Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13338

Effect of Dietary Concentrate:forage Ratios and Undegraded Dietary Protein on Nitrogen Balance and Urinary Excretion of Purine Derivatives in Dorper×thin-tailed Han Crossbred Lambs  

Ma, Tao (Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture)
Deng, Kai-Dong (College of Animal Science, Jinling Institute of Technology)
Tu, Yan (Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture)
Jiang, Cheng-Gang (Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture)
Zhang, Nai-Feng (Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture)
Li, Yan-Ling (Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture)
Si, Bing-Wen (Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture)
Lou, Can (Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture)
Diao, Qi-Yu (Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.27, no.2, 2014 , pp. 161-168 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate dietary concentrate:forage ratios (C:F) and undegraded dietary protein (UDP) on nitrogen balance and urinary excretion of purine derivatives (PD) in lambs. Four Dorper${\times}$thin-tailed Han crossbred castrated lambs with $62.3{\pm}1.9$ kg body weight at 10 months of age were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments in a $2{\times}2$ factorial arrangement of two levels of C:F (40:60 and 60:40) and two levels of UDP (35% and 50% of CP), according to a complete $4{\times}4$ Latin-square design. Each experimental period lasted for 19 d. After a 7-d adaptation period, lambs were moved into individual metabolism crates for 12 d including 7 d of adaption and 5 d of metabolism trial. During the metabolism trial, total urine was collected for 24 h and spot urine samples were also collected at different times. Urinary PD was measured using a colorimetric method and creatinine was measured using an automated analyzer. Intake of dry matter (DM) (p<0.01) and organic matter (OM) (p<0.01) increased as the level of UDP decreased. Fecal N was not affected by dietary treatment (p>0.05) while urinary N increased as the level of UDP decreased (p<0.05), but decreased as dietary C:F increased (p<0.05). Nitrogen retention increased as dietary C:F increased (p<0.05). As dietary C:F increased, urinary excretion of PD increased (p<0.05), but was not affected by dietary UDP (p>0.05) or interaction between dietary treatments (p>0.05). Daily excretion of creatinine was not affected by dietary treatments (p<0.05), with an average value of $0.334{\times}0.005$ mmol/kg $BW^{0.75}$. A linear correlation was found between total PD excretion and PDC index ($R^2$ = 0.93). Concentrations of creatinine and PDC index in spot urine were unaffected by sampling time (p>0.05) and a good correlation was found between the PDC index (average value of three times) of spot urine and daily excretion of PD ($R^2$ = 0.88). These results suggest that for animals fed ad libitum, the PDC index in spot urine is effective to predict daily excretion of PD. In order to improve the accuracy of the spot sampling technique, an appropriate lag phase between the time of feeding and sampling should be determined so that the sampling time can coincide with the peak concentration of PD in the urine.
Keywords
Lamb; Concentrate:Forage; Undegraded Dietary Protein; Nitrogen Balance; Purine Derivatives;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Agriculture and Food Research Council. 1992. Technical committee on responses to nutrients. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animal: protein. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Ser. B 62:787-835.
2 Agriculture and Food Research Council. 1998. The nutrition of goats. CAB International, New York, NY, 7-64.
3 AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia.
4 Arroquy, J. I., R. C. Cochran, M. Villarreal, T. A. Wickersham, D. A. Llewellyn, E. C. Titgemeyer, T. G. Nagaraja, D. E. Johnson, and D. Gnad. 2004. Effect of level of rumen degradable protein and type of supplemental non-fiber carbohydrate on intake and digestion of low-quality grass hay by beef cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 115:83-99.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Balcells, J., J. A. Guada, C. Castrillo, and J. Gasa. 1991. Urinary excretion of allantoin and allantoin precursors by sheep after different rates of purine infusion into the duodenum. J. Agric. Sci. 116:309-317.   DOI
6 Belenguer, A., D. Yanez, J. Balcells, N. H. Ozdemir-Baber, and M. González-Ronquillo. 2002. Urinary excretion of purine derivatives and prediction of rumen microbial out flow in goats. Livest. Prod. Sci. 77:127-135.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Brody, S. 1964. Bioenergetics and growth. Hafner Publishing Company. pp. 1023.
8 Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G., D. R. Yáñez-Ruiz, A. I. Martín-García, and E. Molina-Alcaide. 2009. Effects of forage:concentrate ratio and forage type on apparent digestibility, ruminal fermentation, and microbial growth in goats. J. Anim. Sci. 87: 622-631.
9 Carro, M. D. and E. L. Miller. 2002. Comparison of microbial markers (15N and purine bases) and bacterial isolates for the estimation of rumen microbial protein synthesis. Anim. Sci. 75:315-321.
10 Chen, X. B. and M. J. Gomes. 1995. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives - an overview of the technical details. International Feed Resources Unit, Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, UK.
11 Chen, X. B., A. T. Mejia, D. J. Kyle, and E. R. Orskov. 1995. Evaluation of the use of the purine derivative:creatinine ratio in spot urine and plasma samples as an index of microbial protein supply in ruminants: studies in sheep. J. Agric. Sci. 125:137-143.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Chen, X. B., G. Grubic, E. R. Orskov, and P. Osuji. 1992. Effect of feeding frequency on diurnal variation in plasma and urinary purine derivatives in steers. Anim. Prod. 55:185-191.   DOI
13 Chen, X. B., M. C. N. Jayasuriya, and H. P. S. Makkar. 2004. Measurement and application of purine derivatives:creatinine ratio in spot urine samples of ruminants. In: Estimation of microbial protein supply in ruminants using urinary purine derivatives (Ed. H. P. S. Makkar, and X. B. Chen). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 168.
