Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0457

Effect of dietary protein sources on production performance, egg quality, and plasma parameters of laying hens  

Wang, Xiaocui (Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
Zhang, Haijun (Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
Wang, Hao (Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
Wang, Jing (Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
Wu, Shugeng (Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
Qi, Guanghai (Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.30, no.3, 2017 , pp. 400-409 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary protein sources (soybean meal, SBM; low-gossypol cottonseed meal, LCSM; double-zero rapeseed meal, DRM) on laying performance, egg quality, and plasma parameters of laying hens. Methods: A total of 432 32-wk-old laying hens were randomly divided into 6 treatments with 6 replicates of 12 birds each. The birds were fed diets containing SBM, $LCSM_{100}$, or $DRM_{100}$ individually or in combination with an equal amount of crude protein (CP) ($LCSM_{50}$, $DRM_{50}$, and $LCSM_{50}-DRM_{50}$). The experimental diets, which were isocaloric (metabolizable energy, 11.11 MJ/kg) and isonitrogenous (CP, 16.5%), had similar digestible amino acid profile. The feeding trial lasted 12 weeks. Results: The daily egg mass was decreased in the $LCSM_{100}$ and $LCSM_{50}-DRM_{50}$ groups (p<0.05) in weeks 41 to 44. The $LCSM_{50}$ group did not affect egg production compared to the SBM group in weeks 41 to 44 (p>0.05) and showed increased yolk color at the end of the trial (p<0.05). Compared to the SBM group, the $LCSM_{100}$ and $LCSM_{50}-DRM_{50}$ groups showed decreased albumen weight (p<0.05), CP weight in the albumen (p<0.05) and CP weight in the whole egg (p<0.05) at 44 weeks. Plasma total protein (TP) levels were lower in the $LCSM_{100}$ group than in the SBM group at 44 weeks (p<0.05); however, TP, albumin, and globulin levels were not significantly different between the $LCSM_{50}$ group and the SBM group or between the $DRM_{50}$ group and the SBM group (p>0.05). Conclusion: Together, our results suggest that the $LCSM_{100}$ or $DRM_{100}$ diets may produce the adverse effects on laying performance and egg quality after feeding for 8 more weeks. The 100.0 g/kg LCSM diet or the 148.7 g/kg DRM diet has no adverse effects on laying performance and egg quality.
Keywords
Egg Quality; Double-zero Rapeseed Meal; Laying Hen; Laying Performance; Low-gossypol Cottonseed Meal;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Abbasali G, Peyman G. Different dietary levels of rapeseed meal effects on egg quality characteristics in indigenous breeding hens. J Farm Anim Nutr Physiol 2014;9:1-8.
2 He T, Zhang HJ, Wang J, et al. Application of low-gossypol cottonseed meal in laying hens' diet. Poult Sci 2015;94:2456-63.   DOI
3 Adeyemo GO. Effects of cottonseed cake based diets on haematology and serum biochemistry of egg-type chickens. Int J Poult Sci 2008; 7:23-7.   DOI
4 Khajali F, Slominski BA. Factors that affect the nutritive value of canola meal for poultry. Poult Sci 2012;91:2564-75.   DOI
5 Nagalakshmi D, Rama Rao SV, Panda AK, Sastry VRB. Cottonseed meal in poultry diets: a review. J Poult Sci 2007;44:119-34.   DOI
6 Panigrahi S, Plumb VE, Machin DH. Effects of dietary cottonseed meal, with and without iron treatment, on laying hens. Br Poult Sci 1989;30:641-51.   DOI
7 Gilani A, Kermanshahi H, Golian A, Tahmasbi A. Impact of sodium bentonite addition to the diets containing cottonseed meal on production traits on Hy-line W-36 hens. J Anim Plant Sci 2013;23:411-5.
8 Feed Database in China. Table of feed composition and nutritive value in China. 25th ed. Bejing, China: Institute, 2014.
