Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0907

Effects of Mixing on the Aggressive Behavior of Commercially Housed Pigs  

Rhim, Shin-Jae (School of Bioresource and Bioscience, Chung-Ang University)
Son, Seung-Hun (School of Bioresource and Bioscience, Chung-Ang University)
Hwang, Hyun-Su (School of Bioresource and Bioscience, Chung-Ang University)
Lee, Jae-Kang (School of Bioresource and Bioscience, Chung-Ang University)
Hong, Joon-Ki (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.28, no.7, 2015 , pp. 1038-1043 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the effects of mixing on the aggressive behavior of commercially housed pigs. The behavioral patterns of 36 groups of pigs (a total of 360 animals) were observed over 3 consecutive days directly after weaning ($25{\pm}1.2$ days of age), and 25 and 50 days later with the aid of video technology. Fight latency and total duration and frequency of fighting were significantly different among the age groups. The aggressive behaviors decreased in 75-day old pigs if compared to 25- and 50-day old animals. Moreover, dominance index (DI) was higher in 25-day old and lower in 75-day old pigs. A comparison of dominant (DI>0) and submissive (DI<0) pigs showed significant differences (p<0.05) for major aggressive behaviors in all age groups. Dominant pigs were involved in more aggressive interactions, had longer fights, and initiated more fights than submissive pigs. Post-mixing aggressive behavior was altered by previous experience of mixing. Aggressive behavior and DI are suitable methods for analyzing the effects of mixing on commercially housed growing pigs.
Keywords
Aggressive Behavior; Dominance Index; Interaction; Mixing; Pig;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Krauss, V. and S. Hoy. 2011. Dry sows in dynamic groups: An investigation of social behaviour when introducing new sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 130:20-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Langbein, J. and B. Puppe. 2004. Analyzing dominance relationships by sociometric methods: a plea for a more standardized and precise approach in farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 87:293-315.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Li, Y. and L. Wang. 2011. Effects of previous housing system on agonistic behaviors of growing pigs at mixing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 132:20-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 McGlone, J. J. 1986. Influence of resources on pig aggression and dominance. Behav. Processes 12:135-144.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Meese, G. B. and R. Ewbank. 1972. A note on instability of the dominance hierarchy and variations in level of aggression within groups of fattening pigs. Anim. Prod. 14:359-362.   DOI
6 Meese, G. B. and R. Ewbank. 1973. The establishment and nature of the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig. Anim. Behav. 21:326-334.   DOI
7 Mendl, M., A. J. Zanella, and D. M. Broom. 1992. Physiological and reproductive correlates of behavioural strategies in female domestic pigs. Anim. Behav. 44:1107-1121.   DOI
8 National Research Council. 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA.
9 O'Connell, N. E. and V. E. Beattie. 1999. Influence of environmental enrichment on aggressive behavior and dominance relationships in growing pigs. Anim. Welf. 8:269-279.
10 Algers, B., P. Jensen, and L. Steinwall. 1990. Behaviour and weight changes at weaning and regrouping of pigs in relation to teat quality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26:143-155.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Arey, D. S. 1999. Time course for the formation and disruption of social organization in group-housed sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 62:199-207.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Arey, D. S. and S. A. Edwards. 1998. Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56:61-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Ayo, J. O., S. B. Oladele, and A. Fayomi. 1998. Stress and its adverse effects on modern swine production. Pig News Inf. 19:51-56.
14 Borberg, C. and S. Hoy. 2009. Mixing of sows with or without the presence of a boar. Livest. Sci. 125:314-317.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Colson, V., P. Orgeur, V. Courboulay, S. Dantec, A. Foury, and P. Mormede. 2006. Grouping piglets by sex at weaning reduces aggressive behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 97:152-171.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Rhim, S. J. 2012. Effects of group size on agonistic behaviors of commercially housed growing pigs. Rev. Colom. Cienc. Pecua. 25:353-359.
