Morphological defects of sperm and their association with motility, fertility, and hatchability in four Korean native chicken breeds |
Feyisa, Shiferaw Garoma
(Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
Park, Young Hyun (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) Kim, Young Min (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) Lee, Bo Ram (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) Jung, Kyung Min (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) Choi, Seong Bok (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) Cho, Chang Yeon (Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) Han, Jae Yong (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) |
1 | Sontakke SD, Umapathy G, Sivaram V, Kholkute SD, Shivaji S. Semen characteristics, cryopreservation, and successful artificial insemination in the Blue rock pigeon (Columba livia). Theriogenology 2004;62:139-53. DOI |
2 | Alkan S, Baran A, Ozadas OB, Evecev M. Morphological defects in turkey semen. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2002;26:1087-92. |
3 | Hu J, Chen J, Wen J, et al. Estimation of the genetic parameters of semen quality in Beijing-You chickens. Poult Sci 2013;92:2606-12. DOI |
4 | Brillard J-P. Factors affecting oviductal sperm storage in domestic fowl following artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 1992;27:247-56. DOI |
5 | Love CC, Varner DD, Thompson JA. Intra-and inter-stallion variation in sperm morphology and their relationship with fertility. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1999:93-100. |
6 | Sharlip ID, Jarow JP, Belker AM, et al. Best practice policies for male infertility. Fertil Steril 2002;77:873-82. DOI |
7 | Sapp R, Rekaya R, Misztal I, Wing T. Male and female fertility and hatchability in chickens: A longitudinal mixed model approach. Poult Sci 2004;83:1253-9. DOI |
8 | Malik A, Haron AW, Yusoff R, Nesa M, Bukar M, Kasim A. Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken, and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2013;37:564-8. DOI |
9 | Cheng FP, Guo TJ, Wu JT, et al. Annual variation in semen characteristics of pigeons (Columba livia). Poult Sci 2002;81:1050-6. DOI |
10 | Suh S, Sharma A, Lee S, et al. Genetic diversity and relationships of Korean chicken breeds based on 30 microsatellite markers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:1399-405. DOI |
11 | Saacke R. Semen quality in relation to semen preservation. J Dairy Sci 1983;66:2635-44. DOI |
12 | Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Shanmugam M, et al. Characterization of two Indian native chicken breeds for production, egg and semen quality, and welfare traits. Poult Sci 2011;90:314-20. DOI |
13 | Bjorndahl L, Soderlund I, Kvist U. Evaluation of the one-step eosin-nigrosin staining technique for human sperm vitality assessment. Hum Reprod 2003;18:813-6. DOI |
14 | Love C. Relationship between sperm motility, morphology and the fertility of stallions. Theriogenology 2011;76:547-57. DOI |
15 | Pereira RJ, Napolitano A, Garcia-Pereira FL, et al. Conservation of avian germplasm by xenogeneic transplantation of spermatogonia from sexually mature donors. Stem cells Dev 2012;22:735-49. |
16 | Stromberg J, Stromberg L. Guide to better hatching. Fort Dodge, IA, USA: Stromberg Pub. Co.; 1975. |
17 | Sexton T. Effect of semen treatments and age of tom on fertility of unstored semen and semen held 18 hours. Poult Sci 1987;66:1721-6. DOI |
18 | Shanmugam M, Rajkumar U, Reddy M, Rao SR. Effect of age on semen quality in naked neck and dwarf chicken under tropical climatic conditions. Anim Prod Sci 2012;52:964-8. DOI |
19 | Scherf BD. World watch list for domestic animal diversity. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); 2000. |
20 | Sexton T. Breeding by artificial insemination. Br Poult Sci Ltd 1984:175-81. |
21 | Burrows W, Quinn J. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poult Sci 1937;16:19-24. DOI |
22 | Khan M, Ijaz A. Effects of osmotic pressure on motility, plasma membrane integrity and viability in fresh and frozen-thawed buffalo spermatozoa. Animal 2008;2:548-53. |
23 | Nguyen TMD, Seigneurin F, Froment P, Combarnous Y, Blesbois E. The 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is involved in the augmentation of antioxidant defenses in cryopreserved chicken sperm. PloS one 2015;10:e0134420. DOI |
24 | Holt W. Basic aspects of frozen storage of semen. Anim Reprod SCci 2000;62:3-22. DOI |
25 | Wishart G. Quantitation of the fertilising ability of fresh compared with frozen and thawed fowl spermatozoa. Br Poult Sci 1985;26:375-80. DOI |
26 | Holsberger DR, Donoghue A, Froman D, Ottinger M. Assessment of ejaculate quality and sperm characteristics in turkeys: sperm mobility phenotype is independent of time. Poult Sci 1998;77:1711-7. DOI |
27 | Omeje S, Marire B. Evaluation of the semen characteristics of adult cocks of different genetic backgrounds. Theriogenology 1990;34:1111-8. DOI |
28 | Lukaszewicz E, Jerysz A, Partyka A, Siudzinska A. Efficacy of evaluation of rooster sperm morphology using different staining methods. Res Vet Sci 2008;85;583-8. DOI |
29 | Ntemka A, Tsousis G, Brozos C, et al. Breed differences of bull frozen-thawed semen. Reprod Domest Anim 2016;51:945-52. DOI |
30 | Kuster C, Singer R, Althouse G. Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm. Theriogenology 2004;61:691-703. DOI |
![]() |