wessling M. The effect of WWTP effluent zeta-potential on direct nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;266:80-93.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Choi YH, Kim HS, Kweon JH. Role of hydrophobic natural organic matter flocs on the fouling in coagulation-membrane processes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008;62:529-534.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Listiarini K, Sun DD, Leckie JO. Organic fouling of nanofiltration membranes: evaluating the effects of humic acid, calcium, alum coagulant and their combinations on the specific cake resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 2009;332:56-62.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Kim HA, Choi JH, Takizawa S. Comparison of initial filtration resistance by pretreatment processes in the nanofiltration for drinking water treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007;56:354-362.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Park N, Lee S, Yoon SR, Kim YH, Cho J. Foulants analyses for NF membranes with different feed waters: coagulation/sedimentation and sand filtration treated waters. Desalination 2007;202:231-238.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Ohno K, Matsui Y, Itoh M, et al. NF membrane fouling by aluminum and iron coagulant residuals after coagulation-MF pretreatment. Desalination 2010;254:17-22.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Pernitsky DJ, Edzwald JK. Solubility of polyaluminium coagulants. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. Aqua 2003;52:395-406.
|
18 |
Schaep J, Vandecasteele C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001;188:129-136.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Tanninen J, Manttari M, Nystrom M. Effect of salt mixture concentration on fractionation with NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;283:57-64.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Her N, Amy G, Jarusutthirak C. Seasonal variations of nanofiltration (NF) foulants: identification and control. Desalination 2000;132:143-160.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Bargeman G, Vollenbroek JM, Straatsma J, Schroen CGPH, Boom RM. Nanofiltration of multi-component feeds. Interactions between neutral and charged components and their effect on retention. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;247:11-20.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Berube PR, Mavinic DS, Hall ER, Kenway SE, Roett K. Evaluation of adsorption and coagulation as membrane pretreatment steps for the removal of organic material and disinfection-by-product precursors. J. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002;1:465-476.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Pikkarainen AT, Judd SJ, Jokela J, Gillberg L. Pre-coagulation for microfiltration of an upland surface water. Water Res. 2004;38:455-465.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Kim HC, Hong JH, Lee S. Fouling of microfiltration membranes by natural organic matter after coagulation treatment: a comparison of different initial mixing conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;283:266-272.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Waite TD. Chemical speciation effect in nanofiltration separation. In: Schaefer AI, Fane AG, Waite TD, eds. Nanofiltration: principles and applications. Oxford: Elsevier Advanced Technology; 2007. Ch. 7. p. 166-167.
|
26 |
Park PK, Lee CH, Choi SJ, Choo KH, Kim SH, Yoon CH. Effect of the removal of DOMs on the performance of a coagulation-UF membrane system for drinking water production. Desalination 2002;145:237-245.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Lee JD, Lee SH, Jo MH, Park PK, Lee CH, Kwak JW. Effect of coagulation conditions on membrane filtration characteristics in coagulation--microfiltration process for water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000;34:3780-3788.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Oh JI, Lee S. Influence of streaming potential on flux decline of microfiltration with in-line rapid pre-coagulation process for drinking water production. J. Membr. Sci. 2005;254:39-47.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Cho MH, Lee CH, Lee S. Effect of flocculation conditions on membrane permeability in coagulation-microfiltration. Desalination 2006;191:386-396.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Jefferson B, Jarvis P, Sharp E, Wilson S, Parsons SA. Flocs through the looking glass. Water Sci. Technol. 2004;50:47-54.
|
31 |
Kilduff JE, Mattaraj S, Belfort G. Flux decline during nanofiltration of naturally-occurring dissolved organic matter: effects of osmotic pressure, membrane permeability, and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 2004;239:39-53.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Koyuncu I, Topacik D, Wiesner MR. Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts. Water Res. 2004;38:432-440.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Bodzek M, Koter S, Wesolowska K. Application of membrane techniques in a water softening process. Desalination 2002;145:321-327.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Lin CJ, Shirazi S, Rao P, Agarwal S. Effects of operational parameters on cake formation of in nanofiltration. Water Res. 2006;40:806-816.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Nanda D, Tung KL, Hsiung CC, et al. Effect of solution chemistry on water softening using charged nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2008;234:344-353.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Carroll T, King S, Gray SR, Bolto BA, Booker NA. The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment. Water Res. 2000;34:2861-2868.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Hilal N, Al-Zoubi H, Darwish NA, Mohammad AW, Abu Arabi M. A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 2004;170:281-308.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Wittmann E, Thorsen T. Water treatment. In: Schaefer AI, Fane AG, Waite TD, eds. Nanofiltration: principles and applications. Oxford: Elsevier Advanced Technology; 2007. Ch. 10. p. 273-284.
|
39 |
Vickers JC, Thompson MA, Kelkar UG. The use of membrane filtration in conjunction with coagulation processes for improved NOM removal. Desalination 1995;102:57-61.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Lee S, Lee CH. Effect of operating conditions on scale formation mechanism in nanofiltration for water softening. Water Res. 2000;34:3854-3866.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Tay JH, Liu J, Delai Sun D. Effect of solution physico-chemistry on the charge property of nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 2002;36:585-598.
DOI
ScienceOn
|