Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0898

Metabolizable energy requirement for maintenance estimated by regression analysis of body weight gain or metabolizable energy intake in growing pigs  

Liu, Hu (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Chen, Yifan (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Li, Zhongchao (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Li, Yakui (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Lai, Changhua (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Piao, Xiangshu (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
van Milgen, Jaap (INRA)
Wang, Fenglai (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.32, no.9, 2019 , pp. 1397-1406 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: Feed energy required for pigs is first prioritized to meet maintenance costs. Additional energy intake in excess of the energy requirement for maintenance is retained as protein and fat in the body, leading to weight gain. The objective of this study was to estimate the metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance ($ME_m$) by regressing body weight (BW) gain against metabolizable energy intake (MEI) in growing pigs. Methods: Thirty-six growing pigs ($26.3{\pm}1.7kg$) were allotted to 1 of 6 treatments with 6 replicates per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Treatments were 6 feeding levels which were calculated as 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100% of the estimated ad libitum MEI ($2,400kJ/kg\;BW^{0.60}\;d$). All pigs were individually housed in metabolism crates for 30 d and weighed every 5 d. Moreover, each pig from each treatment was placed in the open-circuit respiration chambers to measure heat production (HP) and energy retained as protein ($RE_p$) and fat ($RE_f$) every 5 d. Serum biochemical parameters of pigs were analyzed at the end of the experiment. Results: The average daily gain (ADG) and HP as well as the $RE_p$ and $RE_f$ linearly increased with increasing feed intake (p<0.010). ${\beta}$-hydroxybutyrate concentration of serum tended to increase with increasing feed intake (p = 0.080). The regression equations of MEI on ADG were MEI, $kJ/kg\;BW^{0.60}\;d=1.88{\times}ADG$, g/d+782 ($R^2=0.86$) and $ME_m$ was estimated at $782kJ/kg\;BW^{0.60}\;d$. Protein retention of growing pigs would be positive while REf would be negative at this feeding level via regression equations of $RE_p$ and $RE_f$ on MEI. Conclusion: The $ME_m$ was estimated at $782kJ/kg\;BW^{0.60}\;d$ in current experiment. Furthermore, growing pigs will deposit protein and oxidize fat if provided feed at the estimated maintenance level.
Keywords
Fat; Growing Pigs; Indirect Calorimetry; Maintenance Energy Requirement; Protein;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Liu XT, Ma WF, Zeng XF, et al. Estimation of the standardized ileal digestible valine to lysine ratio required for 25-to 120-kilogram pigs fed low crude protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids. J Anim Sci 2015;93:4761-73. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9308   DOI
2 Tian YY, Gong LM, Xue JX, Cao J, Zhang LY. Effects of graded levels of chromium methionine on performance, carcass traits, meat quality, fatty acid profiles of fat, tissue chromium concentrations, and antioxidant status in growing-finishing pigs. Biol Trace Elem Res 2015;168:110-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0352-1   DOI
3 Wu F, Johnston LJ, Urriola PE, Hilbrands AM, Shurson GC. Effects of feeding diets containing distillers' dried grains with solubles and wheat middlings with equal predicted dietary net energy on growth performance and carcass composition of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2016;94:144-54. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9592
4 Campbell RG, Dunkin AC. The influence of dietary protein and energy intake on the performance, body composition and energy utilization of pigs growing from 7 to 19 kg. Anim Sci 1983;36:185-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800001235   DOI
5 Quiniou N, Dourmad JY, Noblet J. Effect of energy intake on the performance of different types of pig from 45 to 100 kg body weight. 1. Protein and lipid deposition. Anim Sci 1996;63:277-88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800014831   DOI
6 Velayudhan DE, Kim IH, Nyachoti CM. Characterization of dietary energy in Swine feed and feed ingredients: a review of recent research results. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:1-13. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0001R   DOI
7 Chwalibog A, Jakobsen K, Henckel S, Thorbek G. Estimation of quantitative oxidation and fat retention from carbohydrate, protein and fat in growing pigs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 1992;68:123-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.1992.tb00652.x   DOI
8 Van Milgen J, Noblet J. Partitioning of energy intake to heat, protein, and fat in growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2003;81(Suppl 2):E86-E93. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.8114_suppl_2E86x
9 Black JL. Manipulation of body composition through nutrition. In: Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 2009; 2009 Feb; Sydney, Australia. Armidale NSW, Australia: ASAP; 1974. pp. 211-8.
