Browse > Article

Genetic Relationship of Gestation Length with Birth and Weaning Weight in Hanwoo (Bos Taurus Coreanae)  

Hwang, J.M. (Animal Genetic Improvement Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
Choi, J.G. (Animal Genetic Improvement Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
Kim, H.C. (Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science)
Choy, Y.H. (Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science)
Kim, S. (Animal Genetic Improvement Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
Lee, C. (Ilsong Institute of Life Science, Hallym University)
Kim, J.B. (Animal Genetic Improvement Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.21, no.5, 2008 , pp. 633-639 More about this Journal
Abstract
The genetic relationship of gestation length (GL) with birth and weaning weight (BW, WW) was investigated using data collected from the Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Republic of Korea. Analytical mixed models including birth year‐season, sex of calf, linear and quadratic covariates of age of dam (days) and linear covariate of age at weaning (days) as fixed effects were used. Corresponding restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian estimates of variance components and heritability were obtained with two models; Model 1 included only direct genetic effect and Model 2 included direct genetic, maternal genetic and permanent environmental effect. All the genetic parameter estimates from REML were corresponding to the Bayesian estimates. Direct heritability estimates for GL, BW, and WW were 0.48, 0.33 and 0.25 by Model 1. From Model 2, direct and maternal heritability estimates were 0.38 and 0.03 for GL, 0.14 and 0.05 for BW, and 0.08 and 0.05 for WW. Genetic correlation estimates between direct and maternal effects were 0.05 for GL, 0.59 for BW, and 0.52 for WW. Estimates of direct genetic correlation between GL and BW (WW) were 0.44 (0.21). Positive genetic correlation of GL with BW and WW imply that selection for greater BW or WW would lead to prolonged gestation length.
Keywords
Gestation Length; Birth Weight; Weaning Weight; Heritability; Genetic Correlation; Hanwoo;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hansen, M., M. S. Lund, J. Pedersen and L. G. Christensen. 2004. Gestation length in Danish Holsteins has weak genetic associations with stillbirth, calving difficulty, and calf size. Livest. Prod. Sci. 91:23-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Groeneveld, E., B. E. Mostert and T. Rust. 1998. The covariance structure of growth traits in the Afrikaner beef population. Livest. Prod. Sci. 55:99-107.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Gutierrez, J. P., F. Goyache, I. Fernandez, I. Alvarez and L. J. Royo. 2007. Genetic relationships among calving ease, calving interval, birth weight, and weaning weight in the Austriana de los Valles beef cattle breed. J. Anim. Sci. 85:69-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 MacNeil, M. D., R. E. Short and E. E. Grings. 2001. Characterization of topcross progenies from Hereford, Limousine, and Piedmontese sires. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1751-1756.   DOI
5 Meyer, K. 1992. Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Australian beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 31:179-204.   DOI
6 Lasley, J. F., B. N. Day and J. E. Comfort. 1961. Some genetic aspects of gestation length, and birth and weaning weights in Hereford cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 20:737-741.   DOI
7 Cheong, H. S., D. H. Yoon, L. H. Kim, B. L. Park, H. W. Lee, S. Namgoong, E. M. Kim, E. R. Chung, I. Cheong and H. S. Shin. 2008. Association analysis between insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) polymorphisms and carcass traits in cattle. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21:309-313.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
8 Bennet, G. L. and K. E. Gregory. 2001. Genetic (co)variances for calving difficulty score in composite and parental populations of beef cattle: II. Reproductive, skeletal, and carcass traits. J. Anim. Sci. 79:52-59.   DOI
9 Boldman, K. G., L. A. Kriese, L. D. Van Vleck, C. P. Van Tassell, and S. D. Kachman. 1995. A manual for use of MTDFREML: A set of programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariances. ARS, USDA, Washington, DC. Bourdon, R. M. and J. S. Brinks. 1982.
10 Aziz, M. A., S. Nishida, K. Suzuki and A. Nishida. 2005. Estimation of direct and maternal genetic and permanent environmental effects for weights from birth to 356 days of age in a herd of Japanese Black cattle using random regression. J. Anim. Sci. 83:519-530.   DOI
11 Crews, Jr., D. H. 2006. Age of dam and sex of calf adjustments and genetic parameters for gestation length in Charolais cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 84:25-31.   DOI
12 De Mattos, D., I. Misztal and J. K. Bertrand. 2000. Variance and covariance components for weaning weight for Herefords in three countries. J. Anim. Sci. 78:33-37.   DOI
13 Cundiff, L. V., K. E. Gregory and R. M. Koch. 1998. Germplasm evaluation in beef cattle-cycle IV: Birth and weaning traits. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2528-2535.   DOI
14 Duangjinda, M., J. K. Bertrand, I. Misztal and T. Druet. 2001. Estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances in Hereford, Gelvieh, and Charolais by Metod R. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2997-3001.   DOI
15 Gregory, K. E., L. V. Cundiff and R. M. Koch. 1995a. Genetic and phenotypic (co)variances for production traits of intact male populations of purebred and composite beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2227-2235.   DOI
16 Meyer, K. 2006. WOMBAT-A program for mixed model analyses by restricted maximum likelihood. User notes. Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, Armidale, p. 58.
