Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0525

An improvement of real-time polymerase chain reaction system based on probe modification is required for accurate detection of African swine fever virus in clinical samples in Vietnam  

Tran, Ha Thi Thanh (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Dang, Anh Kieu (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Ly, Duc Viet (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Vu, Hao Thi (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Hoang, Tuan Van (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Nguyen, Chinh Thi (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Chu, Nhu Thi (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Nguyen, Vinh The (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Nguyen, Huyen Thi (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Truong, Anh Duc (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Pham, Ngoc Thi (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Dang, Hoang Vu (Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, National Institute of Veterinary Research (NIVR))
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.33, no.10, 2020 , pp. 1683-1690 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The rapid and reliable detection of the African swine fever virus (ASFV) plays an important role in emergency control and preventive measures of ASF. Some methods have been recommended by FAO/OIE to detect ASFV in clinical samples, including realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR). However, mismatches in primer and probe binding regions may cause a false-negative result. Here, a slight modification in probe sequence has been conducted to improve the qualification of real-time PCR based on World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) protocol for accurate detection of ASFV in field samples in Vietnam. Methods: Seven positive confirmed samples (four samples have no mismatch, and three samples contained one mutation in probe binding sites) were used to establish novel real-time PCR with slightly modified probe (Y = C or T) in comparison with original probe recommended by OIE. Results: Both real-time PCRs using the OIE-recommended probe and novel modified probe can detect ASFV in clinical samples without mismatch in probe binding site. A high correlation of cycle quantification (Cq) values was observed in which Cq values obtained from both probes arranged from 22 to 25, suggesting that modified probe sequence does not impede the qualification of real-time PCR to detect ASFV in clinical samples. However, the samples with one mutation in probe binding sites were ASFV negative with OIE recommended probe but positive with our modified probe (Cq value ranked between 33.12-35.78). Conclusion: We demonstrated for the first time that a mismatch in probe binding regions caused a false negative result by OIE recommended real-time PCR, and a slightly modified probe is required to enhance the sensitivity and obtain an ASF accurate diagnosis in field samples in Vietnam.
Keywords
African Swine Fever; Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction; PAMs Cell; Virus Isolation; Molecular Diagnosis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zsak L, Borca MV, Risatti GR, et al. Preclinical diagnosis of African swine fever in contact-exposed swine by a real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:112-9. http://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.1.112-119.2005   DOI
2 Fernandez-Pinero J, Gallardo C, Elizalde M, et al. Epizone ring trial on ASFV real-time PCR. Annual Meeting of National African Swine Fever Laboratories; 2010 May 18: Pulawy, Poland.
3 McKillen J, McMenamy M, Hjertner B, et al. Sensitive detection of African swine fever virus using real-time PCR with a 5' conjugated minor groove binder probe. J Virol Methods 2010;168:141-6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.05.005   DOI
4 Tignon M, Gallardo C, Iscaro C, et al. Development and inter-laboratory validation study of an improved new real-time PCR assay with internal control for detection and laboratory diagnosis of African swine fever virus. J Virol Methods 2011; 178:161-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.09.007   DOI
5 Galindo I, Alonso C. African swine fever virus: a review. Viruses 2017;9:103. https://doi.org/10.3390/v9050103   DOI
6 Cubillos C, Gomez-Sebastian S, Moreno N, et al. African swine fever virus serodiagnosis: a general review with a focus on the analyses of African serum samples. Virus Res 2013;173:159-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.021   DOI
7 Gallardo C, Nieto R, Soler A, et al. Assessment of African swine fever diagnostic techniques as a response to the epidemic outbreaks in Eastern European Union countries: how to improve surveillance and control programs. J Clin Microbiol 2015;53:2555-65. http://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00857-15   DOI
8 Simulundu E, Sinkala Y, Chambaro HM, et al. Genetic characterisation of African swine fever virus from 2017 outbreaks in Zambia: Identification of p72 genotype II variants in domestic pigs. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2018;85:a1562. https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v85i1.1562
9 Kapoor R, Sharma B, Kanwar SS. Antiviral phytochemicals: an overview. Biochem Physiol 2017;6:220. http://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9652.1000220
10 Quembo CJ, Jori F, Vosloo W, Heath L. Genetic characterization of African swine fever virus isolates from soft ticks at the wildlife/domestic interface in Mozambique and identification of a novel genotype. Transbound Emerg Dis 2018;65:420-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12700   DOI
11 OIE. African swine fever. Chapter 2.8.1. Paris, France: Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals; 2012.
12 Oura CAL, Edwards L, Batten CA. Virological diagnosis of African swine fever--comparative study of available tests. Virus Res 2013;173:150-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.022   DOI
13 Fernandez-Pinero J, Gallardo C, Elizalde M, et al. Molecular diagnosis of African Swine Fever by a new real-time PCR using universal probe library. Transbound Emerg Dis 2013;60:48-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2012.01317.x   DOI
14 Suss B, Flekna G, Wagner M, Hein I. Studying the effect of single mismatches in primer and probe binding regions on amplification curves and quantification in real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 2009;76:316-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.12.003   DOI
15 Kamau E, Agoti CN, Lewa CS, et al. Recent sequence variation in probe binding site affected detection of respiratory syncytial virus group B by real-time RT-PCR. J Clin Virol 2017;88:21-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2016.12.011   DOI
16 King DP, Reid SM, Hutchings GH, et al. Development of a TaqMan PCR assay with internal amplification control for the detection of African swine fever virus. J Virol Methods 2003;107:53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0934(02)00189-1   DOI