Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.166

Estimation of Crossbreeding Parameters for Serum Lysozyme Level in Broiler  

Nath, M. (Central Avian Research Institute)
Singh, B.P. (Central Avian Research Institute)
Saxena, V.K. (Central Avian Research Institute)
Dev Roy, A.K. (Central Avian Research Institute)
Singh, R.V. (Central Avian Research Institute)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.15, no.2, 2002 , pp. 166-171 More about this Journal
Abstract
The main objective of the present study is to estimate the crossbreeding parameters in respect to serum lysozyme level in broilers. The experiment involved a complete $4{\times}4$ diallel design using four synthetic broiler lines namely Coloured Synthetic Male Line (CSML), White Synthetic Male Line (WSML), Coloured Synthetic Female Line (CSFL) and Naked Neck Line (NNL). The lyophilised Micrococcus lysodeikticus suspension was used to detect the lysozyme level in the serum of birds. The data were analysed by least-squares method to find the effects of genetic and non-genetic factors using appropriate model. The crossbreeding parameters for this trait were estimated by complete diallel model assuming the effect of each synthetic line as fixed. The results indicated that additive and non-additive genetic variation attributed to minor genes at many loci is important for the genetic control of serum lysozyme level in chickens. Total non-additive components of variance also showed significant amount of heterosis in crossbred progenies, and therefore exploitation of non-additive component of variance is possible for improvement in serum lysozyme level in broilers. The overall results suggested that for commercial broiler production system, the selection for specialised line on the basis of serum lysozyme level and subsequent crossing of parent lines could enhance the immunocompetence status in relation to serum lysozyme level in crossbred chickens.
Keywords
Crossbreeding; Diallel; Lysozyme; Broiler;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 2
연도 인용수 순위
1 Gardner, C. O. and S. H. Eberhart. 1966. Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22:439-452.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Sato, Y. and K. Watanabe. 1976. Lysozyme in hen blood serum. Poult. Sci. 55:1749-1756.   DOI   PUBMED
3 Saxena, V. K. 1993. Genetic studies on immunocompetence in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute (Deemed University), Izatnagar, UP., India.
4 Bessarabov, B. F. and A. A. Krykanov. 1985. The use of tests of natural resistance in poultry breeding. Sbornik Nauchnykh Trudov. Moskovskoi Veterinarnoi Akademii. 31:139-142.
5 Roitt, I. M., J. Brostoff and D. K. Male. 1993. Introduction to the immune system, In Immunology, Third Edition, Mosby, London, UK. pp. 1.1-1.2.
6 Lie, O. 1980. Genetic variation in serum lysozyme activity in cattle. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavia. 21:448-450.
7 Harvey, W. R. 1990. Users' Guide, LSMLHW and MIXMDL PCL version. Mixed model least squares and maximum likelihood computer programme. Ohio, USA.
8 Eisen, E. J., S. G. Horstgen, A. M. Saxton and T. R. Bandy. 1983. Genetic interpretation and analysis of diallel crosses with animals. Theor. Appl. Genet. 65:17-23.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Greenfield, J. and C. H. Bigland. 1971. Detection of lysozyme in developing avian embryo. Poult. Sci. 50:1748-1753.   DOI   PUBMED
10 Gregory, K. E., L. V. Cundiff, R. M. Koch, D. B. Laster and G. M. Smith. 1978. Heterosis and breed maternal and transmitted effects in beef cattle. I. Preweaning traits. J. Anim. Sci. 47:1031-1041.   DOI
11 Gavora, J. S. 1998. Progress and prospects in resistance to disease. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress Applied to Livestock Production. Armidale, NSW, Australia, 1998. Vol. 24:253-258.
12 Casas, D. E. and E. T. Wellhausen. 1968. Diveridad genetica y heterosis. Fitotec. Latinoam. 5:53-61.
13 Gavora, J. S. 1990. Disease genetics. In: Poultry Breeding and Genetics (Ed. R. D. Crawford). Elsevier Publication, New York. pp. 805-846.
14 Bacon, L. D. 1987. Influence of major histocompatibility complex on disease resistance and productivity. Poult. Sci. 66:802-811.   DOI   PUBMED
15 Sheldon, B. L. 2000. Strategies for improving the production of scavenging chickens: Genetics and Breeding. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 13(Supp. C):83-85.
16 Warner, C. M., D. L. Meeker and M. F. Rothschild. 1987. Genetic control of immune responsiveness: A review of its use as a tool for selection for disease resistance. J. Anim. Sci. 64:394-406.   DOI   PUBMED
17 Sohn, K. S., M. K. Kim, J. D. Kim and In K. Han. 2000. The role of immunostimulants in monogastric animal and fish. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 13(8):1178-1187.   DOI
18 Coterrill, D. J. and A. R. Winter. 1954. Egg white lysozyme. 1. Relative lysozyme activity in fresh eggs having low and higher interior quality. Poult. Sci. 33:607-611.
19 Pal, S. K. 1992. Genetic characterization of indigenous guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, (Deemed University) Izatnagar, India.