10 Wiesemuller W, Poppe S, Hackl W. Studies of the energy metabolism of pigs at a feeding level at live weight equilibrium. Arch Anim Nutr 1988;38:603-17.
11 Just A. Nutritional manipulation and interpretation of body compositional differences in growing swine. J Anim Sci 1984;58:740-52. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.583740x   DOI
12 Campbell RG, Taverner MR, Curic DM. The influence of feeding level from 20 to 45 kg live weight on the performance and body composition of female and entire male pigs. Anim Sci 1983;36:193-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800001247   DOI
13 Ayoade DI, Kiarie E, Neto MAT, Nyachoti CM. Net energy of diets containing wheat-corn distillers dried grains with solubles as determined by indirect calorimetry, comparative slaughter, and chemical composition methods. J Anim Sci 2012;90:4373-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4858   DOI
14 van Milgen J, Noblet J. Energy partitioning in growing pigs: the use of a multivariate model as an alternative for the factorial analysis. J Anim Sci 1999;77:2154-62. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7782154x   DOI
15 Campbell RG, Taverner MR, Curic DM. Effects of sex and energy intake between 48 and 90 kg live weight on protein deposition in growing pigs. Anim Sci 1985;40:497-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100040198   DOI
16 Laeger T, Metges CC, Kuhla B. Role of beta-hydroxybutyric acid in the central regulation of energy balance. Appetite 2010;54:450-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.005   DOI
17 Kil DY, Kim BG, Stein HH. Feed energy evaluation for growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013;26:1205-17. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.r.02   DOI
18 Sleiman SF, Henry J, Al-Haddad R, et al. Exercise promotes the expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) through the action of the ketone body beta-hydroxybutyrate. Elife 2016;5:e15092. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15092   DOI
19 Whang KY, Easter RA. Blood urea nitrogen as an index of feed efficiency and lean growth potential in growing-finishing swine. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2000;13:811-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.811   DOI
20 Labussiere E, van Milgen J, de Lange CFM, Noblet J. Maintenance energy requirements of growing pigs and calves are influenced by feeding level. J Nutr 2011;141:1855-61. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.111.141291   DOI
21 Bunaciu AA, Aboul-Enein HY, Hoang VD. Raman spectroscopy for protein analysis. Appl Spectrosc Rev 2015;50:377-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2014.990463   DOI
22 Lomb DJ, Laurent G, Haigis MC. Sirtuins regulate key aspects of lipid metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom 2010;1804:1652-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2009.11.021   DOI
23 NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine, eleventh revised editon. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2012.
24 Yuliarty, Low S, Fisher J, Dryden GM. Energy requirements for maintenance and growth of entire male Bali cattle in East Timor. Anim Prod Sci 2014;54:908-14. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN13092   DOI
25 Noblet J, Karege C, Dubois S, van Milgen J. Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype. J Anim Sci 1999;77:1208-16. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7751208x   DOI
