1 |
Tufarelli, V., E. Cazzato, A. Ficco and V. Laudadio. 2010. Assessing nutritional value and in vitro digestibility of Mediterranean pasture species using yak (Bos grunniens) faeces as alternative microbial inoculum in a incubator. J. Food Agric. Environ. 8:477-481.
|
2 |
Van Soest, P. J. and J. B. Robertson. 1985. Analysis of forages and fibrous feeds. In: Laboratory Manual for Animal Science 613. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
|
3 |
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3592.
DOI
|
4 |
Varadyova, Z., M. Baran and I. Zelenak. 2005. Comparison of two in vitro fermentation gas production methods using both rumen fluid and faecal inoculum from sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 123-124:81-94.
|
5 |
Wilman, D. and A. Adesogan. 2000. A comparison of filter bag methods with conventional tube methods of determining the in vitro digestibility of forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 84:33-47.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Mauricio, R. M., E. Owen, F. L. Mould, I. Givens, M. K. Theodorou, J. France, D. R. Davies and M. S. Dhanoa. 2001. Comparison of bovine rumen liquor and bovine faeces as inoculum for an in vitro gas production technique for evaluating forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 89:33-48.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Minson, D. J. 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press Inc. San Diego, USA.
|
8 |
Omed, H. M., D. K. Lovett and R. F. E. Axford. 2000. Faeces as a source of microbial enzymes for estimating digestibility. In: Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition (D. I. Givens, E. Owen, H. M. Omed and R. F. E. Axford). CAB International, Wallingford.
|
9 |
Murray, J. M. D., A. Longland and C. Dunnett. 2008. Effect of yeast supplementation on the in vitro fermentation of hightemperature dried lucerne incubated with an equine faecal inoculum. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 146:149-159.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
|
11 |
Sarkar, M., H. H. D. Meyer and B. S. Prakash. 2006. Is the yak (Poephagus grunniens L.) really a seasonal breeder? Theriogenology 65:721-730.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
SAS. 2000. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 8.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
|
13 |
Spanghero, M., S. Boccalon, L. Gracco and L. Gruber. 2003. NDF degradability of hays measured in situ and in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 104:201-208.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Tilley, J. M. and R. A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 18:104-111.
DOI
|
15 |
Adesogan, A. T. 2005. Effect of bag type on the apparent digestibility of feeds in ANKOM DaisyII incubators. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 119:333-344.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Bovolenta, S., M. Spanghero, S. Dovier, D. Orlandi and F. Clementel. 2008. Chemical composition and net energy content of alpine pasture species during the grazing season. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 146:178-191.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Lattimer, J. M., S. R. Cooper, D. W. Freeman and D. L. Lalman. 2007. Effect of yeast culture on in vitro fermentation of a highconcentrate or high-fiber diet using equine fecal inoculum in a DaisyII incubator. J. Anim. Sci. 85:2484-2491.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Dong, Q. M., X. Q. Zhao, Y. S. Ma, S. X. Xu and Q. Y. Li. 2006. Live-weight gain, apparent digestibility, and economic benefits of yaks fed different diets during winter on the Tibetan plateau. Livest. Sci. 101:199-207.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.
|
20 |
Holden, L. A. 1999. Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. J. Dairy Sci. 82:1791-1794.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Laudadio, V., G. M. Lacalandra, D. Monaco, T. Khorchani, M. Hammadi and V. Tufarelli. 2009. Faecal liquor as alternative microbial inoculum source for in vitro (DaisyII) technique to estimate the digestibility of feeds for camels. J. Camelid Sci. 2:1-7.
|
22 |
Mabjeesh, S. J., M. Cohen and A. Arieli. 2000. In vitro methods for measuring the dry matter digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs: Comparison of methods and inoculum source. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2289-2294.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th ed. Arlington, VA, USA.
|