Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2019.7.4.63

A Study on the Substantial impact of US high rate tariff policy on the Korean companies -Based on analysis of Article 301 of the US Trade Law -  

Nam, Seon Mo (Dept. of Law, Semyung university)
Publication Information
International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology / v.7, no.4, 2019 , pp. 63-68 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, the United States and China have declared a 25% retaliatory tariff for the partner country products of 50 billion dollar scale. "Trade war" is getting full swing. Such conflicts between economic powers may spread to Japan like the domino phenomenon following the EU (European Union) and become bigger in the global trade war. As a result, Korea has an economic system with a high degree of external dependence, and there is an expert's analysis that it will become the largest victim of the global trade war. If the WTO Dispute Settlement Authority approves this US 301 retaliation measure in the same way as the past case (US-EU hormone-treated beef imports), the United States will not import any Chinese imported products Chinese products) can be imposed. If the US launches a special 301 or super 301, which is stronger than the regular 301, then China is very likely to enforce US retaliation against it, and the trade war between the two countries could become a reality. This phenomenon is likely to have a negative impact on Korean companies. In particular, Korea, which is highly reliant on intermediate goods exports to China, is expected to suffer a great deal of damage. Therefore, Korea needs flexible response at home and abroad, it is necessary to enhance the autonomy of companies and protect export industries. Adjusting corporate tax rate as well as domestic industry height will be one way. The long-term (21 months) trade war between the United States and China has resulted in economic uncertainty. The resulting damage must be compensated. It is necessary to prepare the compensation through the economic council between countries. In the future, the punitive damage compensation system should be introduced.
Keywords
High rate tariffs; Retaliatory Duty; Article 301 of Trade Law; trade war; Protection Trade; Trade Expansion Act Article 232;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim Si Ra.Kim Eun Mi, A Study on the Application FTA's Domestic Policy : Focusing on the Nudge Technique, The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, Vol. 18. No. 4, December 2017, p.137.
2 Yu, Byung-gyu, Industrial Impacts and Response Strategies of Trump Economic Policy, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, The 2nd Sejong Policy Fellowship, 2017.4.11..p.12
3 Park Hong Gyue.Park Sang Tae, A Study on the Countermeasures for the Possible Renegotiation of the Korea-US FTA-Focused on the Tariffs Policies-, The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, Vol. 18. No. 1, February 2017, p.122.
4 Conclusion of US-China Trade Phase 1. https://www.voakorea.com.., 2019.12.17. Search.
5 US customs bombs. impact of domestic economy. http://biz.khan.co.kr/khan_art_view.html?artid=201803091837011&code=920100#csidx5ac3568abc9 c538b585fd03acf8161b, 2019.10.21. Search.
6 China retaliation tariff on the US from 1. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/23/china-to-retaliatewith-new-tariffs-on-...2019.9.11. Search.
7 Lee Je-Hong.Lee Eun-Jae, A Study on the Evaluation of The Public Service Quality in Customs Operation of a Customhouse, The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, Vol. 18. No. 3. August 2017, p.22.
8 Yu, Byung-gyu, Industrial Impacts and Response Strategies of Trump Economic Policy, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, The 2nd Sejong Policy Fellowship, 2017.4.11.p.11-12
9 Joo hyun su, The Impact of US Protecting Strength on the Korean Economy, Korea Institute of Capital Markets, ISSUE ANALYSIS, 2017.02, 2017.1.10.-1.23. p.5-6
10 Jeong Jong-Cheol and Kim Jung-Kwon, Recent Trends in Protection Trade and Korea's Response Measures, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP), 2012.10.19.VoL 12 No19
11 Lee Seo-Young.Yim Byung-Jin, Antidumping Duties and Macroeconomic Variables : The Case of India, The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, Vol. 18. No. 2, May 2017, p.82.
12 Kim Yong-Tae.Lee Eun-Jae, A Study on the Improvement of Customs Duties by Self-Return in Korean Customs Act, The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs, Vol. 18. No. 4, December 2017, p.10.