Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.837

Effect of Variety on Proportion of Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value of Different Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Relationship between Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value  

Islam, M.R. (Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute)
Saha, C.K. (BRAC)
Sarker, N.R. (Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute)
Jalil, M.A. (Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute)
Hasanuzzaman, M. (Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.16, no.6, 2003 , pp. 837-842 More about this Journal
Abstract
Five varieties of napiergrasses (Pennisetum purpureum) were fractionated botanically into leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem and head. Chemical composition of each of whole napiergrass and their botanical fractions were determined. Correlation, linear and multiple regressions between botanical fractions and nutritive value of varieties of napiergrass were also estimated. All botanical fractions differed due to the effect of variety. Napier Pusha contained the highest proportion of leaf blade and internode, but the lowest proportion of leaf sheath. Napier Hybrid contained the lowest proportion of leaf blade, but highest proportion of node. Consequently, napier Pusha contained the highest (p<0.01) crude protein (CP, 9.0%), but Napier Hybrid had the lowest CP (7.0%). Chemical composition of whole plant differed significantly (p<0.01; except NFE, p>0.05) due to the variety. Not only the whole plant, chemical composition of most botanical fractions of whole plant differed (p<0.05 to 0.01) due to the variety. The intrarelationships between leaf blade and leaf sheath was negative (r=-0.43). Leaf sheath was also negatively correlated to CP, but positively correlated to ash of whole Napier or their botanical fractions. Leaf blade, on the other hand, increases CP but decreases ash content of whole plant or their fractions. These results, therefore, suggest that napiergrass varieties differ widely in terms of botanical fractions and nutritive value, which may have important implications on intake and productivity of animals. Furthermore, napiergrass varieties should be selected for leaf blade only for a better response.
Keywords
Napier; Variety; Botanical Fractions; Leaf Blade; Selection;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 4  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 6
연도 인용수 순위
1 Aman, P. and E. Nordkvist. 1983. Chemical composition and in vitro degradability of botanical fractions of cereal straw. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 13:61-67
2 Laredo, M. A. and D. J. Minson. 1973. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time by sheep of leaf and stem fractions of five grasses. Austra. J. Agric. Res. 24: 875-888   DOI
3 Wales, W. J., P. T. Doyle, G. R. Pearce. 1990. The feeding value of cereal straws for sheep. I. Wheat straws. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 29, 1-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Islam, M. R., E. Owen, D. I. Givens and A. R. Moss. 1997a. Effects of variety, fertilizer nitrogen and sowing date on in vitro digestibility and botanical fractions of oat straw. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. p.74
5 Wahed, R. A., E. Owen, M. Naate and B. J. Hosking. 1990. Feeding straw to small ruminants: effect of amount offered on intake and selection of barley straw by goats and sheep. Anim. Prod. 47: 105-110.   DOI
6 Thiago, L. R. L. and R. C. Kellaway. 1982. Botanical composition and extent of lignification affecting digestibility of wheat and oat straw and paspalum hay. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 7:71-81.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kibria, S. S., M. R. Islam and M. M. Rahman. 1993. Feasibility study on the production of different fodder crops in Bangladesh. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 22: 25-33
8 Ramanzin, M., E. R. Orskov and A. K. Tuah. 1986. Rumen degradation of straw. 2. Botanical fractions of straw from two barley cultivars. Anim. Prod. 43: 271-278   DOI
9 Shand, W. J., E. R. Orskov and L. A. Morrice. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 5. Botanical fractions and degradability of different varieties of oat and wheat straws. Anim. Prod. 47:387-392.   DOI
10 Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biomedical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.
11 SAS. 1988. Statistical Analysis System, Version 6.08, SAS Institute, SAS Inc, Cary, USA.
12 Orskov, E. R. 1988. Consistency of differences in nutritive value of straw from different varieties in different seasons. In: Plant Breeding and the Nutritive Value of Crop Residues, J. D. Reed, B. S. Capper and P. J. H. Neate (Ed.). International Livestock Center for Africa, pp. 163-173. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
13 Poppi, D. P., D. J. Minson and J. H. Ternouth. 1981. Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. I. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time in the reticulo-rumen. Austra. J. Agric. Res. 32: 99-108   DOI
14 Herbert, F. and E. F. Thomson. 1992. Chemical composition, intake, apparent digestibility and nylon-bag disappearance of leaf and stem fractions from straw of four barley genotypes. Anim. Prod. 55: 407-412   DOI
15 Ramanzin, M., L. Bailoni and G. Beni. 1991. Varietal differences in rumen degradation of barley, wheat and hard wheat straws. Anim. Prod. 53:143-150   DOI
16 AOAC. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D. C.
17 Islam, M. R., E. Owen, D. I. Givens and A. R. Moss. 1997b. Effect of amount offered on total intake of oat straw and straw botanical fractions by sheep. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. p.75
18 Islam, M. R., E. Owen, D. I. Givens and A. R. Moss. 1996. Effects of variety, sowing date and fertilizer nitrogen on botanical fractions of oat straw. Anim. Sci. 62:687
19 Nakashima, Y. and E. R. Orskov. 1990. Rumen degradation of straw. 9. Effect of cellulase and ammonia treatment on different varieties of rice straws and their botanical fractions. Anim. Prod. 50: 309-317   DOI
20 Walli, T. K., E. R. Orskov and P. K. Bhargava. 1988. Rumen degradation of straw. 3. Botanical fractions of two rice straw varieties and effects of ammonia treatment. Anim. Prod. 46:347-352.   DOI