Browse > Article

Effect of Attentiveness in Purchase behavior and Consumer Knowledge on use of unit Price Information  

Kim Heaseon (Dept. of Consumer and Family-Child Studies, Sunchon National University)
Kim Bo-Geum (The Korea Housewives club Association, Chonbuk Division)
Publication Information
International Journal of Human Ecology / v.5, no.2, 2004 , pp. 81-91 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate consumer use of unit price information introduced in Korea 1999. A total of 571 observations were analyzed by frequency, percent, and paired t-test using SPSS. The main findings are (1) consumers use unit price information to make better purchase decisions, (2) consumers with higher than average attentiveness in purchase behavior utilize unit price information to make better buying decisions, and (3) consumers with higher than average knowledge utilize unit price information to make better buying decisions. (4) Also if either attentiveness in purchase behavior or consumer knowledge is lower than average, unit price information helped consumers make better purchase decisions. (5) However, there was no difference among those consumers with below average or above average attentiveness and knowledge.
Keywords
unit pricing; attentiveness in purchase behavior; consumer knowledge;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Creyer, Elizabeth H. and William T. Ross, Jr.(1997). 'Tradeoffs between Price and Quality: How a Value Index Affects Preference Formation,' J. of Consumer Affairs, 31(2), 280-302   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Russo, J. Edward, Gene Krieser, and Salla Miyashita (1975). 'An Effect Display of Unit Price Information,' J. of Marketing, 39(April), 11-19   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Nelson, Phillip (1970). 'Information and Consumer Behavior,' J. of Polotical Economy, 78, 311-329   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Korea Consumer Protection Board (1996). Problem in unit price information display and suggestion for improvement, Exchange Improvement 96-18: Korea Consumer Protection Board, Korea
5 Bettman, James R. (1975). 'Issues in Designig Consumer Information Environments,' J. of Consumer Research, 2(3), 169-177   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Hwang, Duck-soon, Mi-Ra Kim, and Eun-sil Hong(1999). 'The Causal Relationship of Homemakers' Consumer Function and Related Variables,' Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 13(3), 131-143
7 McCullough, T. D. and D. I. Padberg (1971). 'Unit Pricing in Supermarkets: Alternatives, Costs and Consumer Reaction,' Search: Agriculture, Cornell University, 1(6)
8 McElroy, Bruce F. and David A. Aaker (1979). 'Unit Pricing Six Years After Introduction,' J. of Retailing, 55(3), 44-57
9 Lee, Kee-choon, and In-sook Song (1988). 'PriceQuality Correlations Through Consumer Product Testing Information,' Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 6(2), 53-65
10 Kwon, Mi-Wha, and Kee-chun Rhee (2000). 'Variables Affecting on the Rationality of Consumption Behavior of Adolescent Consumers,' Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 18(2), 175-190
11 Maynes, E. S. and Assum T. (1982). 'Informationally Imperfect Consumer Market: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications,' J. of Consumer Affairs, 16,62-87   DOI
12 Lenahan, R.J., J.A. Thomas, D.A. Taylor, D.L. Call, and D.I Padberg (1972). 'Consumer Reaction to Nutrition Information on Food Product Labels,' Search Agriculture, 2(15), Cornell University
13 Seo, Jung-Hee (1993). Consumer Sovereignty, Ulsan: University of Ulsan: University of Ulsan Press.
14 Kim, Seng-Taek (1999). '10 Million Fine if Unit Price Isn't Displayed,' The Korea Economic Daily, 1999, July 7th, 17
15 Lee, Jong-In (1999). 'Use of Discout Store and Consumers' Attitude About It, 'Korea Consumer Protection Board Research Report 99-01