[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2012.8.2.075

The influence of public dispute on trade/investment disputes: Case of SsangYong Motors

Kim, Jong-Ho (Department of Public Administration Kyung Hee University)

Publication Information

International Journal of Contents / v.8, no.2, 2012 , pp. 75-81 More about this Journal

Abstract

This study explores the important causal relationship between the public (domestic) and trade (international) disputes of South Korea and China. To understand the relations between the domestic and international disputes, Putnam's study of the two-level game theory has been conducted in order to analyze the effect of complicated social and political frameworks on international trade disputes. Due to the social and political differences between South Korea and China, this study provides three findings based on negotiation, policy, and strategic approaches.

Keywords

Public dispute; International dispute; Conflict Management and Resolution;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	Spanier, John and Eric. M. Y. Uslaner. 1985. American Foreign Policy Making and the Democratic Dilemmas, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2	Walton, Richard E. and Robert B. Mckersie. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of Social Interaction System, New York: McGraw-Hill.
3	Kim, Tae Ki. 2005. Problems and improvement on conflict resolution policies: Focusing on public disputes. Prepared for presentation at Korean Political Science Association Conference.
4	Kim, Tae Ki. 2007. The empire of the wealth. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Kyung Moon Press.
5	Lake, David A. 1988. The State and American Trade Strategy in the Pre-hegemonic Era. International Organization, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 33-58 DOI ScienceOn
6	Lee, Dal Kon. 2005. Negotiation theory, Seoul, Republic of Korea: Bup Mun Press.
7	Mo, Jong Lin and Byung Il Choi. 2006. Trade negotiation in Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea: O Rum Press.
8	Lee, Soo Min, 2009. The Analysis of the Korea-Chile and the Korea-Singapore FTAs : Focusing on the Negotiation through Robert D. Putnam's Win-set. Prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2009.
9	Lehman, Howard P. and Jennifer L. McCoy. 1992. The Dynamics of the Two-Level Bargaining Game: the 1988 Brazilian Debt Negotiations. World Politics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 600-644. DOI
10	Mayer, Frederick W. 1992. Managing Domestic Differences in International Negotiations: the Strategic Use of Internal Side Payments. International Organization, vol. 46, no.4, pp. 793-818. DOI ScienceOn
11	Moravcsik, Andrew. 1993. "Introduction: Integrating International and Theories of International Bargaining." In Double- Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, edited by Evans, Peter B. Harold K. Jacobson and Robert D. Putnam, Berkley CA: University of California Press.
12	Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politic: the Logic of Two-Level Games, International Organization, vol. 42. no. 3, pp. 427-460. DOI ScienceOn
13	Rosenau, James N. 1966. "Pre-theories and Theories of Foreign Policy." In Approaches to Comparative and International Politics, edited by R. Barry Farrell, Evanston, Il.: Northwestern University Press.
14	Ikenberry, G. John. 1988. Reasons of State: Oil Politics and the Capacities of the American Government, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
15	Acharya, Amitav. 1997. Multilateralism: Is There an Asia-Pacific Way? NBR (National Bureau of Asian Research) Analysis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 5-18.
16	Evans, Peter B. 1979. Dependant Development: The Alliance of Multinational, state, and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
17	Fridman, H. Richard, 1993. Side-Payments versus Security Cards: Domestic Bargaining Tactics in International Economic Negotiations. International Organization, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 387-410. DOI ScienceOn
18	Keohane, Robert O. 1985. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
19	Ka, Sang Jun, Sun Chul Ahn, Lim Jae Hyung and Hak Lin Kim. 2007. Present state of Korean public dispute and characteristics: 1990-2007. Korean Journal of Political Science, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 56-57.
20	Kim, Dal Jung. 1998. Understanding of diplomatic policy theories. Seoul, Republic of Korea: O Rum Press.
21	Kim, Tae Hyun, Suk Jin Yoo and Jin Young Jung. 1998. Diplomacy and politics. Seoul, Republic of Korea: O Rum Press.