Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1799

Effects of Marbling on Meat Quality Characteristics and Intramuscular Connective Tissue of Beef Longissimus Muscle  

Li, Chunbao (Key Lab of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education)
Zhou, Guanghong (Key Lab of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education)
Xu, Xinglian (Key Lab of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education)
Zhang, Jingbo (Key Lab of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education)
Xu, Shuqin (Key Lab of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education)
Ji, Yanfeng (Key Lab of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.19, no.12, 2006 , pp. 1799-1808 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was designed to explore the effects of marbling on meat quality characteristics and intramuscular connective tissue of beef longissimus muscle. Chemical determinations, histological and mechanical measurements were performed on the raw and cooked meat at d 4 postmortem. The results showed that crude fat, collagen, fiber diameter and maximum transition temperature of intramuscular connective tissue increased (p<0.05) with the increase of marbling score. The cooking losses, collagen solubility, WBSF and perimysial thickness decreased (p<0.05) with the increasing marbling. WBSF correlated (p<0.05) with moisture, crude fat, collagen, cooking losses, sarcomere length and perimysial thickness. The development of marbling results in the decline in cooking losses, the avoidance of sarcomere shortening, and the disorganization of the perimysia, which accounts for the improvement of beef tenderness.
Keywords
Marbling; Tenderness; Connective Tissue; Longissimus;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 2  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 2
연도 인용수 순위
1 Brooks, J. C., J. B. Belew, D. B. Griffin, B. L. Gwartney, D. S. Hale, W. R Henning, D. D. Johnson, J. B. Morgan, F. C. Parrish, J. O Reagan and J. W. Savell. 2000. National beef tenderness survey-1998. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1852-1860
2 Cooper, C. C., B. B. Breidenstein, R. G. Cassens, G. Evans and R. W. Bray. 1968. Influence of marbling and maturity muscle. II. Histological considerations. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1542-1546   DOI
3 Fiems, L. O., E. De Campeneere, S. De Smet, G. Van de Voorde, J. M. Vanacker and C. V. Boucque. 2000. Relationship between fat depots in carcasses of beef bulls and effect on meat color and tenderness. Meat Sci. 56:41-47   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Obuz, E., M. E. Dikeman, J. P Grobbel, J. W. Stephens and T. M. Loughin. 2004. Beef longissimus lumborum, biceps femoris, and deep pectoralis Warner-Bratzler shear force is affected differently by endpoint temperature, cooking method, and USDA quality grade. Meat Sci. 68:243-248   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Ozawa, S., T. Mitsuhashi, M. Mitsumoto, S. Matsumoto, N. Itoh, K. Itagaki, Y. Kohno and T. Dohgo. 2000. The characteristics of muscle fiber types of longissimus thoracis muscle and their influences on the quantity and quality of meat from Japanese Black steers. Meat Sci. 54:65-70   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Parrish, F. C., D. G. Olson, B. E. Miner and R. E. Rust. 1973. Effect of degree of marbling and internal temperature of doneness on beef rib steaks. J. Anim. Sci. 37:430-434   DOI
7 Renand, G., B. Picard, C. Touraille, P. Berge and J. Lepetit. 2001. Relationship between muscle characteristics and meat quality traits of young Charolais bulls. Meat Sci. 59:49-60   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Riley, D. G., D. D. Johnson, C. C. Chase, R. L. West, S. W. Coleman, T. A. Olson and A. C. Hammond. 2005. Factors influencing tenderness in steaks from Brahman cattle. Meat Sci. 70:347-356   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Savell, J. W., R. E. Branson, H. R. Cross, D. M. Stiffler, J. W. Wise, D. B. Griffin and G. C. Smith. 1987. National consumer retail beef study: palatability evaluations of beef loin steaks that differed in marbling. J. Food Sci. 52:517-519   DOI
10 Shackelford, S. D., T. L. Wheeler and M. Koohmaraie. 1997. Repeatability of tenderness measurements in beef round muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2411-2416
11 Swanson, L. A., E. A. Kline and D. E. Goll. 1965. Variability of muscle fiber size in bovine longissimus dorsi. J. Anim. Sci. 24:97-101   DOI
12 Von Seggern, D. D., C. R. Calkins, D. D. Johnson, J. E. Brickler, and B. L. Gwartney. 2005. Muscle profiling: characterizing the muscles of the beef chuck and round. Meat Sci. 71:39-51   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Flint, F. O. and K. Pickering. 1984. Demonstration of collagen in meat products by an improved picro-sirius red polarization method. Analyst. 109:1505-1508   DOI
14 McBee, J. L. and J. A. Wiles. 1967. Influence of marbling and carcass grade on the physical and chemical characteristics of beef. J. Anim. Sci. 26:701-704   DOI