14 Cheng, P. 1984. Livestock breeds of China. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
15 Clark, J. H., T. H. Klusmeyer, and M. R. Cameron. 1992. Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions of the duodenum of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 75:2304-2323.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Cloete, S. W., M. A. Snyman, and M. J, Herselman. 2000. Productive performance of Dorper sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 36:119-135.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Fujihara, T., N. S. Martin, and K. Nakamura. 2005. Effect of dietary energy levels on the urinary excretion of purine derivatives in sheep. Anim. Sci. J. 76:441-445.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Domesticated Ruminants. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.
19 Duarte, M. S., P. V. R. Paulino, S. C. Valadares Filho, M. F. Paulino, E. Detmann, J. T. Zervoudakis, J. P. I. S. V. Monnerat, G. S. Viana, L. H. P. Silva, and N. V. L. Serao. 2011. Performance and meat quality traits of beef heifers fed with two levels of concentrate and ruminally undegradable protein. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43: 877-886.   DOI
20 Egan, A. R. and R. J. Moir. 1965. Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep: 1. Effects of duodenally infused single doses of casein, urea, and propionate upon voluntary intake of a low-protein roughage by sheep. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 16:437-449.   DOI
21 George, S. K., M. T. Dipu, U. R. Mehra, A. K. Verma, and P. Singh. 2006. Influence of level of feed intake on concentration of purine derivatives in urinary spot samples and microbial nitrogen supply in crossbred bulls. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1291-1297.   DOI
22 Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural Research Service. Agricultural Handbook No. 379. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
23 Guerouali, A. Y. E. Gass, J. Balcells, A. Belenguer, and J. Nolan. 2004. Urinary excretion of purine derivatives as an index of microbial protein synthesis in the camel (Camelus dromedaries). Br. J. Nutr. 92:225-232.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Hall, M. B. 2000. Calculation of non-structural carbohydrate content of feeds that contain non-protein nitrogen. University of Florida, Gainesville. Bulletin 339: A-25.
25 Lindberg, J. E. 1989. Nitrogen metabolism and urinary excretion of purines in goat kids. Br. J. Nutr. 61:309-321.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Hoover, W. H. and S. R. Stokes. 1991. Balancing carbohydrates and proteins for optimum rumen microbial yield. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3630-3644.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Kebreab, E., J. France, J. A. N. Mills, R. Allison, and J. Dijkstra. 2002. A dynamic model of N metabolism in the lactating dairy cow and an assessment of impact of N excretion on the environment. J. Anim. Sci. 80:248-259.
28 Kiran, D. and T. Mutsvangwa. 2007. Effects of barley grain processing and dietary ruminally degradable protein on urea nitrogen recycling and nitrogen metabolism in growing lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 85:3391-3399.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Ma, T., K-D. Deng, C-G. Jiang, Y. Tu, N-F. Zhang, J. Liu, Y-G. Zhao, and Q-Y. Diao. 2013. The relationship between microbial N synthesis and urinary excretion of purine derivatives in Dorper${\times}$thin-tailed Han crossbred sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 112:49-55.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Moorby, J. M., R. J. Dewhurst, R. T. Evans, and J. L. Danelon. 2006. Effects of dairy cow diet forage proportion on duodenal nutrient supply and urinary purine derivative excretion. J. Dairy Sci. 89:3552-3562.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Nsahlai, I. V., P. O. Osuji, and N. N. Umunna. 2000. Effect of form and of quality of feed on the concentrations of purine derivatives in urinary spot samples, daily microbial N supply and predictability of intake. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 85:223-238.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 National Research Council. 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
33 Reynal, S. M., G. A. Broderick, and C. Bearzl. 2005. Comparison of four markers for quantifying microbial protein flow from the rumen of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:4065-4082.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Pérez, J. F., J. Balcells, J. A. Guada, and C. Castrillo. 1996. Determination of rumen microbial nitrogen production in sheep. A comparison of urinary purine excretion with methods using 15N and purine bases as markers of microbial nitrogen entering the duodenum. Br. J. Nutr. 75: 699-709.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Pina, D. S., S. C. Valadares Filho, L. O. Tedeschi, A. M. Barbosa, and R. F. D. Valadares. 2009. Influence of different levels of concentrate and ruminally undegarded protein on digestive variables in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 87:1058-1067.
36 Ramos, S., M. L. Teijido, M. E. Martínez, M. J. Ranilla, and M. D. Carro. 2009. Microbial protein synthesis, ruminal digestion, microbial populations, and nitrogen balance in sheep fed diets varying in forage-to-concentrate ratio and type of forage. J. Anim. Sci. 87:2924-2934.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Russell, J. B., J. D. O'Connor, D. G. Fox, P. J. Van Soest, and C. J. Sniffen. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. I. Ruminal fermentation. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3551-3561.
38 SAS Institute Inc. 2005. SAS $OnlineDoc^{(R)}$ 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
39 Sauvant, D., R. Baumont, and P. Faverdin. 1996. Development of a mechanistic model of intake and chewing activities of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2785-2802.
40 Stern, M. D., G. A. Varga, J. H. Clark, J. L. Firkins, J. T. Huber, and D. L. Palmquist. 1994. Evaluation of chemical and physical properties of feeds that affect protein metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2762-2786.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Volden, H. and O. M. Harstad. 1995. Effect of rumen incubation on the true indigestibility of feed protein in the digestive tract determined by the nylon bag techniques. Acta Agric. Scand. Sec A. 45:106-115.
42 Tamminga, S. 1996. A review on environmental impacts of nutritional strategies in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 74:3112-3124.
43 Tas, B. M. and Susenbeth. A. 2007. Urinary purine derivatives excretion as an indicator of in vivo microbial N flow in cattle. a review. Livest. Sci. 111:181-192.   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.   DOI   ScienceOn