Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10401

Factors Influencing Genetic Change for Milk Yield within Farms in Central Thailand  

Sarakul, M. (Department of Animal Science, Kasetsart University)
Koonawootrittriron, S. (Department of Animal Science, Kasetsart University)
Elzo, M.A. (Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida)
Suwanasopee, T. (Department of Animal Science, Kasetsart University)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.24, no.8, 2011 , pp. 1031-1040 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize factors influencing genetic improvement of dairy cattle for milk production at farm level. Data were accumulated from 305-day milk yields and pedigree information from 1,921 first-lactation dairy cows that calved from 1990 to 2007 on 161 farms in Central Thailand. Variance components were estimated using average information restricted maximum likelihood procedures. Animal breeding values were predicted by an animal model that contained herd-year-season, calving age, and regression additive genetic group as fixed effects, and cow and residual as random effects. Estimated breeding values from cows that calved in a particular month were used to estimate genetic trends for each individual farm. Within-farm genetic trends (b, regression coefficient of farm milk production per month) were used to classify farms into 3 groups: i) farms with negative genetic trend (b<-0.5 kg/mo), ii) farms with no genetic trend (-0.5 kg/$mo{\leq}b{\leq}0.5$ kg/mo), and iii) farms with positive genetic trend (b>0.5 kg/mo). Questionnaires were used to gather information from individual farmers on educational background, herd characteristics, farm management, decision making practices, and opinion on dairy farming. Farmer's responses to the questionnaire were used to test the association between these factors and farm groups using Fisher's exact test. Estimated genetic trend for the complete population was $0.29{\pm}1.02$ kg/year for cows. At farm level, most farms (40%) had positive genetic trend ($0.63{\pm}4.67$ to $230.79{\pm}166.63$ kg/mo) followed by farms with negative genetic trend (35%; $-173.68{\pm}39.63$ to $-0.62{\pm}2.57$ kg/mo) and those with no genetic trend (25%; $-0.52{\pm}3.52$ to $0.55{\pm}2.68$ kg/mo). Except for educational background (p<0.05), all other factors were not significantly associated with farm group.
Keywords
Tropic; Dairy Cattle; Dairy Farmer; Selection; Breeding;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 2
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sanpote, J. and S. Buaban. 2003. Genetic evaluation of production traits for dairy cattle in Thailand. Thai J. Vet. 33:80-90.
2 Sarakul, M., S. Koonawootrittriron, T. Suwanasopee, A. Hirunwong and T. Thongprapi. 2009. Situation of production and attitude for sire selection of dairy farmers in Thailand (2008). In: Proceeding of the 47nd Kasetsart University Annual Conference, March 17-21, 2009. Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 174- 181.
3 Sargent, F. D., V. H. Lytton and O. G. Wall Jr.. 1968. Test interval method of calculating dairy herd improvement association records. J. Dairy Sci. 51:170-179.   DOI
4 SAS. 2003. SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
5 Seangjun, A., S. Koonawootrittriron and M. A. Elzo. 2009. Characterization of lactation patterns and milk yield in a multibreed dairy cattle population in the central Thailand. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 43:74-82.
6 Visscher, P. M. and M. E. Goddard. 1995. Genetic analysis of profit for Australian dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 61:9-18.   DOI
7 Yeamkong, S., S. Koonawootrittriron, M. A. Elzo and T. Suwanasopee. 2010a. Effect of experience, education, record keeping, labor and decision making on monthly milk yield and revenue of dairy farms supported by a private organization in Central Thailand. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 23:814-824.   DOI
8 Yeamkong, S., S. Koonawootrittriron, M. A. Elzo and T. Suwanasopee. 2010b. Milk quantity, quality and revenue in dairy farms supported by a private organization in Central Thailand. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 22 (02), Article # 033. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/2/yeam22033.htm
9 Koonawootrittriron, S., M. A. Elzo, S. Tumwasorn and K. Nithichai. 2002. Estimation of covariance components and prediction of additive genetic effects for first lactation 305-d milk and fat yields in a Thai multibreed dairy population. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 35:245-258.
10 Koonawootrittriron, S., M. A. Elzo, P. Sopanarat, S. Tumwasorn, T. Thongprapi, C. Chaimongkol and K. Nithichai. 2004. A case study on phenotypic and genetic trends for first lactation productions of a multibreed dairy population in Thailand. In: Proceeding of the 42nd Kasetsart University Annual Conference, February 3-6, 2004. Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 146- 154.
11 Koonawootrittriron, S., M. A. Elzo and T. Thongprapi. 2009. Genetic trends in a Holstein${\times}$Other breeds multibreed dairy population in central Thailand. Livest. Prod. Sci. 122:186-192.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Legates, J. E. and R. M. Myers. 1988. Measuring genetic change in a dairy herd using a control population. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1025-1033.   DOI
13 Meinert, T. R. and R. E. Pearson. 1992. Estimates of genetic trend in an artificial insemination progeny test program and their association with herd characteristic. J. Dairy Sci. 75:2254- 2264.   DOI
14 Muir, B. L., J. Fatehi and L. R. Schaeffer. 2004. Genetic relationships between persistency and reproductive performance in first-lactation Canadian Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3029-3037.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Perez-Cabal, M. A., C. Garcia, O. Gonzalez-Recio and R. Alenda. 2006. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among locomotion type traits, profit, production, longevity, and fertility in Spanish dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1776-1783.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Rhone, J. A., S. Koonawootrittriron and M. A. Elzo. 2008. Record keeping, genetic selection, educational experience and farm management effects on average milk yield per cow, milk fat percentage, bacterial score and bulk tank somatic cell count of dairy farms in the Central region of Thailand. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 40:627-636.   DOI
17 Agresti, A. 1992. A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Stat. Sci. 7:131-153.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Burnside, E. B., G. B. Jansen, G. Civati and E. Dadati. 1992. Observed and theoretical genetic trends in a large dairy population under intensive selection. J. Dairy Sci. 75:2242- 2253.   DOI
19 Dairy Farming Promotion Organization. 2009. DPO Sire and Dam Summary 2009. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives.Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 1-56.
20 Department of Livestock Development. 2008. DLD Dairy Sire Summary 2008. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 1-55.
21 Department of Livestock Development. 2009. Livestock infrastructure information in Thailand: 2009. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative. Bangkok, Thailand.
22 Gilmour, A. R., B. R. Cullis, S. J. Welham and R. Thompson. 2000. ASREML Reference Manual. NSW Agric., Australia.
23 Jakobsen, J. H., P. Madsen, J. Jensen, J. Pedersen, L. G. Christensen and D. A. Sorensen. 2002. Genetic parameter for milk production and persistency for Danish Holsteins estimated in random regression models using REML. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1607-1616.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Konig, S., N. Chongkasikit and H. J. Langholz. 2005. Estimation of variance components for production and fertility traits in Northern Thai dairy cattle to define optimal breeding strategies. Arch. Tierz., Dummerstorf. 48:233-246.
25 Koonawootrittriron, S., M. A. Elzo, S. Tumwasorn and W. Sintala. 2001. Prediction of 100-d and 305-d milk yields in a multibreed dairy herd in Thailand using monthly test-day records. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 34:163-174.