Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70641

Maternal and Direct Genetic Parameters for Production Traits and Maternal Correlations among Production and Feed Efficiency Traits in Duroc Pigs  

Hoque, M.A. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Agricultural Science Tohoku University)
Kadowaki, H. (Miyagi Prefecture Animal Industry Experiment Station, Tamatsukuri-gun)
Shibata, T. (Miyagi Prefecture Animal Industry Experiment Station, Tamatsukuri-gun)
Suzuki, K. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Agricultural Science Tohoku University)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.21, no.7, 2008 , pp. 961-966 More about this Journal
Abstract
Direct and maternal genetic parameters for production traits in 1,642 pigs and maternal genetic correlations among production (1,642 pigs) and feed efficiency (380 boars) traits were estimated in 7 generations of a Duroc population. Traits studied were daily gain (DG), intramuscular fat (IMF), loineye area (LEA), backfat thickness (BF), daily feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and residual feed intake (RFI). The RFI was calculated as the difference between actual and predicted feed intake. The predicted feed intake was estimated by adjusting the initial test weight, DG and BF. Data for production traits were analyzed using four alternative animal models (including direct, direct+maternal permanent environmental, or direct+maternal genetic+maternal permanent environmental effects). Direct heritability estimates from the model including direct and all maternal effects were $0.41{\pm}0.04$ for DG, $0.27{\pm}0.04$ for IMF, $0.52{\pm}0.06$ for LEA and $0.64{\pm}0.04$ for BF. Estimated maternal heritabilities ranged from $0.04{\pm}0.04$ to $0.15{\pm}0.05$ for production traits. Antagonistic relationships were observed between direct and maternal genetic effects ($r_{am}$) for LEA (-0.21). Maternal genetic correlations of feed efficiency traits with FI ($r_g$ of FI with FCR and RFI were $0.73{\pm}0.06$ and $0.90{\pm}0.05$, respectively) and LEA (rg of LEA with FCR and RFI were $-0.48{\pm}0.05$ to $-0.61{\pm}0.05$, respectively) were favorable. The estimated moderate genetic correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects for IMF and LEA indicated that maternal effects has an important role in these traits, and should be accounted for in the genetic evaluation system.
Keywords
Genetic Parameters; Growth and Feed Efficiency; Maternal Effects;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Roehe, R. and B. W. Kennedy. 1993. Effect of selection for maternal and direct genetic effects on genetic improvement of litter size in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2891-2904.   DOI
2 Suzuki, K., H. Kadowaki, T. Shibata, H. Uchida and A. Nishida. 2005. Selection for daily gain, loin-eye area, backfat thickness and intramuscular fat based on desired gains over seven generations of Duroc pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 97:193-202.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Gilbert, H., J. P. Bidanel, J. Gruand, J. C. Caritez, Y. Billon, P. Guillouet, H. Lagant, J. Noblet and P. Sellier. 2007. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits. J. Anim. Sci. 85:3182-3188.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Hoque, M. A., K. Suzuki, H. Kadowaki, T. Shibata and T. Oikawa. 2007. Genetic parameters for feed efficiency and their relationships with growth and carcass traits in Duroc pigs. J. Anim. Breed. Gen. 124:108-116.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Knapp, P., A. Willam and J. Solkner. 1997. Genetic parameters for lean meat content and meat quality traits in different pig breeds. Livest. Prod. Sci. 52:69-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Koch, R. M., M. E. Dikeman, H. Grodzki, J. D. Crouse and L. V. Candiff. 1983. Individual and maternal genetic effects for beef carcass traits of breeds representing diverse biological types (cycle 1). J. Anim. Sci. 57:1124-1132.   DOI
7 Li, X. and B. W. Kennedy. 1994. Genetic parameters for growth rate and backfat in Canadian Yorkshire, Landrace, Duroc, and Hampshire pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1450-1454.   DOI
8 Meyer, K., M. J. Carrick and B. J. P. Donnelly. 1993. Genetic parameters for growth traits of Australian beef cattle from a multibreed selection experiment. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2614-2622.   DOI
9 Lykins, L. E., J. K. Bertrand, J. F. Baker and T. E. Kiser. 2000. Maternal birth weight breeding value as an additional factor to predict calf birth weight in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 78:21-26.   DOI
10 Maniatis, N. and G. E. Pollott. 2002. Maternal effects on weight and ultrasonically measured traits of lambs in a small closed Suffilk flock. Small Rumin. Res. 45:235-246.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Johnson, Z. B., J. J. Chewning and R. A. Nugent. 1998. Genetic parameters for performance traits of boars in a population of Large White swine with primary selection emphasis on maternal traits. J. Anim. Sci. 76(Suppl.):151(Abstr.).
12 Hoque, M. A., P. F. Arthur, K. Hiramoto and T. Oikawa. 2006. Genetic relationship between different measures of feed efficiency and its component traits in Japanese Black (Wagyu) bulls. Livest. Sci. 99:111-118.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Johnson, Z. B., J. J Chewning and R. A. Nugent. 2002. Maternal effects on traits measured during postweaning performance test of swine from four breeds. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1470-1477.   DOI
14 Willham, R. L. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding: III. Biometrical aspects of maternal effects in animals. J. Anim. Sci. 35:1288-1293.   DOI
15 Neumaier, A. and S. L. Groeneveld. 1998. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genet. Sel. Evol. 30:3-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Bereskin, B. 1986. A genetic analysis of feed conversion efficiency and associated traits in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 62:910-917.   DOI
17 Crews, D. H. and R. A. Kemp. 1998. Maternal (co)variance components for carcass traits breeding values among crossbred beef cattle. Proc. 6th Worl. Cong. Gen. Appl. Livest. Prod. 23:177-180.
18 Ferraz, J. B. S. and R. K. Johnson. 1993. Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of Large White and Landrace swine. J. Anim. Sci. 71:850-858.   DOI
19 Bryner, S. M., J. W. Mabry, J. K. Bertrand, L. L. Benyshek and L. A. Kriese. 1992. Estimation of direct and maternal heritability and genetic correlation for backfat and growth rate in swine using data from centrally tested Yorkshire boars. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1755-1759.   DOI
20 Agapita, J. S., K. S. Seo, K. H. Cho, S. D. Kim and Y. C. Lee. 2006. Genetic parameter estimation of carcass traits of Duroc predicted using ultrasound scanning modes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1379-1383.   과학기술학회마을   DOI