1 |
Arthur, J. A. 1986. An evaluation of industry breeding programs for egg type chickens. Proc. of 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 10:325-335.
|
2 |
Hill, W. G. 1971. Theoretical aspects of crossbreeding. Annals de genetique et de selection Animale 3:23-24.
DOI
|
3 |
Krehbiel, E. V., H. O. Hetzer, A. E. Flower, G. E. Dickerson, W. R. Harvey and L. A. Swiger. 1971. Effectiveness of reciprocal recurrent selection for performance of crosses between Montana No. 1 and Yorkshire swine. I. Preweaning traits. J. Anim. Sci. 32:191-210.
|
4 |
Robertson, A. 1971. Optimum utilization of genetic material with special reference to cross-breeding in relation to other methods of genetic improvement (Introduction report). Proc. of the Xth International Congress on Animal Production, Paris-vesailles, pp. 57-68.
|
5 |
Sellier, P. 1982. Selecting populations for use in crossbreeding. Proc. of the 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Animal Production, 6:15-49.
|
6 |
Wie, M. and J. H. J. van der Werf. 1994. Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information. Anim. Prod. 59:401-413.
|
7 |
Hetzer, H. D., R. H. Miller and R. C. Kling. 1977. Effectiveness of RRS for improving preweaning performance in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 45:989-1009.
|
8 |
Wong, W. C., W. J. Boylan and W. E. Rempel. 1971. Purebred versus crossbred performance as a basis of selection in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 32:605-610.
|
9 |
Comstock, R. E. and H. F. Robinson. 1957. Finding relative to reciprocal recurrent selection. Proc. of International Genetics Symposium, Science Council of Japan, Tokyo pp. 461-464.
|
10 |
Pirchner, F. 1976. Genetic correlations between purebred and crossbred performance in poultry. Bulletin Technique, Department de Genetique Animale, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique No. 24: 63-67 (Anim. Breed Abstr. 45:420).
|
11 |
Bell, A. E. 1982. Selection for heterosis-results with laboratory and domestic animals. Proc. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 6:206-227.
|
12 |
Wie, M. and H. A. M. van der Steen. 1991. Comparison of pureline selection with reciprocal recurrent selection system in animal breeding (a review). Anim. Breed Abstr. 59:281-298.
|
13 |
Brown, W. P. and A. E. Bell. 1980. An experimental comparison of selection alternatives to plateaued response. Genetics 94:477-496.
|
14 |
Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15:469-485.
|
15 |
Cress, C. E. 1966. A comparison of recurrent selection systems. Genetics 54:1371-1379.
|
16 |
Pirchner, F. and R. Mergl. 1977. Overdominance as cause for heterosis in poultry. J. Anim. Breed Genet. 94:151-158.
|
17 |
Vinson, W. E., E. J. Eison. and O. W. Robinson. 1969. Predicted response to selection for crossbred performance in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 28:725-733.
|
18 |
Pirchner, F. and C. M. Von Krosigk. 1973. Genetic parameters of cros- and purebred poultry. Br. Poult. Sci. 14:193-202.
|
19 |
Singh, R. P. and J. Kumar. 1994. Biometrical Methods in Poultry Breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India.
|
20 |
Biswas, D. K. and J. V. Craig. 1969. Relationship between purebred and crossbred paternal half-sisters' performance in chickens. Poult. Sci. 48:524-526.
|
21 |
Singh, R. P. and L. Dempfle. 1989. Optimising multistage selection in a modified reciprocal recurrent selection programme considering cost and rate of genetic progress. Proc. of the 40th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin, Vol. 1 (summaries), p. 167.
|
22 |
Comstock, R. E. 1961. Reciprocal recurrent selection with reference to swine breeding. Twenty second annual report, Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa.
|
23 |
Bell, A. E. and C. H. Moore. 1972. Reciprocal recurrent selection for pupal weight in Tribolium in comparison with conventional methods. Egyptian J. Genet. Cytol. 1:92-119.
|