Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2022.10.3.164

Protection Motivation Theory and Environmental Health Behaviors: A Systematic Mapping  

Kim, Hyun Kyoung (Department of Nursing, Kongju National University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology / v.10, no.3, 2022 , pp. 164-173 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the themes and parameters of environmental health behaviors based on Rogers' protection motivation theory through a systematic mapping review. Using a systematic approach, a literature review was conducted of articles that adopted Rogers' protection motivation theory. A total of 11 articles on protection motivation theory using participants and environmental health as outcomes were identified in a search of CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Eric, PsycARTICLES, PubMed, and RISS between September 1 and September 8, 2021. Themes related to the environment and personal behaviors between 2002 and 2021 were extracted. The parameters based on protection motivation theory were identified through systematic mapping as fear appraisal, rewards of maladaptive response, severity, vulnerability, costs of adaptive response, response efficacy, self-efficacy, and intention. Self-efficacy and response efficacy considerably affected environmental health behaviors. Emotional fear appeal related to environmental hazards motivates an internal process that alters the threat appraisal and their coping appraisal. Environmental behavior perception and intention influenced on environmental health behaviors with small effect sizes. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the severity of environmental health issues could lead to the development of helpful, effective, and intensive interventions to promote healthcare among the vulnerable population.
Keywords
Fear; Health behavior; Review; Motivation; Coping;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 National Environmental Health Association (NEHA), Definitions of environmental health. https://www.neha.org/about-neha/definitions-environmental-health.
2 M.R. Thompson, and D. Schwartz Barcott, "The concept of exposure in environmental health for nursing," Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 73, No. 6, pp. 1315-1330, September 2017. doi.org/10.1111/jan.13246.   DOI
3 R.W. Rogers, Cognitive and physiological processes in attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation, Guilford Press, pp. 153-176, 1983.
4 J.E. Maddux, and R.W. Rogers, "Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change," Journal of Experimental Society Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 469-479, August 1983. doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9   DOI
5 L.F. Salazar, R.A. Crosb, S.M. Noar, A.M. Schipani-McLaughlin, and R.J. DiClemente, Health behavior theory for public health: principles, foundations, and applications. Jones & Bartlett Learning, pp. 73-93, 2019.
6 K. Glanz, B.K. Rier, and K. Viswanath, Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, Jossey-Bass, pp. 175-117, 2008.
7 H.K. Kim, and H.K. Kim, "Development and validation of women's environmental health scales in Korea: severity, susceptibility, response efficacy, self-efficacy, benefit, barrier, personal health behavior, and community health behavior scales," Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 153-165, June 2021. doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.06.21   DOI
8 S. Kim, S.H. Jeong, and Y. Hwang, "Predictors of pro-environmental behaviors of American and Korean students: The application of the Theory of Reasoned Action and Protection Motivation Theory," Science Communication, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 168-199, April 2013. doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441692   DOI
9 K.L. James, N.P. Randall, and N.R. Haddaway, "A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences," Environmental Evidence, Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 1-13, April 2016. doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6   DOI
10 T.Y. Lee, "The effects of emotional factors on environment behaviors-comparing the protective motivation theory with the ERB-based tentative model," The Environmental Education, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 18-30, June 2002.
11 K. Krieger, R. Amlot, and M.B. Rogers, "Understanding public responses to chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear incidents-driving factors, emerging themes and research gaps," Environmental International, Vol. 72, No. 66-74, May 2014. doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.017   DOI
12 K. Petersen, S. Vakkalanka, and L. Kuzniarz, "Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update," Information and Software Technology, Vol. 64, pp. 1-18, March 2015. doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007.   DOI
13 H.K. Kim, "Development and validation of the pro-environmental behavior scale for women's health," Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 1235-1244, June 2017. doi.org/10.1111/jan.13233   DOI
14 A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change," Psychology Review, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 191-215, August 1977. doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191   DOI
15 S. Milne, P. Sheeran, and S. Orbel, "Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: A meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory," Journal of Applied Society Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 106-143, October 2000. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02308.x   DOI
16 C. Park, and S.W. Lee, "A study of the user privacy protection behavior in online environment: based on protection motivation theory," Journal of Computing and Services, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 59-71, April 2014.10.7472/JKSII.2014.15.2.59   DOI
17 P. Janmaimool, "Application of Protection Motivation Theory to investigate sustainable waste management behaviors," Sustainability, Vol. 9, pp. 1079, June 2017. doi.org/10.3390/su9071079   DOI
18 M.J. Grant, and A. Booth, "A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies," Health Information and Libraries Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 91-108, March 2009. doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x   DOI
19 R.W. Rogers, "A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change," The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp. 93-114, July 1975. doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803   DOI
20 G. Liobikiene, and A. Minelgaite, "Energy and resource-saving behaviours in European Union countries: The Campbell paradigm and goal framing theory approaches," The Science the Total Environment, Vol. 750, pp. 141745, August 2021. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141745   DOI
21 A. Shafiei, and H. Maleksaeidi, "Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory," Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 22, e00908, June 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908   DOI
22 Y. Cha, and J. Cho, "A social-cognitive model of applying RISP and HBM model for Korean internet users' behavioral intentions regarding fine-dust risk protection; The role of information exposure, subjective norms, negative emotions, and risk perception," Korean Journal of Journalism and Community Studies, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 96-142, December 2019. doi.org/kjjcs.2019.63.6.003   DOI
23 G.H. Jeong, and H.K. Kim, "Pro-environmental health behavior and educational needs among pregnant women: A cross-sectional survey," Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 76, No. 7, pp. 1638-1646, March 2020. doi.org/10.1111/jan.14346   DOI
24 H.K. Kim, "Development and assessment of an instrument measuring environmental health perception and behavior toward reproductive health of female adolescents," Japan Journal of Nursing Science, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 1235-1244, May 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12347   DOI
25 D.L. Floyd, S. Prentice-Dunn, and R.W. Rogers, "A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory," Journal of Applied Society Psychology, Vol. 30, No.2, pp. 407-429, July 2000. doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x   DOI