15 Nishimura, T., A. Hattori and K. Takahashi. 1999. Structural changes in intramuscular connective tissue during the fattening of Japanese Black Cattle, effect of marbling on beef tenderization. J. Anim. Sci. 77:93-104
16 McKenna, D. R., C. L. Lorenzen, K. D. Pollok, W. W. Morgan, W. L. Mies, J. J. Harris, R. Murphy, M. McAdams, D. S. Hale and J. W. Savell. 2004. Interrelationships of breed type, USDA quality grade, cooking method, and degree of doneness on consumer evaluations of beef in Dallas and San Antonio, Texas, USA. Meat Sci. 66:399-406   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Savell, J. W., S. L. Mueller and B. E. Baird. 2005. The chilling of carcasses. Meat Sci. 70:449-459   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Hill, F. 1966. The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of various ages. J. Food Sci. 31:161-166   DOI
19 Bergman, I. and R. Loxley. 1963. Two improved and simplified methods for spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline. Analyt. Chem. 35:1961-1965   DOI
20 Romans, J. R., H. J. Tuma and W. L. Tucker. 1965. Influence of carcass maturity and marbling on the physical and chemical characteristics of beef. I. Palatability, fiber diameter and proximate analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 24:681-685   DOI
21 USDA. 1997. United States standards for grades of carcass beef. Agriculture Marketing Service, USDA, Washington, DC
22 Jones, B. K. and J. D. Tatum. 1994. Predictors of beef tenderness among carcasses produced under commercial conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1492-1501
23 Light, N. and A. E. Champion. 1984. Characterization of muscle epimysium perimysium and endomysium collagens. Biochem. J. 219:1017-1026   DOI
24 Savell, J. W., H. R. Cross and G. C. Smith. 1986. Percentage ether extractable fat and moisture content of beef longissimus muscle as related to USDA marbling score. J. Food Sci. 51:838-840   DOI
25 Reuter, B. J., D. M. Wulf and R. J. Maddock. 2002. Mapping intramuscular tenderness variation in four major muscles of the beef round. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2594-2599
26 Tatum, J. D., G. C. Smith and Z. L. Carpenter. 1982. Interrelationships between marbling, subcutaneous fat thickness and cooked beef palatability. J. Anim. Sci. 54:777- 784   DOI
27 Hedrick, H. B., G. F. Krause, M. R. Ellersieck, R. J. Epley, J. C. Riley and G. B. Thompson. 1981. Beef carcass composition as influenced by yield and quality grade. J. Anim. Sci. 53:102- 106   DOI
28 Janz, J. A. M., J. L. Aalhus, M. E. R. Dugan and M. A. Price. 2006. A mapping method for the description of Warner-Bratzler shear force gradients in beef longissimus thoracis et lumborum and semitendinosus. Meat Sci. 72:79-90   DOI   ScienceOn
29 China's Ministry of Agriculture (CMA). 2003. Beef quality grading (NY/T676-2003). China's Standard Publishing, Beijing, China
30 Kim, C. J. and E. S. Lee. 2003. Effects of quality grade on the chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) beef. Meat Sci. 63:397-405   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Fortin, A., W. M. Robertson and A. K. W. Tong. 2005. The eating quality of Canadian pork and its relationship with intramuscular fat. Meat Sci. 69:297-305   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Breidenstein, B. B., C. C. Cooper, R. G. Cassens, G. Evans and R. W. Bray. 1968. Influence of marbling and maturity on the palatability of beef muscle. I. Chemical and organoleptic considerations. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1532-1541   DOI
33 Luchak, G. L., R. K. Miller, K. E. Belk, D. S. Hale, S. A. Michaelsen, D. D. Johnson, R. L. West, F. W. Leak, H. R. Cross and J. W. Savell. 1998. Determination of sensory, chemical and cooking characteristics of retail beef cuts differing in intramuscular and external fat. Meat Sci. 50:55-72   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Bratcher, C. L., D. D. Johnson, R. C. Littell and B. L. Gwartney. 2005. The effects of quality grade, aging, and location within muscle on Warner-Bratzler shear force in beef muscles of locomotion. Meat Sci. 70:279-284   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Cross, H. R., R. L. West and T. R. Dutson. 1981. Comparison of methods for measuring sarcomere length in beef semitendinosus muscle. Meat Sci. 5:261-266   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Denoyelle, C. and E. Lebihan. 2004. Intramuscular variation in beef tenderness. Meat Sci. 66:241-247   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Jeremiah, L. E. 1996. The influence of subcutaneous fat thickness and marbling on beef. Palatability and consumer acceptability. Food Res. Int. 29:513-520   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Wheeler, T. L., L. V. Cundiff and R. M. Koch. 1994. Effects of marbling degree on beef palatability in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 72:3145-3515   DOI