Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2019.7.4.194

(De)Colonizing Literary Digital Annotating: A Student's Experience in the Classroom  

Koo, Yeonwoo (Department of English Language and Literature, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology / v.7, no.4, 2019 , pp. 194-207 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper is the author's personal experience and interpretation as a student whilst participating in Professor Kyung-Sook Shin's English Literature graduate course, "Literature and Technology II: Feminisms and Digital Humanities," during the 2019 spring semester at Yonsei University, South Korea. Exploring the intersections of literary feminist theory and digital humanities, this paper examines not only the content, but also the methodology and political effects of collaboratively digitally annotating Elizabeth Barrett Browning's epic novel/poem, Aurora Leigh (1856) through the medium, Google Docs. In particular, this paper observes the students' interaction with the digital tools and literature-related pedagogy in two main parts. First, the democratic political nature of classroom culture when creating a new language/code during annotation. Second, the coexistence of cyberspace and the physical classroom space and its effect on time, specifically in the archival of the past, influencing of the future, and the splitting into the present multiverse. From a student's perspective in digital literary annotation, this paper shows that technology could become a way to decolonize and reprogram education to be more inclusive and collaborative.
Keywords
Literary digital annotation; Feminism; Decolonization; Digital humanities; Pedagogy; Aurora Leigh; Elizabeth Barrett Browning; Google Docs;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 K.S. Shin, "Syllabus: Literature and Technology II," Yonsei University, Graduate School of English Literature and Language, Spring 2019.
2 EBB (Elizabeth Barrett Browning) Archive. http://ebbarchive.org/poems/aurora_leigh.php.
3 H.J. Jackson, Marginalia: Readers Writing in Books, Yale University Press, pp. 87, 2001.
4 Scott McCloud, Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art, Harper Perennial, pp. 140, 1993..
5 J.P. Purdy, “Three Gifts of Digital Archives,” Journal of Literacy and Technology, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 26-49, November 2011.
6 J. Hall, "Using a Feminist Digital Humanities Approach: Critical Women's History through Covers of 'Black Coffee,'" Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 1-23, 2018, doi:10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.1.0001.   DOI
7 A. Koh, "Niceness, Building, and Opening the Genealogy of the Digital Humanities: Beyond the Social Contract of Humanities Computing," Differences, Vol. 251, pp. 93-106, 2014, doi: 10.1215/10407391-2420015.   DOI
8 James Madison, Federalist Papers No. 10, 1778. https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/coretexts/_files/resources/texts/c/1787%20Federalist%20No%2010.pdf.
9 Robert Browning, "Porphyria's Lover," in Norton Anthology of English Literature, Eighth Edition, pp. 1278-1279.
10 B. Cooper, "Intersectionality," in The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory, 2016.
11 Ruth Ozeki, A Tale for the Time Being, Penguin Books, pp. 415, 2013.
12 E. Cushman, “Wampum, Sequoyan, and Story: Decolonizing the Digital Archive,” College English, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 115-133, 2013.
13 J. Paradis, K. Fendt, W. Kelley, J. Folsom, J. Pankow, L. Subbaraj & E. Graham, MIT Comparative Media Studies, White paper, "Annotation Studio: Bringing a Time-Honored Learning Practice into the Digital Age," 27 July 2013. https://cmsw.mit.edu/annotation-studio-whitepaper/.