9 Woyengo TA, Kiarie E, Nyachoti CM. Metabolizable energy and standardized ileal digestible amino acid contents of expeller-extracted canola meal fed to broiler chicks. Poult Sci 2010;89:1182-9.   DOI
10 AOCS. Official Methods and Recommended Practices, American Oil Chemists Society, 6th ed. AOCS, Chicago, IL: .2009.
11 National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9 th rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1994.
12 Lemme A. Amino acid recommendation for laying hens. Amino 2009;13:27-30.
13 Amino Dat 4.0. 50 year amino acid analysis. Hanau, Germany: Evonik Industries AG; 2010.
14 AOAC International. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th Ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC International, 2005.
15 Ahmed AM, Rodriguez-navarro AB, Vidal ML, et al. Changes in eggshell mechanical properties, crystallographic texture and in matrix proteins induced by moult in hens. Br Poult Sci 2005;46:268-79.   DOI
16 Novak C, Yakout HM, Scheideler SE. The effect of dietary protein level and total sulfur amino acid: lysine ratio on egg production parameters and egg yield in Hy-Line W-98 hens. Poult Sci 2006;85: 2195-206.   DOI
17 He LQ, Yang HS, Hou YQ, et al. Effects of dietary L-lysine intake on the intestinal mucosa and expression of CAT genes in weaned piglets. Amino Acids 2013;45:383-91.   DOI
18 Harms RH, Russell GB. Optimizing egg mass with amino acid supplementation of a low protein diet. Poult Sci 1993;72:1892-6.   DOI
19 Gilbert ER, Li H, Emmerson DA, Webb KE Jr, Wong EA. Dietary protein quality and feed restriction influence abundance of nutrient transporter mRNA in the small intestine of broiler chicks. J Nutr 2008;138:262-71.   DOI
20 Baker DH. Advances in protein-amino acid nutrition of poultry. Amino Acids 2009;37:29-41.   DOI
21 Brake J, Balnave D, Dibner JJ. Optimum dietary arginine: lysine ratio for broiler chickens is altered during heat stress in association with changes in intestinal uptake and dietary sodium chloride. Br Poult Sci 1998;39:639-47.   DOI
22 Yin YL, Yao K, Liu ZJ, et al. Supplementing L-leucine to a low-protein diet increases tissue protein synthesis in weanling pigs. Amino Acids 2010;39:1477-86.   DOI
23 Watkins SE, Skinner JT, Adams MH, Waldroup PW. An evaluation of low-gossypol cottonseed meal in diets for broiler chickens1. Effect of cottonseed meal level and lysine supplementation. J Appl Poult Res 1993;2:221-6.   DOI
24 Kovacs-nolan J, Phillips AM, Mine Y. Advances in the value of eggs and egg components for human health. J Agric Food Chem 2005;53: 8421-31.   DOI
25 Cowieson AJ, Acamovic T, Bedford MR. The effects of phytase and phytic acid on the loss of endogenous amino acids and minerals form broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 2004;45:101-8.   DOI
26 Nelson FS. Quality of eggs produced by laying chickens fed lowgossypol cottonseed meal. Ghana Jnl Agric Sci 2004;37:43-7.
27 Davis AJ, Lordelo MM, Dale N. The use of cottonseed meal with or without added soapstock in laying hen diets. J Appl Poult Res 2002;11:127-33.   DOI
28 Yuan C, Song HH, Zhang XY, et al. Effect of expanded cottonseed meal on laying performance, egg quality, concentrations of free gossypol in tissue, serum and egg of laying hens. Anim Sci J 2014;85: 549-54.   DOI
29 Omana DA, Wang JP, Wu JP. Ovomucin-a glycoprotein with promising potential. Trends Food Sci Technol 2010;21:455-63.   DOI
30 Phelps RA. Cottonseed meal for poultry: from research to practical application. World Poult Sci J 1966;22:86-112.   DOI