1 |
Castell, A. G. 1990. Field peas. In: Nontraditional Feed Sources for Use in Swine Production (Ed. P. A. Thacker and R. N. Kirkwood). Butterworths, Stoneham, Massachusetts, pp. 185-196.
|
2 |
Castell, A. G. and L. Falk. 1980. Effects of dietary canola seed on pig performance and backfat composition. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 60:795-797.
DOI
|
3 |
Davies, R. L. 1984a. Field peas as a feed for growing and finishing pigs. I. Nutrient levels in commercial crops. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 24:350-353.
DOI
|
4 |
Fenton, T. W. and M. Fenton. 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and faeces. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 59:631-634.
DOI
|
5 |
Thacker, P. A. 1998. Effect of micronization of full-fat canola seed on performance and carcass characteristics of growingfinishing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 71:89-97.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. No. 2. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. NAS-NRC, Washington, DC.
|
7 |
O'Doherty, J. V. and U. Keady. 2000. The nutritive value of extruded and raw peas for growing an finishing pigs. Anim. Sci. 70:265-274.
DOI
|
8 |
Orue, E., J. Butron, F. Ibanez, R. Alonso and F. Marzo. 1998. The effect of germination and extrusion on the nutritional quality of peas (Pisum sativum L. cv. Ballet). In: Recent Advances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds and Rapeseed (Ed. A. J. M. Jansman, G. D. Hill, J. Huisman and A. F. B. van der Poel). Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 417-420.
|
9 |
Saskatchewan Pork Producers Marketing Board. 1997. Export Hog Settlement Grid. Saskatoon, Sask. p. 2.
|
10 |
Bell, J. M. 1993. Factors affecting the nutritional value of canola meal: A review. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 73:679-697.
|
11 |
Swick, R. A. 1994. Soybean meal quality. American Soybean Association Technical Bulletin PO11-1994.
|
12 |
SAS. 1990. SAS Users Guide, Version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
|
13 |
Salo, M. L. 1980. Nutritive value of full fat rapeseeds for growing pigs. J. Sci. Agric. Soc. Finland 52:1-6.
|
14 |
Savage, G. P. and S. Deo. 1989. The nutritional value of peas: A literature review. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Series A:65-87.
|
15 |
Bengala Freiere, J., A. Aumaitre, J. Peiniau and Y. Lebreton. 1991. Apparent ileal digestibility of starch and -galactosides from peas by early weaned pigs: Effect of extrusion. In:Digestive Physiology in Pigs (Ed. M. W. A. Verstegen, J. Huisman and L. A. den Hartog). Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 395-399.
|
16 |
Froseth, J. A. and D. M. Peters. 1981. Feeding rapeseed meal and raw or extruded whole rapeseed to growing-finishing pigs. Washington State University, Pullman Swine Day Producer Report No. 11.
|
17 |
Davies, R. L. 1984b. Field peas as a feed for growing and finishing pigs. 2. Effects of substituting peas for meat meal or fish meal in conventional diets. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 24:507-511.
DOI
|
18 |
Grosjean, F. and F. Gatel. 1986. Peas for pigs. Pigs News Inform. 7:443-448.
|
19 |
Bell, J. M. and A. G. Wilson. 1970. An evaluation of field peas as a protein and energy source for swine rations. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 50:15-23.
DOI
|
20 |
O'Doherty, J. V. and U. Keady. 2001. The effect of expander processing and extusion on the nutritive value of peas for pigs. Anim. Sci. 72:43-53.
DOI
|
21 |
Campbell, L. D. and F. Schone. 1998. Effects of antinutritional factors in rapeseed. In: Recent Advances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds and Rapeseed (Ed. A. J. M. Jansman, G. D. Hill, J. Huisman and A. F. B. van der Poel). Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 185-198.
|
22 |
Aherne, F. X. and J. M. Bell. 1990. Canola seed: Full-fat. In: Non-Traditional Feed Sources for Use in Swine Production (Ed. P. A. Thacker and R. N. Kirkwood). Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham, Massachusetts, pp. 79-90. Association of Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official Methods of Analysis, 13th ed, AOAC, Washington, DC.
|
23 |
Castell, A. G., L. R. Neden and K. Mount. 1988. Potential of field pea (Pisium sativum) screenings as feed for market pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:577-579.
DOI
|