Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.892

The Nutritional Value of Brown Rice and Maize for Growing Pigs  

Li, X.L. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Yuan, S.L. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Piao, X.S. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Lai, C.H. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Zang, J.J. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Ding, Y.H. (College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University)
Han, L.J. (KLMPASI, China Agricultural University)
Han, In K. (Hans' Animal Life Science Foundation)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.19, no.6, 2006 , pp. 892-897 More about this Journal
Abstract
An experiment was designed to study the nutritional value of Chinese brown rice and maize for growing pigs. Six male grower pigs (Duroc${\times}$Landrace${\times}$Large White, $24.3{\pm}1.26$ kg average initial BW) were surgically fitted with a simple T-cannula at the terminal ileum and allotted within a $2{\times}2$ Latin square design. The pigs were fed either a maize or brown rice diet in a direct method to determine their digestibility. The brown rice used in this experiment was husked from one kind of early, long grain, and non-glutinous rice (ELGNR, indica rice: non-waxy rice, containing amylopectin and amylose) in southern China. Chromic oxide was used as a marker. The diets were supplied at about 4.0% of body weight in dry matter/d. Total faeces and urine were collected on days 4 and 5; digesta was collected on days 6-8 in each period. The average body weight was 24.3 kg at the start of the experiment and 27.6 kg at the end. The results showed that the apparent ileal digestibilities of most amino acids of brown rice were significantly higher than those in maize (p<0.01), as were the apparent ileal digestibilities of crude protein (CP), digestible energy (DE), organic matter (OM) and dry matter (DM) (p<0.05). However, the apparent ileal starch digestibilities of the two treatments were similar (p>0.05). The values of the apparent faecal digestibilities derived from the two methods, marker and total faecal-collection methods, were very similar and also correlated with each other. The difference in absolute value of the apparent faecal digestibilities between brown rice and maize was smaller compared to that of the apparent ileal digestibilities. The net protein utilization was higher (p = 0.07) and the DE metabolizable rate was significantly higher (p<0.01) for brown rice than for maize. The metabolizable energy (ME) of brown rice is similar to that of maize, while the DE of brown rice was relatively lower. It can be concluded that Chinese brown rice are better than maize not only in apparent ileal digestibilities, but also in metabolizable rate of amino acids and gross energy under the present study conditions.
Keywords
Brown Rice; Maize; Nutrient Digestibility; Growing Pigs;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 3
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bird, A. R., T. Hayakawa, Y. Marsono, J. M. Gooden, I. R. Record, R. L. Correll and D. L. Topping. 2000. Coarse brown rice increases facal and large bowel short-chain fatty acids and starch but lowers calcium in the large bowel of pigs. J. Nutr. 130:1780-1787
2 Kimura, F. T. and V. L.Miller. 1957. Improved determination of chromic oxide in cow feed and feces. J. Agric. Food Chem. 5:216   DOI
3 Li, S. and W. C. Sauer. 1994. The effect of dietary fat content on amino acid digestibility in young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1737-1743
4 Sauer, W. C. and L. Ozimek. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: Result and their practical application: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 15:367-387   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Zhang, D. F., D. F. Li, X. S. Piao, In. K. Han, C. J. Yang, I. S. Shin, J. G. Dai and J. B. Li. 2002. Effects of replacing maize with brown rice or brown rice with enzyme on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1334-1340   DOI
6 Fan, M. Z., W. C. Sauer, R. T. Hardin and K. A. Lien. 1994. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs: effect of dietary amino acid level. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2851-2859
7 Lin, F. D., D. A. Knabe and T. D. Tanksley. 1987. Apparent digestibility of amino acids, gross energy and starch in maize, sorghum, wheat, barley, oat groats and wheat middlings for growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 64:1655-1663   DOI
8 Zhang, S. R., K. X. Tian, J. C. Wang and Y. R. Zhao. 1999b. Evaluation on digestibility and metabolism characters on fodder brown rice and maize in the pig. Feed Industry of China. 20:31-32
9 Farrell, D. J. 1994. Utilization of rice bran in diet for domestic fowl and ducklings. World's Poult. Sci. J. 50:115-131   DOI   ScienceOn
10 He, R. G., Y. L. Ma, Y. Q. Wang, J. Y. Zhao and H. X. Wang. 1994. Study of the brown rice nutritional value by the pig's digestion and metabolism trial. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 13:268-273
11 Wang, J. F. 2000. Effects of dietary fiber and starch on gastrointestinal microflora, energy metabolism and in vitro fermentation in pigs. Ph. D. Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing
12 Green, S., S. L. Bertrand, M. J. C. Duron and R. A. Maillard. 1987. Digestibilities of aminoacid in maize, wheat and barley meal, measured in pigs with ileo-rectal anastomosis and isolation of the large intestine. J. Sci. Food Agric. 41:29-43   DOI
13 SPSS Inc. 1998. SPSS 9.0 for windows update. Chicago, Illinois
14 Zhang, S. R., K. X. Tian, J. C. Wang, M. H. Huang, W. J. Shen. and H. Jin. 1999a. Comparison on the feeding value between brown rice diet and maize diet in growing pig. Feed Industry of China. 20:26-27
15 Piao, X. S., D. F. Li, In. K. Han, Y. Chen, J. H. Lee, D. Y. Wang, J. B. Li and D. F. Zhang. 2002. Evaluation of Chinese brown rice as an alternative energy source in pig diets. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:89-93   DOI
16 National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th Ed. National Academy Press. Washington, DC
17 He, J. H., M. H. Huang, H. Jin, S. Y. Ceng and Q. G. Xu. 2000. Nutritional character of fodder paddy and brown rice: the 8th Symposium on Chinese Animal Nutrition of Chinese Animal Nutrition Association. The people's Publishing Company of Heilongjiang. pp. 189-193
18 Sukhija, P. S. and D. L. Palmquist. 1988. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and faeces. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:1202-1206   DOI
19 Li, J. B., D. F. Li, Y. L. Yin, X. S. Piao, J. H. He, G. P. Chen and J. C. Shu. 2004. Performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal disaccharidase activity of weaner/grower pigs given diets containing extruded Chinese stored brown rice with exogenous enzyme supplements. Anim. Sci. 79:429-438   DOI
20 AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA
21 Li, D. F., D. F. Zhang, X. S. Piao, In K. Han, C. J. Yang, J. B. Li and J. H. Lee. 2002. Effects of replacing maize with Chinese brown rice on growth performance and apparent faecal digestibility of nutrients in weanling pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1191-1197   DOI
22 American Association of Cereal Chemists. 2000. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 10th Ed. AACC Inc. Washington, DC