Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.297

Effects of Eggshell Pigmentation and Egg Size on the Spectral Properties and Characteristics of Eggshell of Meat and Layer Breeder Eggs  

Shafey, T.M. (Department of Animal Production, University of King Saud, College of Agriculture)
Al-mohsen, T.H. (Department of Animal Production, University of King Saud, College of Agriculture)
Al-sobayel, A.A. (Department of Animal Production, University of King Saud, College of Agriculture)
Al-hassan, M.J. (Department of Animal Production, University of King Saud, College of Agriculture)
Ghnnam, M.M. (Department of Physics, University of King Saud, College of Science)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.15, no.2, 2002 , pp. 297-302 More about this Journal
Abstract
The effects of eggshell pigmentation and egg size (medium and large) on the spectral properties and characteristics of eggshells were examined in eggs from two genetic groups of breeder flocks. Birds from meat (Hybro, pigmented eggshell, PES) and layer (Leghorn, non-pigmented eggshell, NPES) at 40 and 46 weeks of age, respectively, were used. Measurements of per cent shell (PS), shell thickness (ST), shell volume (SV), shell density (SD), egg shell conductance (EC) and physical dimensions of eggs were made. The spectral properties of eggshells were measured over the wavelength (WL) range of 200 to 1,100 nm. Eggshell absorbed approximately 99.8 percent of the light and transmitted only about 0.12 percent with a maximum light transmission at the near-infra-red region of about 1075 nm. It attenuated shorter WL and transmitted longer WL. Eggshell pigmentation and egg size influenced light transmission into the egg. The NPES had higher EC and transmission of light and lower PS and SD than those of the PES. Large size eggs had higher EC, SD, SV, transmission of light and egg physical dimensions than those of medium size eggs. It is concluded that genetic make up of birds and egg size influenced eggshell characteristics including EC and that, as a consequence, the difference in the spectral properties of eggshells. The pigmentation of eggshell influenced the amount and WL transmitted into the egg. The size and EC of eggs influenced the amount of light transmitted through the eggshell. EC is a good indicator for the ability of eggshell to transmit light.
Keywords
Egg Size; Shell Characteristics; Shell Pigmentation; Spectral Characteristics; Breeder Flocks;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 6
연도 인용수 순위
1 Butcher, G. D. and R. D. Miles 1995. Factors causing poor pigmentation of brown-shelled eggs. VM-94, a series of the College of Veterinary Medicine, Florida Cooperative Extension Services, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
2 Christensen, V. L. and K. E. Nestor. 1994. Changes in functional qualities of turkey eggshells in strains selected for increased egg production or growth. Poult. Sci. 73:1458-1464.   DOI   PUBMED
3 Christensen, V. L., G. B. Havenstein and G. S. Davis. 1995. Egg characteristics, carbohydrate metabolism, and thyroid hormones in late chick embryos from different genetic lines. Poult. Sci. 74:551-562.   DOI   PUBMED
4 Coleman, M. A. 1979. The effect of colored lights and egg size on the hatch time and weights and embryonic mortality and abnormalities of broilers. Poult. Sci. 58:1045(Abstr.).
5 Marshall, W. and D. B. Cruickshank. 1938. The function of the cuticle in relation to the porosity of eggs. J. Agric. Sci. 28:24-42.   DOI
6 SAS Institute. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
7 Shutze, J. V., J. K. Lauber, M. Kato and W. Wilson. 1962. Influence of incandescent and colored light on chicken embryos during incubation. Nature (lond.) 96:594-595.
8 Siegel, P. B., S. T. Isakson, F. N. Coleman and B. J. Hoffman. 1969. Photoacceleration of development in chick embryos. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 28:753-758.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Tamimie, H. S. 1967. Effect of continuous and intermittent light exposure on the embryonic development of chicken eggs. Poult. Sci. 46:1327(Abstr.).
10 Webb, R. B. and Malina, M. M. 1967. Mutagensis in Escherichia Coli by visible light. Science 156:1104-1105.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Tamimie, H. S. and M. W. Fox 1967. Effect of continuous and intermittent light exposure on the embryonic development of chicken eggs. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 20:793-799.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Shafey, T. M. 2001. Effects of egg size and eggshell conductance on hatchability traits of meat and layer breeder flocks. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15(1):1-6.
13 Ar, A., C. V. Paganelli, R. B. Reeves, D. G. Greene and H. Rahn. 1974. The avian egg: water vapor conductance, shell thickness, and functional pore area. Condor 76:153-158.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lauber, J. K. and J. V. Shutze 1964. Accelerated growth of embryo chicks under the influence of light. Growth 28:179-190.   PUBMED
15 Gimeno, M. A., C. M. Roberts and J. L. Webb 1967. Acceleration of early chick embryo heart by visible light. Nature (Lond.) 214:1014-1016.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Tullett, S. G. 1984. Minireview. The porosity of avian eggshells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78A:5-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Walter, J. H. and R. A. Voitle 1972. Effects of photo-period during incubation on embryonic and post-embryonic development of broilers. Poult. Sci. 51:1122-1126.   DOI   PUBMED
18 Garwood, V. A., E. J. Thornton and P. C. Lowe 1973. The effect of continuous illumination of incubating chicken eggs on embryonic development. Poult. Sci. 52:337-340.   DOI   PUBMED
19 Christensen, V. L. and F. M. McCorkle. 1982. Turkey egg weight losses and embryonic mortality during incubation. Poult. Sci. 61:1209-1213.   DOI
20 Peebles, E. D. and J. D. Brake. 1987. Eggshell quality and hatchability in broiler breeder eggs. Poult. Sci. 66:596-604.   DOI
21 Kubitschek, H. E. 1967. Mutagenesis by near-visible light. Science. 155:1545-1546.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Lowe, P. C. and V. A. Garwood 1977. Chick embryo development rate in response to light stimulus. Poult. Sci. 56:218-222.   DOI
23 Christensen, V. L. 1983. Distribution of pores on hatching and nonhatching turkey eggs. Poult. Sci. 62:1312-1316.   DOI
24 Paganelli, C. V., A. Olszowka and A. Ar. 1974. The avian egg: surface area, volume, and density. Condor, 76:319-325.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Tullett, S. G. and R. G. Board. 1977. Determinants of avian eggshell porosity. J. Zool. , London, 183:203-211.   DOI
26 Zakaria, A. H. 1989. Effect of fluorescent light on hatchability of commercial broiler parent stock eggs and on body weight of chickens hatched under large-scale commercial conditions. Poult. Sci. 68:1585-1587.   DOI   PUBMED