Browse > Article

Characteristics of Community Life in Foreign Intentional Communities Focus on the Differences between Ecovillage and Cohousing  

Choi, Jung-Shin (Department of Consumer & Housing Studies, The Catholic University of Korea)
Publication Information
International Journal of Human Ecology / v.9, no.2, 2008 , pp. 93-105 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigates the different characteristics (mainly of community life) in representative intentional communities, between the ecovillage and cohousing, since the different purpose of the establishment of the community might result different characteristics. The study method is data analysis: the analysis material is Community Directory, A Comprehensive Guide to Intentional Communities and Cooperative Living (Rutledge, 2005). Of 750 listed communities, 397 (211 ecovillages and 186 cohousings) communities were analyzed. The findings of the study reveal that there are clear differences of community life between ecovillages and cohousings even though two communities are regarded as similar intentional communities. The similarities between the two communities are as follows: 1) Those mostly distributed in the USA, and established before 2000. 2) Dominant size of intentional communities is less than 20 residents and 20 houses. 3) They make decisions in consensus. 4) They eat together very frequently; at least once a week or more. 5) Shared work is required. The differences between the two communities are as follows: 1) They have different aims of establishment. For instance, ecovillage focus more on eco-living, while cohousing focuses more on the cohousing idea. 2) There are more female residents in cohousings than in ecovillages. 3) There are more cohousings in urban areas with a smaller area of land, contrary to that there are more ecovillages in rural areas with larger areas of land. 4) There are less identified leaders or leadership core groups in cohousing than in ecovillages. 5) Income sharing is more common in ecovillages than in cohousings. According to there findings, it is evident that a different purpose of establishment result in different characteristics of community life even though those belong to the similar category of the intentional community. Thus, it is recommended to adapt the correct characteristics that fit the aim of the community in the establishment an intentional community Topics and discussions about establishing intentional Topics and discussions abut establishing intentional communities could contribute to gather the intentional communities could contribute to gather the interests communities could contribute to gather the interests of residents as well as those of relevant civil-workers and administrators in Korea.
Keywords
intentional community; ecovillage; cohousing; resident participation; common meal; common activity; decision making;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ambrose, I. (1993). Etablering af seniorbofaellesskaber, Erfaringer frfaringer projecker I Odense. Statens Byggeforskningsinstitu, Copenhagen Denmark
2 Choi, J. S. (2001). A case study of environmental movement and development of ecological architecture in Sweden. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 17(4)
3 Choi, J. S. (2008). Actual condition and characteristics of residents' participation of intentional communities in Korea. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 19(5), 93-102   과학기술학회마을
4 McCamant, Kathlyn, & Durrett, Charles (2003). Cohousing: A contemporary approach to housing ourselves (2nd ed.). Canada: Ten Speed Press
5 Melzer, Graham (2005). Sustainable community, learning from the cohousing model. Canada: Trafford
6 Kwak, Y. M., Cho, J. H., & Choi, J. S. (2005). A case study of ecovillage in vauban housing estate, Freibrug, Germany. Paper presented at the second annual conference of Korean Housing Institute, Seoul
7 Cho, J. H., Lee, D. S., Kwak, Y. M., & Choi, J. S. (2008). A Case study of residents' participation and common activities of intentional community in Korea, - Mindlre Community-. Paper presented at ENHR International Conference, July 06-09, Dublin Ireland
8 Kozeny, G. (2007). In community intentionally, communities directory, a comprehensive guide to intentional communities and cooperative living. Rutledge, Missouri USA
9 Christian, D. L. (2003). Creating a life together, practical tools to grow ecovillages and intentional communities. New Society Publishers. Canada
10 Walker, L. (2006). Itaca ecovillage. (Lee, Kyunga, Trarns.). Seoul: Hwangso-guleum
11 FIC. (2005). Communities directory, a comprehensive guide to intentional communities and cooperative living (4th ed.). Rutledge, Missouri
12 Jensen, S. P. (1994). Summary and conclusions of the conference on cohousing for senior citizens in Europe. BIC, Copenhagen Denmark
13 Dwelling Research Group (2000). Cohousing in the world: Dwelling with neighbors. Seoul: Kyomunsa
14 Wann, D. (2005). Reinventing community. Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing
15 Lowe, Ian (2005). Foreword, in sustainable community, learning from the cohousing model, by Meltzer, Graham. Canada: Trafford
16 Choi, J. S., & P, Jan (2006). Planning and implication of senior cohousing projects in Scandinavian countries. Seoul: Jipmundang
17 Jeon, Hosang (2007). On the spatial organization of intentional community. Doctoral dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul
18 Kwak, Y. M. (2008). A common house plan in eco-friendly village for revitalization of community. Doctoral dissertation, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul
19 Christian, D. L. (2007). Finding community, how to join an ecovillage or intentional community. New Society Publishers. Canada
20 Choi, J. S. (2007). Analysis of intentional communities in foreign countries -In reference to cohousing community-. Paper presented at the 2nd annual conference of Korean association of home management, Seoul, Korea