Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2020.8.4.161

The English Cause-Focused Causal Construction  

Kim, Yangsoon (Dept. of English Language and Literature, Hanbat National Univ.)
Publication Information
International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology / v.8, no.4, 2020 , pp. 161-166 More about this Journal
Abstract
The primary aim of this paper is to analyze the resultative adjunct clause, i.e., (thus/thereby/hence) ~ing participle and provide explicit syntactic, semantic and sociolinguistic explanation on the question what causes the cause-focused causal construction with resultative (thus/thereby/hence) ~ing participle in English. What comes first is either cause or effect clause. This study explores the recent style shift of causal constructions from the effect-focused pattern to the cause-focused pattern. In this study, we argue that the increasing number of the cause-focused main clause with a resultative ~ing participle clause shows the process of the style evolution improving speech/wring style in many respects including syntactic simplification, clarification of the sentence meaning with impact on the focused clauses, and improvement of the flow of speech/writing. The style shift found in the English resultative adjunct clauses, i.e., (thus/hence/thereby) ~ing participle constructions prove to be the style evolution from syntactic, semantic and sociolinguistic point of views.
Keywords
Style Evolution; Cause-Focused Causal Construction; Resultative Adjunct Clause; (Thus/Hence/Thereby) ~ing Participle Clause;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Y. Kim, "Syntactic Structure of English Split Infinitives from the Perspectives of Grammaticalization and Corpus," JCCT 6.3, pp. 245-251, 2020. http://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.3.245   DOI
2 A. Bell, "Language Style as Audience Design," Language in Society, 13, pp. 145-204, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X   DOI
3 P.W. Holland, Which Comes First, Cause or Effect?, New Jersey: Wiley Publication, 1986.
4 C. Claridge and T. Walker, "Clausal Clauses in Written and Speech-Related Genres in Early Modern English," ICAME Journal, No.25, pp.31-58, 2001.
5 S. Vandepitte, A Pragmatic Study of the Expression and the Interpretation of Causality: Conjuncts and Conjunctions in Modern Spoken British English. Brussel: Paleis der Academien, 1993.
6 R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. 1985.
7 M. Rissanen, "The Conjunction for in Early Modern English," Nowele 14: 3-18, 1989. http://doi.org/10.1075/NOWELE.14.01RIS   DOI
8 B. Altenberg, "Causal Linking in Spoken and Written English," Studia Linguistica, 38, pp.20-69, 1984. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.1984.tb00734.x   DOI
9 D. Biber, S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad & E. Finegan. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 1999.
10 D. Embick, "On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English," Linguistic Inquiry, 35.3, pp.355-392, 2004.   DOI
11 K. Killie, "Internal and External Factors in Language Change: Present Participle Converbs in English and Norwegian," Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 107, pp.447-469, 2006.