Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1

Effects of Egg Size and Eggshell Conductance on Hatchability Traits of Meat and Layer Breeder Flocks  

Shafey, Tarek M. (Department of Animal Production, University of King Saud, College of Agriculture)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.15, no.1, 2002 , pp. 1-6 More about this Journal
Abstract
Eggs obtained from 46 and 42 weeks old meat (Hybro) and layer (Leghorn) breeders flocks, respectively were used to examine the effects of genetic type of birds and egg size (small, medium and large) on variables of eggshell characteristics and hatchability traits. The variables measured were egg weight (EW), egg surface area (ESA) and eggshell characteristics (shell conductance (EC), per cent shell (PS), shell thickness (ST), shell volume (SV), shell density (SD) and hatchability traits (per cent hatchability (HP), early dead embryos (ED), late dead embryos (LD), pips with live embryos (PL) and pips with dead embryos (PD)). Genetic type of bird influenced all egg characteristics and HP of eggs. Eggs produced by the small Leghorn bird had lower EW, ESA, EC, ST, SV and HP than those produced by the heavy Hybro bird. The reduction of HP was associated with an increase in the percentage of ED and PL. Egg size influenced all variables measured except ST. Small size eggs had lower EW, ESA and EC and higher PS and SD than those of large eggs. Medium size eggs produced a higher HP when compared with that of large size eggs. The reduction of HP in large eggs was associated with higher percentage of ED, LD and PL. There were significant interactions between the genetic group of birds and egg size on LD and HP. Large egg size of Hybro birds had higher LD and lower HP than those of small size eggs produced by the same flock. However, There was no difference in HP and LD among the different egg sizes produced by Leghorn birds. It was concluded that genetic make up of birds and egg size influence eggshell characteristics and HP. The type of bird (heavy or small) influences the optimum egg size for successful hatching. Attention should be given to the size and eggshell characteristics of eggs of breeders' flocks for achieving maximum HP.
Keywords
Eggshell; Egg Size; Per Cent Hatchability; Breeder Flocks;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 6
연도 인용수 순위
1 Board, R. G. 1980. The avian eggshell-A resistance network. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 48:303-313.   DOI
2 Peebles, E. D. and J. D. Brake. 1987. Eggshell quality and hatchability in broiler breeder eggs. Poult. Sci. 66:596-604.   DOI
3 Peebles, E. D., J. D. Brake and R. P. Gildersleeve. 1987. Effects of cuticle removal and incubation humidity on embryonic development and hatchability of broilers. Poult. Sci. 66:834-840.   DOI
4 Rahn, H., V. L. Christensen and F. W. Eden. 1981. Changes in egg conductance, pores, and physical dimensions of egg and shell during the first breeding cycle of turkey hens. Poult. Sci. 60:2536-2541.   DOI
5 SAS Institute.1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC..
6 Tullett, S. G. 1990. Science and the art of incubation. Poult. Sci. 69:1-15.   DOI   PUBMED
7 Visschedijk, A. H. J. 1968. The air space and embryonic respiration. 1. The pattern of gaseous exchange in the fertile egg during the closing stages of incubation. Br. Poult. Sci. 9:173-184.   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
8 Wilson, H. R. 1991. Interrelationships of egg size, posthatching growth and hatchability. World's Poult. Sci. J. 47:5-20.   DOI
9 Marshall, W. and D. B. Cruickshank. 1938. The function of the cuticle in relation to the porosity of eggs. J. Agric. Sci. 28:24-42.   DOI
10 Meir, M., A. Ar and A. Nir. 1984. Preincubation dipping of turkey eggs. Does it affect eggshell conductance? Poult. Sci. 63:2475-2478.   DOI
11 Wangensteen, O. D., D. Wilson and H. Rahn. 1970/71. Diffusion of gases across the shell of the hen's egg. Res. Physiol. 11:16-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Christensen, V. L. 1983. Distribution of pores on hatching and nonhatching turkey eggs. Poult. Sci. 62:1312-1316.   DOI
13 Nestor, K. E., K. I. Brown and S. A. Touchburn. 1972. Egg quality and poult production in turkeys. 1. Variation during a seven month lay period. Poult. Sci. 51:341-349.   DOI
14 Tullett, S. G. 1978. Pore size versus pore number in avian eggshells. In: Respiratory Function in Birds, Adult and Embryonic (Ed. J. Riiper). Springer, Berlin, Germany. pp. 217-226.
15 Christensen, V. L. and K. E. Nestor. 1994. Changes in functional qualities of turkey eggshells in strains selected for increased egg production or growth. Poult. Sci. 73:1458-1464.   DOI
16 Tullett, S. G. and F. G. Burton. 1982. Factors affecting the weight and water status of the chick at hatch. Br. Poult. Sci. 23:361-369.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Tullett, S. G. and F. G. Burton. 1986. The recent reawakening of interest in bird physiology particularly eggs, eggshell porosity and embryonic respiration. Wiss. Z. Humboldt-Univ. Berl. Math.-Naturiss. Reihe 35:273-284.
18 Christensen, V. L. and F. M. McCorkle. 1982. Turkey egg weight losses and embryonic mortality during incubation. Poult. Sci. 61:1209-1213.   DOI
19 Christensen, V. L., G. B. Havenstein and G. S. Davis. 1995. Egg characteristics, carbohydrate metabolism and thyroid hormones in late chick embryos from different genetic lines. Poult. Sci. 74:551-562.   DOI
20 Moran, E. T. and B. S. Reinhart. 1979. Physical and chemical characteristics of Small White turkey eggs from older commercial breeder flocks with an examination of changes due to weight and time after lay. Poult. Sci. 58:341-349.   DOI
21 Taylor, L. W., A. Sjodin and C. A. Gunn. 1956. The gaseous environment of the chick embryo in relation to its development and hatchability. 1. Effect of carbon dioxide and oxygen levels during the period of the first four days of incubation upon hatchability. Poult. Sci. 35:1206-1215.   DOI
22 Rahn, H., A. Ar and C. V. Paganelli. 1979. How bird eggs breathe. Scientific Am. 240:46-55.
23 Ar, A., C. V. Paganelli, R. B. Reeves, D. G. Greene and H. Rahn. 1974. The avian egg: water vapor conductance, shell thickness, and functional pore area. Condor. 76:153-158.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Tullett, S. G. 1981. Theoretical and practical aspects of eggshell porosity. Turkeys. 29:24-28.
25 Tullett, S. G. and R. G. Board. 1977. Determinants of avian eggshell porosity. J. Zool., London 183:203-211.   DOI
26 Tullett, S. G. 1984. Minireview. The porosity of avian eggshells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78A:5-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Rahn, H., C. V. Paganelli, I. C. T. Nisbet and G. C. Whittow. 1976. Regulation of incubation water loss in eggs of seven species of terns. Physiol. Zool. 49:245-259.   DOI