Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0825

Carcass characteristics of lambs fed diets with increasing levels of crude glycerin  

Costa, Caio Alves da (Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Roraima, UFRR)
Carvalho, Francisco Fernando Ramos de (Department of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, UFRPE)
Guim, Adriana (Department of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, UFRPE)
Andrade, Gilcifran Prestes de (Department of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, UFRPE)
Cardoso, Daniel Barros (Department of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, UFRPE)
Maciel, Michel do Vale (Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Amazonas, UFAM)
Silva, Gabriela Goncalves da (Department of Veterinary Medicine, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, UFRPE)
Nascimento, Andreza Guedes de Oliveira (Department of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, UFRPE)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.32, no.12, 2019 , pp. 1882-1888 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of increasing levels of crude glycerin (0%, 6%, 12%, and 18%) used as a substitute for corn in lamb feed on the quantitative characteristics of the carcass. Methods: A total of 40 crossbred Santa $In{\hat{e}}s$ lambs that were four months old with a mean initial weight of $21.0{\pm}0.8kg$ were randomly distributed in four treatments with ten replicates. The animals were slaughtered after 66 days of confinement. The effects of crude glycerin as a replacement for corn in the diet of the lambs on the carcass characteristics, commercial cut weight and yield and carcass measurements were studied. Results: There was an increasing linear effect for body weight at slaughter with the replacement of corn by crude glycerin. The dry matter and metabolizable energy intakes, weight of the empty body, hot carcass weight and cold carcass weight showed a quadratic effect, with maximum crude glycerin levels estimated at 10.9%, 9.8%, 10.83%, 11.78%, and 11.35%, respectively. The initial pH was not influenced by the replacement of corn for crude glycerin, while the final pH presented a quadratic effect. The other parameters of the carcass and the weights and yields of commercial cuts were not influenced. There was also no effect of the diets on carcass morphometric measurements, except for the thoracic perimeter and the carcass compactness index, which presented quadratic and linear effects, respectively. Conclusion: Crude glycerin can replace up to 18% of corn because it favours muscle tissue deposition without promoting changes in the main carcass characteristics of lambs.
Keywords
Glycerol; Energy; Performance; Sheep; Meat;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dasari MA, Kiatsimkul PP, Sutterlin WR, Suppes GJ. Lowpressure hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol. Appl Catal A 2005;281:225-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2004.11.033   DOI
2 Chanjula P, Pakdeechanuan P, Wattanasit S. Effects of feeding crude glycerin on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics in finishing goats. Small Rumin Res 2015;123:95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.11.011   DOI
3 Chanjula P, Raungprim T, Yimmongko S, Poonko S, Majarune S, Maitreejet W. Effects of elevated crude glycerin concentrations on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics in finishing steers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29:80-8. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0219   DOI
4 Krehbiel CR. Ruminal and physiological metabolism of glycerin. J Anim Sci 2008;86:392.   DOI
5 Cerrate S, Yan F, Wang C, Coto C, Sacakli P, Waldroup PW. Evaluation of glycerine from biodiesel production as a feed ingredient for broilers. Int Poult Sci 2006;5:1001-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.1001.1007   DOI
6 Pereira ES, Pimentel PG, Fontenele RM, Medeiros AN, Regadas Filho JGL, Villarroel ABS. Characteristics and yields of carcass and cuts in Santa Ines sheep fed with different concentrations of metabolizable energy. Acta Sci 2010;32:431-7.
7 Barros MCC, Marques JAM, Silva FF, et al. Crude glycerin in diets for wethers in feedlot: intake, digestibility, performance, carcass and meat traits. Semin Cienc Agrar 2015;36:453-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n1p453   DOI
8 Rego FCA, Francozo MC, Ludovico A, et al. Development, economic viability and attributes of lamb carcass from confined animals fed on different amounts of crude glycerin. Semin Cienc Agrar 2015;36:3445-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n5p3445   DOI
9 D'Aurea AP, Ezequiel JMB, D'Aurea EMO, et al. Glycerin associated with urea in finishing beef cattle: performance and meat characteristics. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2017;69:165-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8895   DOI
10 National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2007.
11 AOAC. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. Association of Analytical Chemists. Gaithersburg: VA, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
12 Mertens DR. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fibre in feeds with refluxing beakers or crucibles: a collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2002;85:1217-40.
13 BRASIL, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply. Normative Instruction Nunber 3 of January 17th, 2000 [Internet]. Technical regulation on methods of desensitization for humanitarian slaughtering of animals. Official Journal of the Union, Brasilia, January 24th, 2000, section 1. p.
14 Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;57:347-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3   DOI
15 Weiss WP. Energy prediction equations for ruminant feeds. In: Cornell Nutrition Conference Feed Manufactures, 61th Proceedings; Ithaka, NY, USA: Cornell University; 1999. pp. 176-85.
16 Andrade GP, Carvalho FFR, Batista AMV, et al. Evaluation of crude glycerin as a partial substitute of corn grain in growing diets for lambs. Small Rumin Res 2018;165:41-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.06.002   DOI
17 Cezar MF, Souza WH. Sheep and goat carcasses: obtaining, evaluation and classification. Uberaba, MG, Brazil: Tropical Agriculture Publishing; 2007. 147 p.
18 SAS. Statistical analysis system. User's guide, version 9.0. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 2002.
19 Carvalho VB, Leite RF, Almeida MTC, et al. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs fed high concentrations of crude glycerin in low-starch diets. Meat Sci 2015;110:285-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.08.001   DOI
20 Lage JF, Paulino PVR, Pereira LGR, et al. Carcass characteristics of feedlot lambs fed crude glycerin contaminated with high concentrations of crude fat. Meat Sci 2014;96:108-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.06.020   DOI
21 Silva Sobrinho AG, Purchas RW, Kadim IT, Yamamoto SM. Meat quality in lambs of different genotypes and ages at slaughter R Bras Zootec 2005;34:1070-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000300040   DOI
22 Martins RRC, Oliveira NM, Osorio JCS, Osorio MTM. Live weight at slaughter as an indicator of carcass weight and quantitative and qualitative characteristics in Ideal sheep. Bage, Brazil: Embrapa Pecuaria Sul. (Research Bulletin, 21); 2000. 29 p.
23 Gerrard DE, Grant AL. Principles of animal growth and development. Revised Printing. Purdue University, Dubuque, Iowa, USA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 2006. 264 p.
24 Osorio JCS, Osorio MTM, Oliveira NRM, Siewerdt L. Carcass quality, morphology and evaluation. Pelotas, Brazil: University Press and Graphics - UFPel, 2002. 195 p.
25 Silva Sobrinho AG. Sheep breeding. 2 th ed. Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, Brazil: FUNEP (Research Support Foundation); 2001. 302 p.
26 Furusho-Garcia IFF, Perez JRO, Bonagurio S, Lima AL, Quintao FA. Study of the carcass cuts of Santa Ines and crosses with Texel, ile de France and Bergamacia lambs. R Bras Zootec 2004;33:453-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000200024   DOI