26 ARC. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux; 1981.
27 de Lange K, van Milgen J, Noblet J, Dubois S, Birkett S. Previous feeding level influences plateau heat production following a 24 h fast in growing pigs. Br J Nutr 2006;95:1082-7. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20061748   DOI
28 Zemmelink G, Tolkamp BJ, Ogink NWM. Energy requirements for maintenance and gain of West African Dwarf goats. Small Rumin Res 1991;5:205-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(91)90125-A   DOI
29 Early RJ, Mahgoub O, Lu CD. Energy and protein utilization for maintenance and growth in Omani ram lambs in hot climates. I. Estimates of energy requirements and efficiency. J Agric Sci 2001;136:451-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859601008899   DOI
30 Luo J, Goetsch AL, Sahlu T, et al. Prediction of metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance and gain of preweaning, growing and mature goats. Small Rumin Res 2004;53:231-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.04.006   DOI
31 Liu DW, Jaworski NW, Zhang GF, Li Z, Li D, Wang F. Effect of experimental methodology on fasting heat production and the net energy content of corn and soybean meal fed to growing pigs. Arch Anim Nutr 2014;68:281-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2014.931016   DOI
32 Goerke M, Mosenthin R, Jezierny D, et al. Effect of feeding level on ileal and total tract digestibility of nutrients and energy from soybean meal-based diets for piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2014;98:1154-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12174   DOI
33 Morel PCH, Lee TS, Moughan PJ. Effect of feeding level, live weight and genotype on the apparent faecal digestibility of energy and organic matter in the growing pig. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006;126:63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.06.006   DOI
34 van Milgen J, Bernier JF, Lecozler Y, Dubois S, Noblet J. Major determinants of fasting heat production and energetic cost of activity in growing pigs of different body weight and breed/castration combination. Br J Nutr 1998;79:509-17.   DOI
35 Noblet J, Fortune H, Shi XS, Dubois S. Prediction of net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 1994;72:344-54. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.722344x   DOI
36 Inoue H, Watanuki M, Myint HT, Ito T, Kuwayama H, Hidari H. Effects of fasting and refeeding on plasma concentrations of leptin, ghrelin, insulin, growth hormone and metabolites in swine. Anim Sci J 2005;76:367-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2005.00277.x   DOI
37 Moro T, Tinsley G, Bianco A, et al. Effects of eight weeks of time-restricted feeding (16/8) on basal metabolism, maximal strength, body composition, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk factors in resistance-trained males. J Transl Med 2016;14:290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1044-0   DOI
38 Zhang GF, Liu DW, Wang FL, Li DF. Estimation of the net energy requirements for maintenance in growing and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;92:2987-95. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7002   DOI
39 AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International;2007.
40 Thiex NJ, Anderson S, Gildemeister B. Crude fat, diethyl ether extraction, in feed, cereal grain, and forage (Randall/Soxtec/submersion method): collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2003;86:888-98.   DOI
41 Li P, Li DF, Zhang HY, et al. Determination and prediction of energy values in corn distillers dried grains with solubles sources with varying oil content for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2015;93:3458-70. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8782   DOI
42 Adeola O. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Swine nutrition. Washington, DC, USA: CRC Press; 2001. p. 903-16.
43 Chwalibog A, Jakobsen K, Tauson AH, Thorbek G. Energy metabolism and nutrient oxidation in young pigs and rats during feeding, starvation and re-feeding. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2005;140:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2005.01.010   DOI
44 Brouwer E. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In: Proceedings of the 3rd EAAP Symposium on Energy Metabolism 1965. London, UK: Academic Press; 1965. p. 442-3.
45 Chwalibog A, Tauson AH, Thorbek G. Energy metabolism and substrate oxidation in pigs during feeding, starvation and re-feeding. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2004;88:101-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2003.00465.x   DOI
46 Chwalibog A, Thorbek G. Quantitative partition of protein, carbohydrate and fat pools in growing pigs. Arch Anim Nutr 1995;48:53-61.
47 Peers DG, Taylor AG, Whittemore CT. The influence of feeding level and level of dietary inclusion on the digestibility of barley meal in the pig. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1977;2:41-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(77)90039-6   DOI
48 Noblet J, Perez JM. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. J Anim Sci 1993;71:3389-98. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x   DOI
49 Lovatto PA, Sauvant D, Noblet J, Dubois S, van Milgen J. Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2006;84:3329-36. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-048   DOI
50 Noblet J, Henry Y. Energy evaluation systems for pig diets - a review. Livest Prod Sci 1993;36:121-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(93)90147-A   DOI
51 Le Goff G, Noblet J. Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. J Anim Sci 2001;79:2418-27. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7992418x   DOI