Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13165

Grazing Behavior and Locomotion of Young Bulls Receiving Different Nutritional Plans in a Tropical Pasture  

Valente, E.E.L. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana)
Paulino, M.F. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV))
Detmann, E. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV))
Filho, S.C. Valadares (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV))
Chizzotti, M.L. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV))
Silva, A.G. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV))
Maciel, I.F.S. (Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Vicosa (UFV))
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.26, no.12, 2013 , pp. 1717-1725 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to compare visual observation and an electronic grazing time method and to evaluate the effects of nutritional plans on intake, grazing behavior and horizontal and vertical locomotion of young bulls in a tropical pasture. Thirty-nine Nellore young bulls with an average body weight of $345{\pm}9.3$ kg kept in pasture were used. The experimental treatments consisted of: restricted: animals kept in a plot with a low mass of forage receiving mineral mixture only; control: animals receiving mineral mixture only; HPHC: a high protein and high carbohydrate supplement; HPLC: a high protein and low carbohydrate supplement; LPHC: a low protein and high carbohydrate supplement; LPLC: a low protein and low carbohydrate supplement. GPS collars equipped with activity sensors were used. Information about head position, latitude, longitude and altitude were recorded. Daytime grazing behavioral patterns monitored by a continuous focal animal recording method was compared to behavior estimated by the activity sensor. Feed intake was estimated by a marker method. The Restricted group presented lower (p<0.05) intake of dry matter and TDN. However, difference in dry matter intake was not found (p>0.05) between non-supplemented and supplemented animals. Difference was not found (p>0.05) in daytime grazing time obtained by visual observation or the activity sensor method. The restricted group showed longer (p<0.05) grazing time (9.58 h/d) than other groups, but difference was not found (p>0.05) in the grazing time between Control (8.35 h/d) and supplemented animals (8.03 h/d). The Restricted group presented lower (p<0.05) horizontal locomotion distance (2,168 m/d) in comparison to other groups (2,580.6 m/d). It can be concluded that the use of activity sensor methods can be recommended due to their being similar to visual observation and able to record 24-h/d. While supplements with high carbohydrates reduce pasture intake, they do not change grazing behavior. Moderate supplementation (until 50% of protein requirement and 30% of energy requirement) of beef cattle on tropical pasture has no effect on daily locomotion.
Keywords
Activity; Cattle; GPS; Sensor; Supplement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Johnson, D. D. and D. C. Ganskopp. 2008. GPS collar sampling frequency: effects on measures of resource use. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 61:226-231.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Krysl, L. J. and B. W. Hess. 1993. Influence of supplementation on behavior of grazing cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2546-2555.
3 Mertens, D. R. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 85: 1217-1240.
4 Ramseyer, A., A. Boissy, B. Thierry, and B. Dumont. 2009. Individual and social determinants of spontaneous group movements in cattle and sheep. Animal 3:1319-1326.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Shingu, Y., M. Mori., H Nakatsuji, S. Kondo, and K. Umemura. 2012. Effects of moving inclination on heart rate of lactating cows during grazing on an inclined pasture. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 83:47-56.   DOI
6 Scaglia, G., H. T. Boland, and W. E. Wyatt. 2009. Effects of time of supplementation on beef stocker calves grazing ryegrass. II. Grazing behavior and dry matter intake. Prof. Anim. Sci. 25:749-756.
7 Souza, M. A., E. Detmann, M. F. Paulino, C. B. Sampaio, I. Lazzarini, and S. C. Valadares Filho 2010. Intake, digestibility and rumen dynamics of neutral detergent fiber in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogen and/or starch. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 42:1299-1310.   DOI
8 Titto, C. G., E. A. L.Titto, R. M. Titto, and G. B. Mourão. 2011. Heat tolerance and the effects of shade on the behavior of Simmental bulls on pastures. Anim. Sci. J. 82:591-600.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Trotter, M. G., D. W. Lamb, G. N. Hinch, and C. N. Guppy. 2010. Global navigation satellite system livestock tracking: system development and data interpretation. Anim. Prod. Sci. 50:616-623.
10 Tucker, C. B., A. R. Rogers, and K. E. Schütz. 2008. Effect of solar radiation on dairy cattle behaviour, use of shade and body temperature in a pasture-based system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 109:141-154.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Ungar, E. D., Z. Henkin, M. Gutman, A. Dolev, A. Genizi, and D. Ganskopp. 2005. Inference of animal activity from GPS collar data on free-ranging cattle. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 58:256-266.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Ungar, E. U., I. Schoenbaum, Z. Henkin, A. Dolev, Y. Yehuda, and A. Brosh. 2010. Inference of the activity timeline of cattle foraging on a mediterranean woodland using GPS and pedometry. Sensors 11:362-383.   DOI
13 Valadares Filho, S. C., P. V. R. Paulino, and K. A. Magalhaes 2006. Exigencias nutricionais de zebuínos e tabelas de composicao de alimentos BR-CORTE. Editora UFV, Vicosa, MG, Brazil..
