Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2019.7.2.168

Revisiting 'It'-Extraposition in English: An Extended Optimality-Theoretic Analysis  

Khym, Han-gyoo (Daejin University (R.O.K.))
Publication Information
International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology / v.7, no.2, 2019 , pp. 168-178 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper I discuss a more complicated case of 'It'-Extraposition in English in the Optimality Theory [1] by further modifying and extending the analysis done in Khym (2018) [2] in which only the 'relatively' simple cases of 'It'-Extraposition such as 'CP-Predicate' was dealt with. I show in this paper that the constraints and the constraint hierarchy developed to explain the 'relatively' simple cases of 'It'-Extraposition are no longer valid for the more complicated cases of 'It'-Extraposition in configuration of 'CP-V-CP'. In doing so, I also discuss two important theoretic possibilities and suggest a new view to look at the 'It'-Extraposition: first, the long-bothering question of which syntactic approach between P&P (Chomsky 1985) [3] and MP (Chomsky 1992) [4] should be based on in projecting the full surface forms of candidates may boil down to just a simple issue of an intrinsic property of the Gen(erator). Second, the so-called 'It'- Extraposition phenomenon may not actually be a derived construction by the optional application of Extraposition operation. Rather, it could be just a representational construction produced by the simple application of 'It'-insertion after the structure projection with 'that-clause' at the post-verbal position. This observation may lead to elimination of one of the promising candidates of '$It_i{\ldots}[_{CP}that{\sim}]_i$' out of the computation table in Khym [2], and eventually to excluding the long-named 'It'-Extraposition case from Extrsposition phenomena itself. The final constraints and the constraint hierarchy that are explored are as follows: ${\bullet}$ Constraints: $^*SSF$, AHSubj, Subj., Min-D ${\bullet}$ Constraint Hierarchy: SSF<<>>Subj.>> AHSubj.
Keywords
'It'-Extraposition; Optimality Theory (OT); Constraint Hierarchy; Constraints; $^*SSF$; Subj.; AHSubj.; Min-D; CP-Predicate; CP-V-CP; Optimal candidates;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Chomsky, N., "Some Notes on the Economy of Derivation and Representation", in R. Freidin (ed), MITWPL 10, 1992.
2 Lasnik, H., "Two Nots on Control and Binding," in R. Larson et al. eds., Control and Grammar, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990.
3 Milsark, G., Existential Sentences in English, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1974.
4 Milsark, G., "Towards an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities in the Existential Construction in English," Linguistic Analysis 3, pp1-30, 1977.
5 Heim, I., Semantics of Indefinite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1982.
6 Abney, S., The English Noun Phrases in Its Sentential Aspect, Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1987.
7 McCloskey, J., "There, It, an Agreement," Linguistic Inquiry 22, pp.563-567, 1991.
8 Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky, Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar, Blackwell Publishers, (1993/2002/2004). Technical Report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science and Computer Science Department, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1993.
9 Khym, H., "An Optimality-Theoretic Analysis of 'It'- Extraposition in English", IJACT Vol.6, No. 4, pp.58-63, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2018.6.4.
10 Williams, E.S., "Predication," Linguistic Inquiry 11, No. 1, pp.203-208, 1980.
11 Chomsky, N., Barriers, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1985.