Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.70047

Evaluation of Genetic Variation and Phylogenetic Relationship among North Indian Cattle Breeds  

Sharma, Rekha (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Pandey, A.K. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Singh, Y. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Prakash, B. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Mishra, B.P. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Kathiravan, P. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Singh, P.K. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Singh, G. (National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.22, no.1, 2009 , pp. 13-19 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the present study, genetic analyses of diversity and differentiation were performed on four breeds of Indian zebu cattle (Bos indicus). In total, 181 animals belonging to Ponwar, Kherigarh, Gangatiri and Kenkatha breeds were genotyped for 20 cattle specific microsatellite markers. Mean number of alleles observed per locus (MNA) varied between 5.75 (Kenkatha) to 6.05 (Kherigarh). The observed and expected heterozygosity for the breeds varied from 0.48 (Gangatiri) to 0.58 (Kherigarh) and 0.65 (Kenkatha) to 0.70 (Kherigarh), respectively. $F_{IS}$ estimates of all the breeds indicated significant deficit of heterozygotes being 28.8%, 25.9%, 17.7% and 17.7% for Gangatiri, Ponwar, Kherigarh and Kenkatha, respectively. The $F_{ST}$ estimates demonstrated that 10.6% was the average genetic differentiation among the breeds. Nei's genetic distance DA and Cavalli- Sforza and Edwards Chord distance ($D_C$) and the phylogenetic tree constructed from these reflected the close genetic relationship of Gangatiri and Kenkatha, whereas Ponwar appears to be more distant.
Keywords
Cattle; Genetic Variation; India; Microsatellite;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 5
연도 인용수 순위
1 Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP: Phylogeny inference package. Version 3.5p, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle,WA
2 Mukesh, M., M. Sodhi, S. Bhatia and B. P. Mishra. 2004. Genetic diversity of Indian native cattle breeds as analyzed with 20 microsatellites. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 121:416-424   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genet. 89:583-590   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Weir, B. S. and C. C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evol. 38:1358-1370   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Barker, J. S. F. 1999. Conservation of livestock breed diversity. AGRI. 25:33-43
6 Blott, S. C., J. L. Williams and C. S. Haley. 1998. Genetic variation within the Hereford breed of cattle. Anim. Genet. 29:202-211   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Naveen Kumar, S., C. S. Nagaraja, M. G. Govindaiah, S. M. Saravanan and K. Karthickeyan. 2006. Molecular characterization of hallikar breed of cattle using microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:622-626
8 Acharya, R. M. and P. N. Bhat. 1984. Livestock and poultry genetic resources of India. IVRI, Research Bulletin No. 1, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, U.P. India
9 Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genet. 155:945-959
10 MacHugh, D. E., R. T. Loftus, P. Cunningham and D. G. Bradley. 1998. Genetic structure of seven European cattle breeds assessed using 20 microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 29:333-340   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Dieringer, D. and C. Schlotterer. 2003. MICROSATELLITE ANANLYZER (MSA): A platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Molecular Ecology Notes 3:167-169   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Nei, M. 1976. Mathematical models of speciation and genetic distance. In: Population genetics and ecology (Ed. S. Karlin and E. Nevo). pp. 723-766. Academic press, New York
13 Yeh, Francis C., R-C Yang, B. J. Boyle Timothy, Z-H Ye and Judy X. Mao. 1999. POPGENE version 1.32, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Canada. (http://www.ualberta.ca/-fyeh/fyeh)
14 Bradley, D. G., D. G. Mac Hugh, R. T. Loftus, R. S. Sow, C. H. Hoste and E. P. Cunningham. 1994. Zebu-taurine variation in Y chromosome DNA: a sensitive assay for introgression in West African trypnotolerant cattle populations. Anim. Genet. 25:7-12   PUBMED
15 Goldstein, D. V., A. Ruiz-Linares, L. L. Cavalla-Sforza and M. W. Heldman. 1995. Genetic absolute dating based on the origin of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92:6723-6727   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, NewYork
17 Schmid, M., N. Saitbekova, C. Gaillard and G. Dolf. 1999. Genetic diversity in Swiss cattle breeds. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 116:1-8   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Barker, J. S. F., S. S. Moore, D. J. S. Hetzel, D. Evans, S. G. Tan and K. Byrne. 1997. Genetic diversity of Asian water buffalo (Bubalis bubalis): microsatellite variation and a comparison with protein coding loci. Anim. Genet. 28:103-115
19 Shriver, M. D., L. Jin, E. Boerwinkle, R. Deka, R. E. Ferrell and R. Chakraborty. 1995. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci. Genet. 12:914-920   DOI
20 Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis models and estimation procedure. Am. J. Human Genet. 19:233-257   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
21 Livestock Census. 2003. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Govt. of India
22 Pandey, A. K., R. Sharma, Y. Singh, B. Prakash and S. P. S. Ahlawat. 2006. Evaluation of genetic variability in kenkatha cattle by microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1685-1690
23 Nei, M. 1983. Genetic polymorphism and the role of nutrition in evolution. In: Evolution of genes and proteins (Ed. M. Nei and R. Koehn). pp. 165-190. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates
24 Page, R. D. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 12:357-358   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Sodhi, M., M. Mukesh, B. P. Mishra, K. R. Mitkari, B. Prakash and S. P. S. Ahlawat. 2005. Evaluation of Genetic differentiation in Bos indicus cattle breeds from Marathwada region of India using microsatellite polymorphism. Anim. Biotech. 16:127-137   DOI
26 Kantanen, J., I. Olsaker, L. E. Holm, S. Lian, J. Vilkki, K. Brusgaard, E. Eythorsdottir, B. Danell and S. Adalsteinsson. 2000. Genetic diversity and population structure of 20 North European cattle breeds. J. Hered. 91:446-457   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Takazaki, N. and M. Nei. 1996 Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genet. 144:389-399   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Edwards, C., G. Dolf, C. Looft, R. Loftus and D. Bradley. 2000. Relationship between the endangered Pustertaler-Sprinzen and three related European cattle breeds as analyzed with 20 microsatellite loci. Anim. Genet. 31:329-332   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Crawford, A. M. and R. P. Cuthbertson. 1996. Mutations in sheep microsatellites. Genome Res. 6:876-879   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Maniatis, T., J. Sambrook and E. F. Fritish. 1982. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
31 Goudet, J. 1995. FSTAT (version1.2): A computer programme to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86:485-486
32 Bassam, B. J., G. Coetano-Anolles and P. M. Gresshoff. 1991. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 196:80-83   DOI   ScienceOn