1 |
Genstat 5 committee. 2000. Genstat 5 Release 4.2 The Guide to Genstat. VSN International Ltd. Oxford. UK.
|
2 |
Lamberson, W. R. and V. A. Lamberth. 1986. Repeatability of response to superovulation in Brangus cows. Theriogenology, 26:643-648.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Lohuis, M. M., C. Smith and J. C. M Dekkers. 1993. MOET results from a dispersed hybrid nucleus programme in dairy cattle. Anim. Prod., 57:369-378.
|
4 |
Nicholas, F. W. and C. Smith. 1983.Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting. Anim. Prod.. 36:341-353.
|
5 |
Smith, C. 1984. Rates of genetic change in farm livestock. Research and Development in Agriculture. 1:79-85.
|
6 |
Terawaki, Y. and Y. Asada. 2001. Effects of different methods for determining the number of transferable embryos on genetic gain and inbreeding coefficient in a Japanese Holstein MOET breeding population. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14(5):597-602.
|
7 |
Veerkamp, R. F., E. P. C. Koenen and G. De Jong. 2001. Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in first- parity cows estimated by random regression models. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2327-2335.
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Woolliams, J. A., Z. W. Luo, B. Villanueva, D. Waddington, P. J. Broadbent, W. A. C. McCauley and J. J. Robinson. 1995. Analysis of factors affecting superovulatory responses in ruminants. J. Agric. Sci. 124:61-70.
DOI
|
9 |
Isogai, T. 1992. Effects of season, age at calving, time after calving and interval of treatment the embryo production in superovulated Holstein donors. J. Reproduction and Development. 38:j1-j6.
DOI
|
10 |
Land, R. B. and W. G. Hill. 1975. The possible use of superovulation and embryo transfer in cattle to increase response to selection. Anim. Prod. 21:1-12.
|
11 |
McCullagh, P. and J. A. Nelder. 1983. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall. New York. 1st. ed.
|
12 |
Villanueva, B., J. A. Woolliams and G. Smith. 1995. The effect of improved reproductive performance on genetic gain and inbreeding in MOET breeding schemes for beef cattle. Genetique Selection Evolution 27:347-363.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Ruane, J. and R. Thompson. 1991. Comparison of simulated and theoretical results in adult MOET nucleus schemes for dairy cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 28:1-20.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Villanueva, B. and G. Simm. 1994. The use and value of embryo manipulation techniques in animal breeding. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Prod. Guelph. Vol.20: 200-207.
|
15 |
Tonhati, H., R. B. Lobo and H. N. Oliveira. 1999. Repeatability and heritability of response to superovulation in Holstein cows. Theriogenology 51:1151-1156.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Keller, D. S. and G. Teepker. 1990. Effect of variability in response to superovulation on donor cow selection differentials in nucleus breeding schemes. J. Dairy Sci. 73:549-554.
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Hasler, J. F., A. D. McCauley, E. C. Schermerhorn and R. H. Foote. 1983. Superovulatory responses of Holstein cows. Theriogenology. 19:83-99.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Asada, Y. and Y. Terawaki. 2000. Adaptation of distribution on number of transferable embryos per treatment. Anim. Sci. and Agric. Hokkaido. 42:418-426.
|
19 |
Dematawewa, C. M. B. and P. J. Berger. 1998. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield, fertility, and survival in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2700-2709.
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Donaldson, L. E. 1984. Effect of age of donor cows on embryo donor production. Theriogenology. 21:963-967.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Bastidas, P. R. and R. D. Randel. 1987. Effects on repeated superovulation and flushing on reproductive performance of Bos indicus cows. Theriogenology, 28:827-835.
DOI
ScienceOn
|