Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2020.8.1.44

Nursing students' and instructors' perception of simulation-based learning  

Lee, Ji Young (Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Park, Sunah (Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology / v.8, no.1, 2020 , pp. 44-55 More about this Journal
Abstract
The degree of mutual understanding between nursing students and instructors regarding simulation-based education remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the subjectivity of nursing students and instructors about simulation-based learning, and was intended to expand the mutual understand by employing the co-orientation model. Q-methodology was used to identify the perspectives of 46 nursing students and 38 instructors. Perception types found among students in relation to simulation-based learning were developmental training seekers, instructor-dependent seekers, and learning achievement seekers. The instructors estimated the student perception types as passive and dependent, positive commitment, demanding role as facilitators, and psychological burden. Perception types found among instructors included nursing capacity enhancement seekers, self-reflection seekers, and reality seekers. The students classified the instructors' perception types as nursing competency seekers, learning reinforcement seekers, and debriefing-oriented seekers. As a result of the analysis of these relations in the co-orientation model, instructors identified psychological burden and passive and dependent cognitive frameworks among students; however, these were not reported in the students' perspectives. Likewise, the reality seekers type found among the perception types of instructors was not identified by the students. These findings can help develop and implement simulation-based curricula aimed at maximizing the learning effect of nursing students.
Keywords
co-orientation; faculty; perception; Q-methodology; simulation; student;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Korean Nurse Association. The Korean nurse. http://webzine.koreanurse.or.kr/Webzine2014/read_article.php?webzine_id=46&sub_cat_id=464&is_sub_no=791&article_id=1036.
2 Korea Accreditation Board of Nursing. Criteria for evaluation of nursing educational program. http://www.kabone.or.kr/kabon02/index04.php.
3 P. Jeffries, “A framework for designing, implementing and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing,” Nursing Education Perspective, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 96-103, 2005.
4 J. Ashley, and K. Stamp, “Learning to think like a nurse: The development of clinical judgment in nursing students,” The Journal of Nursing Education, Vol. 53, No. 9, pp. 519-525, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140821-14.   DOI
5 M. Costello, K. Prelack, J. Faller, J. Huddleston, S. and Adly, J. "Doolin, Student experiences of interprofessional simulation: Findings from a qualitative study," Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 95-97, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1356810.   DOI
6 J. Kim, N. Heo, and H. Min, “Instructor's experience on nursing simulation education,” Journal of Korea Society for Simulation in Nursing, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 9-20, 2014.
7 J. Landeen, J. Pierazzo, N. Akhtar-Danesh, P. Baxter, S. van Eijk, and C. Evers, “Exploring student and faculty perceptions of clinical simulation: A Q-sort study,” Journal of Nursing Education, Vol. 54, No. 9, pp. 485-491, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150814-02   DOI
8 O. Lestander, N. Lehto, and A. Engstrom, "Nursing students' perceptions of learning after high fidelity simulation: Effects of a three-step post-simulation reflection model," Nurse Education Today, Vol. 40, pp. 219-224, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.011.   DOI
9 B. Parsh, “Characteristics of effective simulated clinical experience instructors: Interviews with undergraduate nursing students,” Journal of Nursing Education, Vol. 49, No. 10, pp. 569-572, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20100730-04.   DOI
10 J.B. Paige, and K.H. Morin, “Using Q-methodology to reveal nurse educators' perspectives about simulation design,” Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 11-19, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.09.010.   DOI
11 E.J. Yeun, H.Y. Bang, E.N. Ryoo, and E.H. Ha, "Attitudes toward learning in nursing students: An application of Q methodology," Nurse Education Today, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 1062-1068, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.02.008.   DOI
12 S. Watts, and P. Stenner, “Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 67-91, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa.   DOI
13 T. Webler, S. Danielson, and S. Tuler, "Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research.", Social and Environmental Research Institute, 2009. http://www.seri-us.org/sites/default/files/Qprimer.pdf
14 N. Akhtar-Danesh, A. Baumann, and L. Cordingley, “Q-methodology in nursing research: A promising method for the study of subjectivity,” Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 759-773, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945907312979.   DOI
15 J. Zhang, “Perceptions of simulation-assisted teaching among baccalaureate nursing students in Chinese context: Benefits, process and barriers,” Journal of Professional Nursing, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 305-310, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.12.002.   DOI
16 R. Stainton Rogers, Q methodology. In J.A. Smith, R. Harre, L.V. Langenhove (Eds), Rethinking methods in psychology, Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 178-192, 1995.
17 J.M. McLeod, and S.H. Chaffee, “Interpersonal approaches to communication research,” American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 469-499, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427301600402.   DOI
18 E.Y. Yeom, "The perception types of nursing students in team-based simulation learning: An application of QMethodology," Journal of Korean Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Vol. 32, pp. 27-47, 2016.
19 H. Shin, and K. Shim, “Nursing students’ experience on pediatric nursing simulation,” Journal of East-West Nursing Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 147-155, 2010.
20 K. Wotton, J. Davis, D. Button, and M. Kelton, “Third-year undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of highfidelity simulation,” Journal of Nursing Education, Vol. 49, No. 11, pp. 632-639, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20100831-01.   DOI
21 W. Choi, O. Dyens, T. Chan, M. Schijven, S. Lajoie, M.E. Mancini, P. Dev, L. Fellander-Tsai, M. Ferland, P. Kato, J. Lau, M. Montonaro, J. Pineau, and R. Aggarwal, "Engagement and learning in simulation: recommendations of the Simnovate Engaged Learning Domain Group," BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 3, No. Suppl 1, pp. S23-S32, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000177.   DOI
22 M.L. Frazier, S. Fainshmidt, R.L. Klinger, A. Pezeshkan, and V. Vracheva, “Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 113-165, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183.   DOI
23 Y.S. Roh, J. Ahn, E. Kim, and J. Kim, "Effects of prebriefing on psychological safety and learning outcomes," Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Vol. 25, pp. 12-19, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.10.001.   DOI
24 J.W. Rudolph, D.B. Raemer, and R. Simon, “Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: The role of the presimulation briefing,” Simulation in Healthcare, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 339-349, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047.   DOI