Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2011.7.1.052

New Paradigm of Systems Thinking and Action in an Interior Design Education Field  

Choi, Seung-Pok (Interior Design Dept. Silla University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Contents / v.7, no.1, 2011 , pp. 52-57 More about this Journal
Abstract
The organizational theory and design in future encourages us to bring a fluid perspective to the problems and challenges face. Organizational structure, strategy, management style, teamwork, organizational change, and even products and services can be vitalized and re-formed through creative images that allow us to act in new ways. Leaders and educators sat all levels must gain comfort in dealing with the insights and implications of diverse perspectives. In a leadership paradigm in action, leaders and educators who have more flexibility and willingness to create a learning organization are successful in improving productivity and student empowerment. The key element to organizational structure and changes for interior design education becomes communications. Finally, we need to recognize that despite its roots in mechanistic thinking, organization is a creative process of imagination. We organize as we imagine, and it is always possible to imagine in new ways.
Keywords
interior design education; systems thinking; organizational design;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Nonaka, L., & Nishiguchi T. (Eds) Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001
2 Operations. (n.d). In Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/operations.html.
3 Schein, E. Careers, culture and organizational learning. Thinkers, Retrieved from EBSCO database, 2000.
4 Senge, P. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organizational. New York: Doubleday, 1990.
5 Senge, P. M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday, 1994.
6 Seungpok, C. Leadership in Design Management by Prentice Hall's Self-Assessment. The Korea Contents Association, 6(2), 2010.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Whitworth, L. Co-Active Coaching (2nd ed.). Mountain View, California: Davies-Black, 2007.
8 Wren, J. The leader’s companion: Insights on leadership through the ages. New York: The Free Press, 1995.
9 Dyer, G., & McDonough, B. The state of km. KM magazine, 2001, pp. 21-36.
10 Ethical Solutions, Inc. Transforming challenges into opportunities [moto]. Lake Oswego, OR: Ethical Solutions, Inc, 2004.
11 Gallup Organization. About Strengths Based Leadership. Retrieved from http://strengths.gallup.com/110242/About-Book.aspx.
12 Gardner, H. Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Graham, and Gandi. New York: Basic Books, 1993.
13 Heylighen, F. Epistemology, introduction. Retrieved from http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/EPISTEMI.html.
14 Invancevich, J., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. Organizational behavior and management (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2005.
15 John, F. Interior Design. (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall, 2093
16 Kouzes, J. & Posner, B. The student leadership challenge (4th ed). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass, 2008.
17 Kouzes, J., &Posner, B. The leadership challenge (4th ed). San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass, 2007.
18 Moser, P., & vander Nat, A. Human knowledge: classical and contemporary approaches (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, 2003
19 Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (3rd ed.). Chicago. The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
20 Lee, H. & Byounggu, C. KM enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of management information systems. Summer 2003, Vol. 20, Issue 1, 2003, pp. 170-228.
21 Motivation. (n.d.). In Reference for Business. Retrieved fromhttp://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Mar-No/Motivation-and-Motivation-Theory.html.
22 Afsaneh Navahandi, The Art and Science of Leadership, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall. Pearson Education, Inc, 2006
23 Alberts, D.J., A model of multidiscipline teams in knowledge-creating organizations. Team Performance Management, 13(5/6), 2007, pp. 172-183.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Argyris, C. Actionable knowledge: Design causality in the service of consequential theory. The journal of applied behavioral science. Arlington: Vol. 32, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Changing Minds. Transformational Leadership. Retrieved from http://changingminds.org/disciplines/leadership/styles/transformational_leadership.htm.
26 Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. Management: Leading & collaborating in a competitive world (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin: New York, 2007.
27 Becerra-Fernandez, I., Gonzalez, A., & Sabherwal, R. KM: Challenges, solutions, and technologies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004.
28 Christine M. Professional practice for interior design. (3rd ed.). John Wiley &Sons, Inc, 2002.
29 Clawson, J. G. Level three leadership: Getting below the surface. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006.
30 Drucker, P. F. Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41(2). 1999.