Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4491/eer.2005.10.6.306

IDENTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE MERCURY SOURCES AND ESTIMATION OF MERCURY WET DEPOSITION FLUX IN LAKE ONTARIO FROM LAKE ONTARIO ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION STUDY (LOADS)  

Han, Young-Ji (Department of Environmental Science, College of Natural Science, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Environmental Engineering Research / v.10, no.6, 2005 , pp. 306-315 More about this Journal
Abstract
Total gas phase mercury (TGM) concentrations and event wet-only precipitation for Hg were collected for nine months (from April, 2002 to Dec., 2002) at Sterling, NY on the shoreline of Lake Ontario. TGM concentrations measured in this study ($3.02{\pm}2.14\;ng/m^3$) were in somewhat high range compared to other background sites. Using simplified quantitative transport bias analysis (SQTBA) possible sources affecting high Hg concentration in Sterling was identified, and they are coal-fired power plants located in southern NY and Pennsylvania. Wet deposition measured at Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) sites including Pt. Petre and Egbert, ON were compared with data obtained at the Sterling to estimate the total mercury wet deposition flux to Lake Ontario. The wet deposition flux was calculated to be the highest at the Sterling site ($7.94\;{\mu}g/m^2$ from April, 2002 to Dec. 2002) and the lowest at the Egbert ($3.92\;{\mu}g/m^2$), due to the both the difference in precipitation depth and Hg concentration in the precipitation. The deposition measured at the Sterling site is similar to Lake Michigan deposition of $6-14\;{\mu}g/m^2$ (converted for ninth months) measured for Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study (LMMBS).
Keywords
Mercury; TGM; RGM; SQTBA; Source; Wet deposition; Lake Ontario;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Booty, W. G., Resler, O., and McCrimmon, C., 'Mass balance modeling of priority toxic chemicals within the great lakes toxic chemical decision support system: RateCon model results for Lake Ontario and Lake Erie,' Environ. Modelling & Software, 20, 671-688 (2005)   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Cass, G. R., 'Sulfate air quality control strategy design,' Atmos. Environ., 15, 1227-1239 (1981)   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Draxler, R. R. and Taylor, A. D., 'Horizontal dispersion parameters for long-range transport modeling,' J. Appl. Meteorol., 21, 367-372 (1982)   DOI
4 Keeler, G. J. and Landis, M. S., 'Lake Michigan Mass Balance Methods Compendium; Standard operating procedure for analysis of vapor phase mercury,' http://www.epa.gov/grtlakes/Immb/methods/Imanasvp.pdf (1994)
5 Lamb, R. G. and Seinfeld, J. H., 'Mathematical modeling of urban air pollution-General theory,' Environ. Sci. Technol., 7, 253-261 (1973)   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lamborg, C. H., Fitzgerald, W. F., Vandal, G. M. and Rolfhux, K. R., Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 80, 189-198 (1995)   DOI
7 Landis, M. S. and Keeler, G. J., 'Atmospheric mercury deposition to Lake Michigan during the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study,' Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4518-4524 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Landis, M. S., Vette, A. F., and Keeler, G. J., 'Atmospheric mercury In the Lake Michigan Basin: Influence of the Chicago/ Gary urban area,' Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4508-4517 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
9 National Wildlife Federation, 'Cycle of harm: Mercury's pathway from rain to fish in the environment,' Great Lakes Natural Resource Center, Greatlakes@nwf.org (2003)
10 Polissar, A. V., Hopke, P. K., and Harris, J. M., 'Source regions for atmospheric aerosol measured at Barrow, Alaska,' Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4214-4226 (2001a)   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Samson, P. 1., 'Trajectory analysis of summertime sulfate concentrations in the Northeastern United States,' J. Appl. Meteolrol., 19, 1382-1394 (1980)   DOI
12 U.S. EPA, 'Locating and estimating air emissions from sources of mercury and mercury compounds (Mercury L & E),' Final draft report, EPA-454/R-97-0121997, Research Triangle Park, NC (1997b)
13 Schroeder, W. H. and Munthe, J., 'Atmospheric mercury - An overview,' Atmos. Environ., 32(5), 809-822 (1998)   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hoyer, M., Burke, J., and Keeler, G. J., Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 80, 199-208 (1995)   DOI
15 Draxler, R. R. and Hess, G. D., 'Description of the HYSPLIT 4 modeling system,' NOAA Technical Memorandum, ERL ARL-224 (1997) (Revised: August 1998, September 2002)
16 Han, Y. J., 'Mercury in New York State; Concentrations and source identification using Hybrid receptor modeling,' Ph. D. Thesis, Clarkson University (2003)
17 Ryan, R., 'Point, area, and mobile sources of mercury prepared for U.S. EPA analysis of proposed multi-pollutant Power Generation Legislation,' U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division, Emissions Factors and Inventory Group, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (2001)
18 Han, Y. J., Holsen, T. M., Hopke, P. K., Vi, S. M., Pagano, J., Milligan, M., Lai, S. O., Liu, W., Falanga, L., and Andolina, C., 'Atmospheric gaseous mercury concentrations in New York State: relationships with meteorological data and other pollutants,' Atmos. Environ., 38, 6431-6446 (2004)   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Keeler, G. J. 'A hybrid approach for source apportionment of atmospheric pollutants in the Northeastern united States,' Ph. D. Thesis, University of Michigan (1987)
20 Polissar, A. V., Hopke, P. K., and Poirot, R. L., 'Atmospheric aerosol over Vermont: chemical composition and sources,' Environ. Sci. Tehcnol., 35, 4604-4621 (2001b)   DOI   ScienceOn
21 U.S. EPA, 'Mercury study report to Congress,' Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development, EPA-452/R-97-005, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1997a)
22 Vette, A. F., Landis, M. S., and Keeler, G. J., 'Deposition and emission of gaseous mercury to and from Lake Michigan during the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study (July, 1994 - October, 1995),' Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4525-4532 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn