Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1433

Leucaena Seeds as Protein Supplement in the Rations of Growing Sheep  

Singh, Sultan (Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute)
Kundu, S.S. (Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute)
Negi, A.S. (Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute)
Gupta, S.K. (Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute)
Singh, N.P. (Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute)
Pachouri, V.C. (Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute)
Publication Information
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences / v.15, no.10, 2002 , pp. 1433-1438 More about this Journal
Abstract
The study was carried out to evaluate leucaena seeds as a protein replacement of mustard seed cake (MSC) in the concentrate mixture of growing lambs. Fifteen owing male lambs (Local${\times}$Corridale) with an average body weight of 16.3 kg were allocated into three dietary treatments (T1, T2, and T3) with five animals in each group. Animals were offered dry mixed grass, berseem hay and concentrate mixture to meet their nutrient requirements. In concentrate mixture of T1, (Control) MSC was used as protein source, while in T2 and T3 groups, 25 and 50% of MSC was replaced by leucaena leucocephala seeds. On completion of three months (90 days) of feeding, a digestion cum-metabolism trial was conducted to determine DMI, nutrient utilization, and nitrogen balance. Changes in body weight were recorded at 15 day internals and eating patterns were recorded for 3 consecutive days at the end of the feeding trial. MSC had higher CP contents than leucaena seeds (27.0%). Mimosine contents in leucaena seeds were 1.1 compared to 0.2 and 0.4% in concentrate mixture of T2 and T3 group, respectively. Dry matter intake varied non-significantly ($79.3{\pm}1.2$ to $83.4{\pm}1.3g/kg$ $w^{0.75}$) across the dietary treatments. Digestibility of DM and cell wall polysaccharides (NDF, ADF. Cellulose and hemicellulose) were comparable, however CP digestibility was relatively lower in leucaena luecocephala seeds based groups (T2 $45.5{\pm}1.7$ and T3 $46.7{\pm}3.5$) compared to MSC supplemented group (T1 $47.7{\pm}0.9%$). The growth rate of lambs was non-significantly higher in T1 ($79.2{\pm}5.4$) compared to T2 ($73.8{\pm}8.8$) and T3 ($73.9{\pm}7.0$), respectively. The animals were in positive nitrogen balance and N-balance varied from 1.8 to 2.9 g/d across treatment groups. The eating rate (% of total offered) of concentrate up-to 15 min was relatively higher in T1 (82.4) than T2 (74.2) and T3 (77.8%). However no effect of leucaena seeds was recorded on total DMI of animals. The results of the study revealed that the inclusion of up to 50% leucaena seeds, as protein source in concentrate mixture of lambs had no adverse effect on DMI, nutrient utilization, eating patterns, nitrogen balance and growth performance of lambs.
Keywords
Leucaena Seeds; Growth; Eating Pattern; Nitrogen Balance;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dharamsare, K. S., A. S. Gampawar and M. V. Gorentiwar. 1991. Effect of supplementation of Subabul (Leucaena leucocephala) seed on growth rate in heifers. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 8:61-64.
2 Gupta, B. K., A. K. Ahuja and N. S. Malik. 1991. Effect of replacement of de-oiled GNC with processed Subabul (Leucaena leucocephala) seeds in ration of buffalo calves. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 8:131-134.
3 NAS. 1977. Leucaena : promising Forage and Tree Crop for the Tropics. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
4 Shukla, P. C. P. M., Talapada, H. B. Desai and M. I. Meisuriya. 1987. Chemical composition and nutritive value of Leucaena leucocephala seeds. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 3:207-208.
5 Tiwari, S. P. and G. L. Chawla. 1995. Utilization of Subabul (Leucaeana leucocephala) seed in the ration of Surti buffalo calves. In Current Status and Future Strategies in meeting the challenges in Animal Nutrition. VII Animal Nutrition Research Workers Conference, 7-9 December, at Bombay Veterinary College, Bombay, p. 65(Abstr).
6 Gupta, P. C., M. A. Akbar and V. Sagar. 1986. Subabul (Leucaena leucocephala) A new feed resource, Department of Animal Nutrition, H.A.U. Hisar. India.
7 Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran.1968. Statistical Methods. IBH Publishing Co., Kolkata
8 Radha, K., M. M. Naidu and K. J. Redy. 1995. Nutritive value of Sababul (Leucaena leucocephala) pods in goats. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 13:73-76.
9 Akbar, M. A. 1983. Studies on Subabul (Leucaena leucocephala) as a source of protein supplement for buffalo calves. M. V. Sc. Thesis, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India.
10 AOAC. 1992. Official Methods of Analysis.14th Ed. Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.
11 Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agriculture Hand Book no. 379, AR, USDA, Washington, DC.
12 Gupta, B. K., R. P. Gupa and N. S. Malik. 1988. Effect of replacement of green lucerne with Subabul (leucaena leucocephala) leaf meal in the diet on nutrient utilization and growth in buffalo calves. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 5:202-206.
13 Gupta, H. K. and P. P. Atreja. 1998. Effect of feric chloride treated leucaena leucocephala on metabolism of mimosine and 3-hydroxy (1H)-pyridone in growing rabbits. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. (In press)
14 ICAR. 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Livestock and Poultry. ICAR, Krishi Anushndhan Bhavan, Pusa, New Delhi.
15 Ram J. J., P. P. Atreja, A. Chhabra and R. C. Chopra. 1994. Mimosine degradation in calves fed sole diet of Leucaena leucocephala in India. Tropical Health Production 26:199-206.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Garcia, G. W., T. U. Ferguson, F. A. Neckles and K. A. E. Archibald. 1996. The nutritive value and forage productivity of Leucaena leucocephala . Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 60:29-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Gupta, P. C., V. K. Khatta and A. B. Mondal. 1992. Analytical Technique in Animal Nutrition. 2nd ed. Directorate of Publications, H.A.U., Hisar, India.
18 Ross, E. and J. A. Springhall. 1963. Evaluation of ferrous sulphate as a detoxifying agent for Mimosine in Leucaena leucocephala by mineral supplementation for feeding to ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 50:157-167.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Gampawar, A. S., V. M. Gorantiwar and S. S. Bhaiswar. 1988. Effect of feeding Sbabul (Leucaena leucocephala) seeds as a part of protein supplement on growth in Sahiwal${\times}$Jersey calves. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 5(3):240-243.
20 D' Mello, J. P. F. 1992. Chemical composition to the use of tropical legumes in animal nutrition. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 38:237-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Yadava, P. S. and I. S. Yadava. 1988. Cell wall constituents and mineral contents in subabul (Leucaena leucocephala). Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 5(3):230-236.
22 Gupta, P. C., A. S. Virk, V. K. Khatta, N. Kumar and V. Sagar. 1987. Nutrient digestibility, growth and meat quality of goats fed Subabul (Leucaena leucocephala) seed containing diets. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 4:238-242.