Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.909

Assessment of the Non All-in All-out System and the All-in All-out System for Sows and Their Suckling Piglets  

Jeon, J.H. (Division of Applied Life Science, Institute of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Graduate School Gyeongsang National University)
Yeon, S.C. (Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
Kim, S. (Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
Kim, D.H. (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Jinju National University)
Chang, H.H. (Division of Applied Life Science, Institute of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Graduate School Gyeongsang National University)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.19, no.6, 2006 , pp. 909-914 More about this Journal
Abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate the behavior of sows and their piglets reared using the non-all-in all-out system and the all-in all-out system during a 3-week lactation period. The 24 Landrace${\times}$Yorkshire sows (range of parity: 2 to 4) and their litters (range of litter size: 8 to 13 piglets) for each treatment (8 sows/replication) were used in this experiment. The sows were housed in farrowing crates ($0.6{\times}2.1m$) located in pens ($2.4{\times}1.8m$) with totally perforated metal flooring. The crates were kept in an experimental room that was thermostatically controlled to approximately $23^{\circ}C$. A 250-W infrared heat lamp was turned on above the creep area during lactation. The sows and piglets were conventionally managed. The animals were recorded during a 24-h period at 1, 4, 7, 14 and 21 days postpartum. The videotapes were scanned every minute to obtain an instantaneous behavioral sample. In the behaviors of sows, lateral recumbency decreased and ventral recumbency increased from 1 day postpartum to 21 days postpartum. In comparison to the AIAOS, sows in the NAIAOS spent much less time on lateral recumbency (p<0.01), whereas they spent much more time on ventral recumbency and sitting at 4 days postpartum (p<0.05 and p<0.05). In the behaviors of piglets, lying increased and unsuccessful suckling decreased until 21 days postpartum. Compared to the AIAOS at 4 days postpartum, piglets in the NAIAOS spent less time lying (p<0.01), whereas they spent much more time walking and unsuccessful suckling (p<0.01 and p<0.05). These results suggest that the all-in all-out system may be preferable to the non-all-in all-out system for promoting welfare.
Keywords
Sow; Piglet; Behavior; All-in all-out System; Welfare;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 Algers, B. and P. Jensen. 1985. Communication during suckling in the domestic pig: Effects of continuous noise. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 14:49-61   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Broom, D. M. 1991. Animal welfare: Concepts and measurement. J. Anim. Sci. 69:4167-4175   DOI
3 Fraser, D. 1978. Observations on the behavioural development of suckling and early-weaned piglets during the first six weeks after birth. Anim. Behav. 26:22-30   DOI
4 Gotz, M. 1991. Changes in nursing and suckling behaviour of sows and their piglets in farrowing crates. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 31:271-275   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Lewis, N. J. and J. F. Hurnik. 1986. An approach response of piglets to the sow's nursing vocalizations. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:537-539   DOI
6 Newberry, R. C. and D. G. M. Wood-Gush. 1985. The suckling behavior of domestic pigs in a semi-natural environment. Behaviour 95:11-25   DOI
7 Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Inc. 2000. User's Guide, Release 8.01, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC
8 Mahan, D. C. and A. J. Lepine. 1991. Effect of pig weaning weight and associated nursery feeding programs on subsequent performance to 105 kilograms body weight. J. Anim. Sci. 69:1370   DOI
9 Fahmy, M. H. and C. Bernard. 1971. Causes of mortality in Yorkshire pigs from birth to 20 weeks of age. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51:351-359   DOI
10 Jensen, P. 1986. Observations on the maternal behaviour of freeranging domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16:131-142   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lewis, N. J. and J. F. Hurnik. 1985. The development of nursing behaviour in swine. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 14:225-232   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Castren, H., B. Algers, P. Jensen and H. Saloniemi. 1989. Suckling behaviour and milk consumption in newborn piglets as a response to sow grunting. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 24:227-238   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Jensen, P. 1988. Maternal behaviour and mother-young interactions during lactation in free-ranging domestic pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 20:297-308   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Dyck, G. W. and E. E. Swierstra. 1987. Causes of piglet death from birth to weaning. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 67:543-547   DOI
15 Milligan, B. N., D. Fraser and D. L. Kramer. 2001. Birth weight variation in the domestic pig: Effects on offspring survival, weight gain and suckling behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73:179-191   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Stangel, G. and P. Jensen. 1991. Behaviour of semi-naturally kept sows and piglets (except suckling) during 10 days postpartum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 31:211-227   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Walser, E. E. S. 1986. Recognition of the sow's voice by neonatal piglets. Behaviour. 99:177-188   DOI
18 Bate, L. A., T. A. Van Lunen and K. Van Lunen. 1999. Use of nursing sounds to influence performance of piglets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79:577
19 Lou, Z. and J. F. Hurnik. 1998. Peripartum sows in three farrowing crates: Posture patterns and behavioural activities. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 58:77-86   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Spinka, M., G. Illmann, B. Algers and Z. Stetkova. 1997. The role of nursing frequency in milk production in domestic pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1223-1228
21 Jensen, P., G. Stangel and B. Algers. 1991. Nursing and suckling behaviour of semi-naturally kept pigs during the first 10 days postpartum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 31:195-209   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Fraser, D. 1980. A review of the behavioural mechanism of milk ejection of the domestic pig. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 6:247-255   DOI   ScienceOn
23 English, P. R. and V. Morrison. 1984. Causes and prevention of piglet mortality. Pig News Info. 5:369-376
24 Reese, D. C., T. G. Hartsock and W. E. Morgan Morrow. 2001. Pork Industry Handbook. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service. PIH-18. Purdue Univ., West Lafayette
25 Kasanen, S. and B. Algers. 2002. A note on the effects of additional sow gruntings on suckling behaviour in piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75:93-101   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Blackshaw, J. K., A. J. Swain, A. W. Blackshaw, F. J. M. Thomas, and K. J. Gillies. 1997. The development of playful behaviour in piglets from birth to weaning in three farrowing environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 55:37-49   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Algers, B. 1993. Nursing in pigs: Communicating needs and distributing resources. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2826-2831
28 Jeon, J. H., D. J. Kim, J. H. Han, S. C. Yeon and H. H. Chang. 2003. Behavioral recovery of sows and behavioral development of their piglets postpartum. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Korea) 45(6):1089-1096   DOI
29 Algers, B. and P. Jensen. 1991. Teat stimulation and milk production in early lactation of sows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71:51- 59   DOI