Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2018.6.2.1

What do college students think about the autonomy of the abortion?  

Kim, Jung-ae (Chodang University, Nursing Department)
Jung, Hae-ok (Chodang University, Hotel Culinary Department)
Publication Information
International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology / v.6, no.2, 2018 , pp. 1-8 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigates how college students who are fertility women have a right to decide their own heritage. The participants of this study were 20-25 years old who were studying maternal nursing at a university in C province.Participants were 15 in total and conducted in-depth interviews three times until the meaning was no longer present.The data collection period was from November 15, 2017 to December 10.Interview data were processed using the phenomenological Giorgi method. As a result, 128 semantic units were derived, again divided into 9 sub-components, and then divided into 2 categories as final components. In conclusion, Participants agreed overall that abortion should not be increased. Participants agreed overall that abortion should not be increased. There are 5 sub-components in agree of abortion: 'ethical dilemmas', 'assuring women's autonomy', 'being a prepared parent', 'not wanting future misery', and 'women's health rights'. There are 4 sub-components to abortion: The preciousness of life', 'hasty decision', 'murder', 'moral responsibility'. If a sub-component is categorized into a phenomenological context, it can be concluded that there is "importance to life" and "difficulty of decision".
Keywords
Female university student; Fertility women; Phenomenology; Thoughts on abortion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Crowther S, Smythe E. Open, trusting relationships underpin safety in rural maternity a hermeneutic phenomenology study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 24;16(1):370. 2016.   DOI
2 Mumford J. 'To arrive where we started, and know the place for the first time': Heidegger, phenomenology, the way human beings first appear in the world, and fresh perspectives on the abortion debate. New Bioeth. 19(2):72-83. 2013.   DOI
3 Svenaeus F. Phenomenology of pregnancy and the ethics of abortion. Med Health Care Philos. Mar;21(1):77-87, 2018.   DOI
4 Searle J, Goldberg L, Aston M, Burrow S. Accessing new understandings of trauma-informed care with queer birthing women in a rural context. J Clin Nurs. 26(21-22):3576-3587. 2017.   DOI
5 J Ho, Yonsei Law Review 22 (4) 29-53, 2012.
6 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 1973.
7 Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, National Survey on Abortion Abortion, 2011.
8 Adolfsson A, Larsson PG, Wijma B, Bertero C. Guilt and emptiness: women's experiences of miscarriage. Health Care Women Int. Jun-Jul;25(6):543-60, 2004.   DOI
9 Casey, Planned parenthood v. 505 U.S. 833, 870, 1992.
10 DI Shin, Necessity and Direction of Amendment of Article 14 of the Maternal and Child Health Law, Anam Law, pp156, 2010.
11 SK Kim, Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Field report. 2014.
12 Chosun Newspaper 9.13, 2005.
13 Total fertility rate, National Statistical Office, 2008.
14 K. Hindell and Madelaine Simms, Abortion: the Personal Dilemma, Patemoster Press, 1972.
15 The Catholic University of Korea, Catholic Church Teachings, Counseling and Mission to Artificial Heritages, Tests and Babies, Fall, 78-79, 2000.
16 Macleod CI., Expanding reproductive justice through a supportability reparative justice framework: the case of abortion in South Africa. Cult Health Sex. Apr 3:1-17. 2018.
17 Lane V, Kase E.The share of complications of artifical pregnancy interruption in hospital morbidity, Cesk Gynekol. Jul;35(6):374-5. 1970.
18 Bedford CH., Criminal Abortion in the Punjab. Trans Edinb Obstet Soc. 21:203-220. 1896.
19 Polansky M, Singh H, Gao Y, Aaron E. Pregnancy planning, timing, happiness and depressive symptoms among low-income women living with and without HIV. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 21:1-13, 2018.
20 Svenaeus F. Phenomenology of pregnancy and the ethics of abortion. Med Health Care Philos. 21(1):77-87, 2018.   DOI