1 |
Gaur, G. K., V. N. Tripathi, S. Mukherjee and V. K. Choudhary. 2001. Efficiency of sire evaluation procedures in Frieswal cattle. Indian J. Vet. Res. 10(2):1-6
|
2 |
Jain, A. and D. K. Sadana. 2000. Sire evaluation using animal model and conventional methods in Murrah buffaloes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13(9):1196-1200
DOI
|
3 |
Sahana, G. and M. Gurnani. 1999. Efficacy of auxiliary traits in estimation of breeding value of sires for milk production. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 12(4):511-514
DOI
|
4 |
Vij, P. K. and M. S. Tiwana. 1988. A note on evaluation of buffalo sires. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 41(4):500-501
|
5 |
Meyer, K. 1998. DFREML (Derivative Free Restricted Maximum Likelihood) Programme. Version 3.0 . User notes. University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
|
6 |
Sahana, G. 1996. Effectiveness of sire evaluation methods for milk production along with auxiliary traits vis-à-vis other methods in crossbred cattle. Ph.D. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Deemed University, Karnal, India
|
7 |
Singh, R. 1992. Genetic evaluation of Sahiwal bulls on the basis of daughter's multiple traits under selection. M.Sc. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Deemed University, Karnal, India
|
8 |
Gandhi, R. S. and M. Gurnani. 1991. Accuracy of different methods of sire evaluation in Sahiwal cattle. Indian Vet. J. 68(7):659-662
|
9 |
Singh, P. K. and B. P. Singh. 1999. Efficacy of different methods in genetic evaluation of Murrah sires. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69(12):1044-1047
|
10 |
Deulkar, P. B. and M. D. Kothekar. 1999. Sire evaluation considering first lactation yield for improvement of lifetime production in Sahiwal. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69(4):240-242
|
11 |
Henderson, C. R. 1975. Use of relationship among sires to increase accuracy of sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 58(11):1731-1738
DOI
|
12 |
Harvey, W. R. 1987. Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. ARS H-4, USDA, Washington, DC
|
13 |
Robertson, A. and J. M. Randel. 1954. The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination. J. Agric. Sci. 44:184-192
DOI
|
14 |
Parekh, H. B. and M. Singh. 1989. Efficiency of different procedures of dairy sire evaluation using crossbred progeny. Indian J. Dairy. Sci. 42(3):482-488
|
15 |
Tajane, K. R. and A. V. Rai. 1990. Efficiency of sire evaluation methods to improve milk yield of SahiwalxHolstein-Friesian cattle. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 60(1):183-191
|
16 |
Deb, S. M., M. Gurnani and C. T. Chacko. 1998. Comparison of sire evaluation methods under field conditions. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 51(4):210-215
|
17 |
Meyer, K. 1989. Restricted Maximum Likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative-free algorithm. Genet. Select. Evol. 21:317-340
DOI
|
18 |
Dempfle, L. 1977. Comparison of several sire evaluation methods in dairy cattle breeding. Livestock Prod. Sci. 4(2):129-139
DOI
ScienceOn
|