14 Valente, E. E. L., M. F. Paulino, E. Detmann, S. C. Valadares Filho, L. V. Barros, T. S. Acedo, V. R. M. Couto, and S. A. Lopes 2011a. Levels of multiple supplements or nitrogen salt for beef heifers in pasture during the dry season. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 40: 2011-2019.
15 Valente, T. N. P., E. Detmann, A. C. Queiroz, S. C. Valadares Filho, D. I. Gomes, and J. F. Figueiras. 2011b. Evaluation of ruminal degradability profiles of forage using bags made from different textiles. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 40:2565-2573.   DOI
16 Valente, E. E. L., M. F. Paulino, E. Detmann, S. C. Valadares Filho, and S. A. Lopes. 2013. Performance of young bulls supplemented with different relation of protein and carbohydrate from suckling phase until slaughter in tropical pasture. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 18: 2711-2722.
17 Williams, C. H., D. J. David, and O. Iismaa. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in feces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381-385.   DOI
18 Bargo, F., L. D. Mulher, E. S. Kolver, and J. E. Delahoy. 2003. Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition, AOAC Arlington, VA, USA.
20 Baldivieso, H .L. P., S. M. Cooper, A. F. Cibils, M. F. Pagan, K. Udaeta, and C. M. B. Rubio. 2012. Detecting autocorrelation problems from GPS collar data in livestock studies. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 136:117-125.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Baudracco, J., N. L. Villalobos, C. W. Holmes, and K. A. Macdonald. 2010. Effects of stocking rate, supplementation, genotype and their interactions on grazing dairy systems: a review. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 53:109-133.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Brosh, A., Z. Henkin, E. D. Ungar, A. Dolev, A. Orlov, Y. Yehuda, and Y. Aharoni. 2006. Energy cost of cows' grazing activity: The use of heart rate GPS methods for direct field estimation. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1951-1967.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Brosh, A., Z. Henkin, E. D. Ungar, A. Dolev, A. Shabtay, A. Orlov, Y. Yehuda, and Y. Aharoni 2010. Energy cost of activities and locomotion of grazing cows: a repeated study in larger plots. J. Anim. Sci. 88:315-323.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Carloto, M. N., V. P. B. Euclides, D. B. Montagner, B. Lempp, G. S. Difante, and C. C. L. Paula. 2011. Desempenho animal e caracteristicas de pasto de capim-xaraes sob diferentes intensidades de pastejo, durante o periodo das aguas. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. 46:97-104.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Casagrande, D. R., M. V. Azenha, A. L. S. Valente, B. R. Vieira, M. H. Moretti, A. C. Ruggieri, T. T. Berchielli, and R. A. Reis. 2011. Canopy characteristics and behavior of Nellore heifers in Brachiaria brizantha pastures under different grazing heights at a continuous stocking rate. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 40:2294-2301.   DOI
26 Celaya, R., R. Benavides, U. Garcia, L. M. M. Ferreira, I. Ferre, A. Martinez, L. M. Ortega-Mora, and K. Osoro. 2008. Grazing behaviour and performance of lactating suckler cows, ewes and goats on partially improved heathlands. Animal 2:1818-1831.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Distel, R. A., E. A. Laca, T. C. Griggs, and M. W. Demment. 1995. Patch selection by cattle: maximization of intake rate in horizontally heterogeneous pastures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 45:11-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Glienke, C. L., M. G. Rocha, D. Roso, L. Potter, V. G. Costa, and J. M. Machado. 2010. Ingestive behavior and displacement patterns of beef heifers on Italian ryegrass pasture. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 39:247-254.
29 Figueiras, J. F., E. Detmann, M .F. Paulino, T. N. P. Valente, S. C. Valadares Filho, and I. Lazzarini 2010. Intake and digestibility in cattle under grazing supplemented with nitrogenous compounds during dry season. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 39:1303-1312.   DOI
30 Ganskopp, D. C. and D. W. Bohnert. 2009. Landscape nutritional patterns and cattle distribution in rangeland pastures. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 116:110-119.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Gontijo Neto, M. M., V. P. B. Euclides, D. Nascimento Junior, L. F. Miranda, D. M. Fonseca, and M. P. Oliveira. 2006. Consumo e tempo diario de pastejo por novilhos Nelore em pastagem de capim-tanzania sob diferentes ofertas de forragem. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 35: 60-66.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Gregorini, P., M. Eirin, R. Refi, M. Ursino, O. E. Ansin, and S. A. Gunter. 2006. Timing of herbage allocation in strip grazing: Effects on grazing pattern and performance of beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1943-1950.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Handcock, R. N., D. L. Swain, G. J. B. Hurley, K. P. Patison, T. Wark, P. Valencia, P. Corke, and C. J. O'Neill. 2009. Monitoring animal behavior and environmental interactions using wireless sensor networks, gps collars and satellite remote sensing. Sensors 9:3586-3603.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Hansen, P. J. 2004. Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 82:349-360.
35 Hodgson, J. 1990. Grazing management: science into practice. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, UK.
36 Hunt, L. P., S. Petty, R. Cowley, A. Fisher, A. J. Ash, and N. MacDonald. 2007. Factors affecting the management of cattle grazing distribution in northern Australia: Preliminary observations on the effect of paddock size and water points. Rangeland J. 29: 169-179.   DOI