Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2021.9.3.112

The Complementizer That-Deletion in English  

Kim, Yangsoon (Dept. of English Language and Literature, Hanbat National Univ.)
Publication Information
International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology / v.9, no.3, 2021 , pp. 112-116 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this study is to analyze the complementizer that-deletion in embedded complement clauses in English. This paper is concerned with the alternation between the overt that-complementizer and the zero complementizer by the complementizer deletion (C-deletion or that-deletion) in constructions with a nominal complement that-clause, i.e. [VP Verb [CP that-TP]]. In this paper, we compare that-complementation and zero-complementation in a diachronic grammaticalization and corpus, and show that the complementizer that has its origin in pronouns diachronically and finally becomes to form a C-head of the functional category CP. We provide the syntactic and semantic explanation on the optionality of that-deletion while answering the question why and how that-deletion is getting increasing in use especially with the verb, think, in the informal contexts. With the major causes for the currently increasing use of that-deletion, we are concerned with the contexts in which the overt complementizers or the covert complementizers are preferred.
Keywords
Complementizer; That-Complementation; Zero-Complementation; that-Deletion; Grammaticalization;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 D. Kolbe. Complement Clauses in British English. Ph.D Dissertation, University of Trier, 2008.
2 E. Finegan & D. Biber. "That and Zero Complementizers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650-1990." In B. Aarts & C. Meyer (eds.), The Verb in Contemporary English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241-257, 1985.
3 A. Sorace. "Selective Optionality in Language Development." In L. Cornips and K. Corrigan, (eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 55-80, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.265.04sor
4 Y. Kim. "The English Cause-Focused Causal Construction." IJACT 8.4, pp.161-166, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2020.8.4.161   DOI
5 R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. A Grammar of Contemporary English, London: Longman, 1972.
6 J. Grimshaw. "The Best Clitic: Constraint Conflict in Morphosyntax." In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: A Handbook in Generative Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp.169-196, 1997. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5420-84
7 R. Torres Cacoullos & J. Walker. "On the Persistence of Grammar in Discourse Formulas: A Variationist Study of That." Linguistics 47, pp.1-43, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.001   DOI
8 M. Palander-Collin. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique, 1999.
9 I. Roberts & A. Roussou. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI:10.1515/BGSL.2007.469
10 S. Tagliamonte & J. Smith. "No Momentary Fancy! The Zero Complementizer in English Dialects." English Language and Linguistics, 9(2), pp. 289-309, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1360674305001644   DOI
11 S. Thompson & A. Mulac. "A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English." In E. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Volume II, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 313-329, 1991b. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.16tho
12 J. Limber. "The Genesis of Complex Sentences." In T. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, New York: Academic Press, pp. 169-185, 1973.
13 M. Rissanen. "On the History of that Zero in Object Clause Links in English." In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, London: Longman, pp.272-289, 1991.
14 S. Thompson & A. Mulac. "The Discourse Conditions for the Use of the Complementizer That in Conversational English." Journal of Pragmatics 15, pp. 237-251, 1991a.   DOI