Comparison of Growth Performance of Antibiotic-free Yorkshire Crossbreds Sired by Berkshire, Large Black, and Tamworth Breeds Raised in Hoop Structures |
Whitley, N.
(North Carolina A&T State University)
Morrow, W.E.M. (North Carolina State University) See, M.T. (North Carolina State University) Oh, S.H. (North Carolina A&T State University) |
1 | Lohmann, U., R. Sausen, L. Bengtsson, U. Cubasch, J. Perlwitz, and E. Roeckner. 1993. The Koppen climate classification as a diagnostic tool for general circulation models. Clim. Res. 3:177-193. DOI |
2 | McPhee, H. C. 1931. Swine Inbreeding at the United States Department of Agriculture - A Progress Report. J. Anim. Sci. 1:131-134. |
3 | Quijandria, B. Jr. and O. W. Robison. 1971. Body weight and backfat deposition in swine: Curves and Correction Factors. J. Anim. Sci. 33:911-918. |
4 | Suzuki, K., T. Shibata, H. Kadowaki, H. Abe and T. Toyoshima. 2003. Meat quality comparison of Berkshire, Duroc and crossbred pigs sired by Berkshire and Duroc. Meat Sci. 64:35-42. DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Talbott, C., T. See, M. Ahmedna, H. Fennell, G. Gunthorp and P. Willis. 2003. Potential for small-scale farmers to produce niche market pork using alternative diets, breeds and rearing environments: Observations from North Carolina. Ren. Ag. Food Sys. 19:135-140. |
6 | Taylor, J. M. and L. N. Hazel. 1955. The Growth curve of pigs between 134 and 174 days of age. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1133-1139. |
7 | Gegner, L. 2001. Considerations in organic hog production. ATTRA's Organic Matters Series. |
8 | Coffey, M. T., B. G. Diggs, D. L. Handlin, D. A. Knabe, C. V. Maxwell, Jr., P. R. Noland, T. J. Prince and G. L. Gromwell. 1994. Effects of dietary energy during gestation and lactation on reproductive performance of sows: A cooperative study. J. Anim. Sci. 72:4-9. |
9 | Cook, R. D. and S. Weisberg. 1982. Residuals and Influence in Regression. London: Chapman and Hall. |
10 | Fahmy, M. H. and W. B. Holtman. 1977. Crossbreeding swine in Canada. World review of animal production, vol XIII, 4:9-30. |
11 | Gegner, L. 2004. Hog production alternatives. ATTRA's Organic Matters Series. |
12 | Hasty, J. L., E. van Heugten, M. T. See and D. K. Larick. 2002. Effect of vitamin E on improving fresh pork quality in Berkshire-sired and Hampshire-sired pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:3230-3237. |
13 | Honeyman, M. S. 2005. Extensive bedded indoor and outdoor pig production systems in USA: current trends and effects on animal care and product quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 94:15-24. DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Honeyman, M. S. and J. D. Harmon. 2003. Performance of finishing pigs in hoop structures and confinement during winter and summer. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1663-1670. |
15 | Young, R. J. and A. B. Lawrence. 1994. Feeding behaviour of pigs in groups monitored by a computerized feeding system. Anim. Prod. 58:145-152. DOI |
16 | Honeyman, M. S., R. S. Pirog, G. H. Huber, P. J. Lammers and J. R. Hermann. 2006. The United States pork niche market phenomenon. J. Anim. Sci. 84:2269-2275. DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Kleinbeck, S. N. and J. J. McGlone. 1999. Intensive indoor versus outdoor swine production systems: Genotype and supplemental iron effects on blood hemoglobin and selected immune measures in young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 77:2384-2390. |
18 | Thornton, K. 1990. Outdoor pig production. Farming Press, Ipswich, UK. |
19 | Winters, L. M., R. E. Comstock and D. L. Dailey. 1943. The development of an inbred line of swine (Minn. No. 1) from a Crossbred Foundation. J. Anim. Sci. 2:129-137. |
20 | Wood, J. D., G. R. Nute, R. I. Richardson, F. M. Whittington, O. Southwood, G. Plastow, R. Mansbridge, N. da Costa and K. C. Chang. 2004. Effects of breed, diet and muscle on fat deposition and eating quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 67:651-667. DOI ScienceOn |
21 | Casey, D. S. and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2001. Dealing with errors in data from electronic swine feeders. http://www.extension. iastate.edu/ipic/reports/01swinereports/Breedphys01.html |
22 | Aziz, N. 2004. Manipulating pork quality through production and pre-slaughter handling. Adv. Pork Prod. 15:245-251. |