17 O'Connell, N. E., V. E. Beattie, and D. Watt. 2005. Influence of regrouping strategy on performance, behaviour and carcass parameters in pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 97:107-115.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Parratt, C. A., K. J. Chapman, C. Turner, P. H. Jones, M. T. Mendl, and B. G. Miller. 2006. The fighting behaviour of piglets mixed before and after weaning in the presence or absence of a sow. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 101:54-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Pitts, A. D., D. M. Weary, E. A. Pajor, and D. Fraser. 2000. Mixing at young ages reduces fighting in unacquainted domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68:191-197.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Rhim, S. J. 2014. Effects of floor space on the behavior of laying hens in commercial cages. Rev. Colom. Cienc. Pecua. 27:95-101.
21 Samarakone, T. S. and H. Y. Gonyou. 2009. Domestic pigs alter their social strategy in response to social group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12:8-15.
22 Schouten, W. G. P. 1991. Effects of rearing on subsequent performance in pigs. Pig News Inf. 12:245-247.
23 Statham, P., L. Green, M. Bichard, and M. Mendl. 2011. A longitudinal study of the effects of providing straw at different stages of life on tail-biting and other behaviour in commercially housed pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 134:100-108.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Stookey, J. M. and H. W. Gonyou. 1994. The effects of regrouping on behavioral and production parameters in finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2804-2811.   DOI
25 Ewbank, R. 1972. Social environment of the pig. In: Pig Production (Ed. J. A. Cole). University of Nottingham Press, Nottingham, UK. pp. 129-139.
26 D'Earth, R. B. 2005. Socialising piglets before weaning improves social hierarchy formation when pigs are mixed post-weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 93:199-211.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Erhard, H. W., M. Mendl, and D. D. Ashley. 1997. Individual aggressiveness of pigs can be measured and used to reduce aggression after mixing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:137-151.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Estevez, I., I. L. Andersen, and E. Nae vdal. 2007. Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103:185-204.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Ewbank, R. and M. J. Bryant. 1972. Aggressive behaviour amongst groups of domesticated pigs kept at various stocking rates. Anim. Behav. 20:21-28.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Ewbank, R., G. B. Meese, and J. E. Cox. 1974. Individual recognition and the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig. the role of sight. Anim. Behav. 22:473-474.   DOI
31 Hillmann, E., F. von Hollen, B. Bunger, D. Todt, and L. Schrader. 2003. Farrowing conditions affect the reactions of piglets towards novel environment and social confrontation at weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 81:99-109.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Hoy, S. and J. Bauer. 2005. Dominance relationships between sows dependent on the time interval between separation and reunion. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 90:21-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Krause, J. and G. D. Ruxton. 2002. Living in Groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
34 van Erp-van der Kooji, E., A. H. Kuijpers, J. W. Schrama, F. J. C. M. van Eerdenburg, W. G. P. Schouten, and M. J. M. Tielen. 2002. Can we predict behaviour in pigs?: Searching for consistency in behaviour over time and across situations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75:293-305.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Stukenborg, A., I. Traulsen, B. Puppe, U. Presuhn, and J. Krieter. 2011. Agonistic behaviour after mixing in pigs under commercial farm conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 129:28-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Turner, S. P., M. J. Farnworth, I. M. S. White, S. Brotherstone, M. Mendl, P. Knap, P. Penny, and A. B. Lawrence. 2006. The accumulation of skin lesions and their use as a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 96:245-259.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 van de Weerd, H. A., C. M. Docking, J. E. L. Day, and S. A. Edwards. 2005. The development of harmful social behaviour in pigs with intact tails and different enrichment backgrounds in two housing systems. Anim. Sci. 80:289-298.
38 Wechsler, B. and N. Brodmann. 1996. The synchronization of nursing bouts in group-housed sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 47:191-199.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddler River, NJ, USA.
40 Zayan, R. and R. Dantzer. 1990. Social Stress in Farm Animal. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands.