Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2010.6.2.021

Leadership in Design Management by Prentice Hall's Self-Assessment  

Choi, Seung-Pok (Interior Design Dept. Silla University)
Publication Information
International Journal of Contents / v.6, no.2, 2010 , pp. 21-27 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts four different kinds of leadership models in Design Management. Similarities and differences between these four models in contemporary leadership issues and challenges are analyzed and described. Each model will demonstrate the effects of leadership and how these leaders use the different approaches to develop their leadership style in their design field. This paper proposes that contemporary leadership in Design Management involves a unique bonding among leaders and followers, and more flexible and developed leadership will continue in the understanding and skill with which applying to the dynamic of organization change. The results and application of each model's assessment indicate a team of leaders that are capable of achieving excellence through their combined talents and vision to achieve in design fields using their potential inability of their own leadership.
Keywords
Leadership; Self-Assessment; Design Management;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J. T. Wren, The leader's companion: Insights on leadership through the ages. New York: The Free Press, 1995.
2 G. Yukl, Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2010.
3 The Design Management Institute. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from http://www.dmi.org/dmi/html/aboutdmi/design_managemen.htm, 2009.
4 L. Thomas, How to become a more design-minded organization. DMI Review Article, vol. 20, no.3, Retrieved January 8, 2010, from http://www.dmi.org/dmi/html/publications/journal/fullabstract_d.jsp?itemID=09203LOC28, 2009.
5 W. Antonia, Managing Editor. Managing design in SMEs. DMI Review Article, vol. 20, no.3, 2009.
6 K. Strang, Examining effective and ineffective transformational project leadership. Team Performance Management, vol.11, no.3/4, 2005, pp.68.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 J. G. Clawson, Level three leadership: Getting below the surface. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006.
8 B. M. Bass, Does the transactional-transformation leadership paradigm transcend organizational boundaries? American Psychologist, vol. 52, no.2, 1997, pp.130-139.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bass & Stogdill The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, & managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press, 1990.
10 J. Chen and C. Silverthorne, Leadership effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from ProQuest, 2005.
11 F. E. Fiedler, A contingency model of leadership, effectiveness, in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, (1), 1964
12 R. K. Greenleaf, The servant as leader. In Kouzes, J. (2003). Business leadership: A Jossey-Bass reader (pp. 117-136). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1977.
13 W. Hill, A situational approach to leadership effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 53, no.6, 1969, pp.513-517.   DOI
14 A. Nahavandi, The art and science of leadership (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
15 B. J. Avolio, F. J. Yammarino, Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. San Diego, CA: Emerald, 2002.
16 Pearson Education, Inc. How good am I at building and leading a team [Online self-assessment]? Pearson Prentice-Hall Self-assessment library. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
17 Bruce W. Tuckman, Development Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin vol.63, no.6, 1995.