Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90400

The Effect of Stocking Density on Stress Related Genes and Telomeric Length in Broiler Chickens  

Beloor, J. (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Jinju National University)
Kang, H.K. (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Jinju National University)
Kim, Y.J. (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Jinju National University)
Subramani, V.K. (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Jinju National University)
Jang, I.S. (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Jinju National University)
Sohn, S.H. (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Jinju National University)
Moon, Yang Soo (Department of Animal Science & Biotechnology, Jinju National University)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.23, no.4, 2010 , pp. 437-443 More about this Journal
Abstract
To be economically profitable, the poultry industry demands an increase in stocking density, which could adversely affect chicken welfare. The current study was performed to investigate the effect of stocking density on stress-related, heat shock protein genes (HSP70 and HSP90), 3-hydroxyl-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) gene and telomere length in broiler chickens. Seven-day-old broiler chickens were housed at High (0.0578 $m^2$/bird), Standard (0.077 $m^2$/bird) and Low (0.116 $m^2$/bird) stocking densities with 8 replicates each until 35 d of age. The growth performance, such as body weight gain and average daily feed intake, was found to be significantly (p<0.05) higher in the Low density group, but these parameters did not show any difference between the High and Standard groups. Other growth performance, such as feed conversion ratio and final feed intake, showed no difference among the treated groups. The expression levels of HSP70 and HMGCR were found to be elevated with the increase of stocking density. The expression level of these genes was significantly (p<0.05) higher in the High density stocked group compared with the other groups, whereas the expression levels were not significantly different between the Low and Standard groups. The expression levels of HSP90 did not show any significant changes among the treated groups. The telomeric length of the birds housed in High density was reduced significantly (p<0.05) when compared to that of the birds in Low density. These results clearly indicate that birds stocked at high density show physiological adaptive changes indicative of stress at gene transcriptional and telomere levels.
Keywords
Chicken; Stress; Heat Shock Proteins; Telomere;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 4  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 8
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cravener, T. L., W. B. Roush and M. M. Mashaly. 1992. Broiler production under varying population-densities. Poult. Sci. 71:427-433   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Estevez, I. 2007. Density allowances for broilers: where to set the limits? Poult. Sci. 86:1265-1272   PUBMED
3 Feddes, J. J. R., E. J. Emmanuel and M. J. Zuidhof. 2002. Broiler performance, BW variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poult. Sci. 81:774-779   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Heckert, R. A., I. Estevez, E. Russek-Cohen and R. Pettit-Riley. 2002. Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 81:451-457   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Hong, Y. H., Y. Nishimura, D. Hishikawa, H. Tsuzuki, H. Miyahara, C. Gotoh, K. C. Choi, D. D. Feng, C. Chen, H. G. Lee, K. Katoh, S. G. Roh and S. Sasaki. 2005. Acetate and propionate short chain fatty acids stimulate adipogenesis via GPCR43. Endocrinology 146:5092-5099   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Martrenchar, A., D. Huonnic, J. P. Cotte, E. Boilletot and J. P. Morisse. 2000. Influence of stocking density, artificial dusk and group size on the perching behaviour of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:125-130   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Proudfoot, F. G., H. W. Hulan and D. R. Ramey. 1979. Effect of 4 stocking densities on broiler carcass grade, the incidence of breast blisters, and other performance traits. Poult. Sci. 58:791-793   DOI
8 Sohn, S. H., E. J. Cho., W. J. Son and C. Y. Lee. 2007. Diagnosis of bovine freemartinism by fluorescence in situ hybridization on interphase nuclei using a bovine Y chromosome specific DNA probe. Theriogenology 68:1003-1011   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Zulkifli, I. and A. Sti Nor Azah. 2004. Fear and stress reactions, and the performance of commercial broiler chickens subjected to regular pleasant and unpleasant contacts with human being. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 88:77-87   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Bilgili, S. F. and J. B. Hess. 1995. Placement density influences broiler carcass grade and meat yields. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 4:384-389
11 Turkyilmaz, M. K. 2006. The effect of stocking density on stress reaction in broiler chickens during summer Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. (1):31-36
12 Zager, R. A. and A. Johnson. 2001. Renal cortical cholesterol accumulation is integral component of the systemic stress response. Kidney Int. 60:2299-2310   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Houben, M. J., J. J. Moonen, J. van Schooten and J. Hageman. 2007. Telomere length assessment: Biomarker of chronic oxidative stress? Free Radic. Biol. Med. 44:235-246   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Von Zglinicki, T. 2002. Oxidative stress shortens telomeres. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27:339-344   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Pettit-Riley, R. and I. Estevez. 2001. Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 71:127-140   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Sanotra, G. S., L. G. Lawson and K. S. Vestergaard. 2001. Influence of stocking density on tonic immobility, lameness, and tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 4:71-87   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hermesz, E., A. Magdolna and J. Nemcsok. 2001. Identification of two hsp90 genes in carp. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C 129: 397-407   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Dozier, W. A., J. P. Thaxton, S. L. Branton, G. W. Morgan, D. M. Miles, W. B. Roush, B. D. Lott and Y. Vizzier-Thaxton. 2005b. Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poult. Sci. 84:1332-1338   PUBMED   ScienceOn
19 Ekstrand, C., B. Algers and J. Svedberg. 1997. Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Prev. Vet. Med. 31:167-174   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Estevez, I., R. C. Newberry and L. Arias de Reyna. 1997. Broiler chickens: A tolerant social system? Etologia 5:19-29
21 Schlesinger, J. M. 1986. Heat shock proteins. J. Cell Biol. 103:321-325   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
22 Shanawany, M. M. 1988. Broiler performance under high stocking densities. Br. Poult. Sci. 29:43-52   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
23 Basu, N. and A. E. Todgham. 2002. Heat shock protein genes and their functional significance in fish. Gene 295(2):173-183   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Gornati, R., E. Papis, R. Simona, T. Genciana, S. Marco and B. Giovanni. 2004. Rearing density influences the expression of stress-related genes in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax, L.). Gene 341:111-118   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
25 Von Zglinicki, T., G. Saretzki, W. Docke and C. Lotze. 1995. Mild hyperoxia shortens telomeres and inhibits proliferation of fibroblasts: a model for senescence? Exp. Cell Res. 220:186-193   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Heishman, J. O., C. O. Cunningham and T. B. Clark. 1952. Floor space requirement of broilers. Poult. Sci. 31:920
27 Martrenchar, A., J. P. Morisse, D. Huonnic and J. P. Cotte. 1997. Influence of stocking density on some behavioural, physiological, and productivity traits of broilers. Vet. Res. 28:473-480   PUBMED   ScienceOn
28 Tomhave, A. E. and K. C. Seeger. 1945. Floor space requirements of broilers. Delaware Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 255
29 Bolton, W., R. Thompson, R. M. Jones and W. A. Dewar. 1972. Effect of stocking density on performance of broiler chicks. Br. Poult. Sci. 13:157-162   DOI   ScienceOn