17 Phocas, F. and D. Laloe. 2004. Genetic parameters for birth and weaning traits in French specialized beef cattle breeds. Livest. Prod. Sci. 89:121-128.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Paschal, J. C., J. O. Sanders and J. L. Ken. 1991. Calving and weaning characteristics of Angus-, Gray Brahman-, Gir-, Indu- Brazil-, Nellore-. and Red Brahman-sired F calves. J. Anim. Sci. 69:2395-2402.   DOI
19 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2007. The goals for animal mprovement. Official announcement 2007-20 (In Korean).
20 Newman, S., M. D. MacNeil, W. L. Reynolds, B. W. Knapp and J. J. Urick. 1993a. Fixed effects in the formation of a composite line of beef cattle: I. Experimental design and reproductive performance. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2026-2032.   DOI
21 Bennet, G. L. and K. E. Gregory. 1996. Genetic (co)variances among birth weight, and postweaning gain in composites and parental breeds of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2598-2611.   DOI
22 Bourdon, R. M. and J. S. Brinks. 1982. Gentic, environmental and phenotypic relationships among gestation length, birth weight, growth traits and age at first calving in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 55:543-553.   DOI
23 Lee, D. H., V. Choudhary and G. H. Lee. 2006. Genetic parameter estimates for ultrasonic meat qualities in Hanwoo cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:468-474.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
24 Dodenhoff, J., L. D. Van Vleck and D. E. Wilson. 1999. Comparison of models to estimate genetic effects for weaning weight of Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 77:3176-3184.   DOI
25 Ferreira, G. B., M. D. MacNeil and L. D. Van Vleck. 1999. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models. J. Anim. Sci. 77:2641-2650.   DOI
26 Gregory, K. E., L. V. Cundiff and R. M. Koch. 1995b. Genetic and phenotypic (co)variances for production traits of female populations of purebred and composite beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2235-2242.   DOI
27 Lee, C., C. P. Van Tassell and E. J. Pollak. 1997. Estimation of genetic variance and covariance components for weaning weight in simmental cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 75:325-330.   DOI
28 Wray, N. R., R. L. Quaas and E. J. Pollak. 1987. Analysis of gestation length in American Simmental cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 65:970-974.   DOI
29 Splan, R. K., L. V. Cundiff, M. E. Dikeman and L. D. Van Vleck. 2002. Estimates of parameters between direct and maternal genetic effects for weaning weight and direct genetic effects for carcass traits in crossbred cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80:3107-3111.   DOI
30 Van Tassell, C. P. and L. D. Van Vleck. 1996. Multiple-traits gibbs sampler for animal model: Flexible programs for Bayesian and likelihood-based (co)variance component inference. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2586-2597.   DOI
31 Waldron, D. F., C. A. Morris, R. L. Baker and D. H. Johnson. 1993. Maternal effects for growth traits in beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 34:57-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Newman, S., M. D. Macneil, W. L. Reynolds, B. W. Knapp and J. J. Uric. 1993b. Fixed effects in the formation of a composite line of beef cattle: II. Pre- and postweaning growth and carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2033-2039.   DOI
33 Reynolds, W. L., J. J. Urick and B. W. Knapp. 1990. Biological type effects on gestation length, calving traits and calf growth rate. J. Anim. Sci. 68:630-639.   DOI
34 Robinson, D. L. 1996. Estimation and interpretation of direct and maternal genetic parameter for weights of Australian Angus cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 45:1-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Snelling, W. M., M. D. Macneil, D. D. Kress, D. C. Anderson and W. M. Tess. 1996. Factors influencing genetic evaluation of linebred Hereford cattle in diverse environments. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1499-1510.   DOI
36 Nugent 3rd, R. A., D. R. Notter and W. E. Beal. 1991. Body measurements of newborn calves and relationship of calf shape to sire breeding values for birth weight and calving ease. J. Anim. Sci. 69:2413-2421.
37 Kim, J. B. and C. Lee. 2000. Historical look at the genetic improvement in Korean cattle. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1467-1481.   DOI
38 Koch, R. M., L. V. Cundiff, K. E. Gregory and L. D. Van Vleck. 2004. Genetic response to selection for weaning weight or yearling weight or yearling weight and muscle score in Hereford cattle: Efficiency of gain, growth, and carcass characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 82:668-682.   DOI
39 Hagger, C. and A. Hofer. 1990. Genetic analyses of calving traits in the Swiss Black and White, Braunvieh and Simmental breeds by REML and MAPP procedures. Livest. Prod. Sci. 24:93-107.   DOI   ScienceOn