Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.1100

Factors Influencing Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Elective Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Study  

Aiyer, Siddharth Narasimhan (Department of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital)
Kumar, Ajit (Department of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital)
Shetty, Ajoy Prasad (Department of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital)
Kanna, Rishi Mugesh (Department of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital)
Rajasekaran, Shanmuganath (Department of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital)
Publication Information
Asian Spine Journal / v.12, no.6, 2018 , pp. 1100-1105 More about this Journal
Abstract
Study Design: Prospective observational study. Purpose: To determine the incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar spine surgery and identify the risk factors associated with the development of POUR. Overview of Literature: POUR following surgery can lead to detrusor dysfunction, urinary tract infections, prolonged hospital stay, and a higher treatment cost; however, the risk factors for POUR in spine surgery remain unclear. Methods: A prospective, consecutive analysis was conducted on patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar surgery in the form of lumbar discectomy, lumbar decompression, and single-level lumbar fusions during a 6-month period. Patients with spine trauma, preoperative neurological deficit, previous urinary disturbance/symptoms, multiple-level fusion, and preoperative catheterization were excluded from the study. Potential patient- and surgery-dependent risk factors for the development of POUR were assessed. Univariate analysis and a multiple logistical regression analysis were performed. Results: A total of 687 patients underwent posterior lumbar spine surgery during the study period; among these, 370 patients were included in the final analysis. Sixty-one patients developed POUR, with an incidence of 16.48%. Significant risk factors for POUR were older age, higher body mass index (BMI), surgery duration, intraoperative fluid administration, lumbar fusion versus discectomy/decompression, and higher postoperative pain scores (p<0.05 for all). Sex, diabetes, and the type of inhalational agent used during anesthesia were not significantly associated with POUR. Multiple logistical regression analysis, including age, BMI, surgery duration, intraoperative fluid administration, fusion surgery, and postoperative pain scores demonstrated a predictive value of 92% for the study population and 97% for the POUR group. Conclusions: POUR was associated with older age, higher BMI, longer surgery duration, a larger volume of intraoperative fluid administration, and higher postoperative pain scores. The contribution of postoperative pain scores in the multiple regression analysis was a significant predictor of POUR.
Keywords
Urinary retention; Postoperative complications; Spinal fusion; Urinary catheterization; Risk factors;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F. Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1139-57.   DOI
2 Fernandez MA, Karthikeyan S, Wyse M, Foguet P. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014;96:462-5.   DOI
3 Lingaraj K, Ruben M, Chan YH, Das SD. Identification of risk factors for urinary retention following total knee arthroplasty: a Singapore hospital experience. Singapore Med J 2007;48:213-6.
4 Oishi CS, Williams VJ, Hanson PB, Schneider JE, Colwell CW Jr, Walker RH. Perioperative bladder management after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:732-6.   DOI
5 O'Riordan JA, Hopkins PM, Ravenscroft A, Stevens JD. Patient-controlled analgesia and urinary retention following lower limb joint replacement: prospective audit and logistic regression analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000;17:431-5.   DOI
6 Sung KH, Lee KM, Chung CY, et al. What are the risk factors associated with urinary retention after orthopaedic surgery? Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:613216.
7 Jung HJ, Park JB, Kong CG, Kim YY, Park J, Kim JB. Postoperative urinary retention following anterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative cervical disc diseases. Clin Orthop Surg 2013;5:134-7.   DOI
8 Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Sogawa N, et al. Postoperative urinary retention after surgery for benign anorectal disease: potential risk factors and strategy for prevention. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006;21:676-82.   DOI
9 Altschul D, Kobets A, Nakhla J, et al. Postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2017;26:229-34.   DOI
10 Gandhi SD, Patel SA, Maltenfort M, et al. Patient and surgical factors associated with postoperative urinary retention after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:1905-9.   DOI
11 Boulis NM, Mian FS, Rodriguez D, Cho E, Hoff JT. Urinary retention following routine neurosurgical spine procedures. Surg Neurol 2001;55:23-7.   DOI
12 Hollman F, Wolterbeek N, Veen R. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in men undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2015;38:e507-11.   DOI
13 Wald HL, Ma A, Bratzler DW, Kramer AM. Indwelling urinary catheter use in the postoperative period: analysis of the national surgical infection prevention project data. Arch Surg 2008;143:551-7.   DOI
14 David TS, Vrahas MS. Perioperative lower urinary tract infections and deep sepsis in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8:66-74.   DOI
15 Greig JD, Mahadaven M, John TG, Garden OJ. Comparison of manual and ultrasonographic evaluation of bladder size in patients prior to laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1996;10:432-3.   DOI
16 Griffiths CJ, Murray A, Ramsden PD. Accuracy and repeatability of bladder volume measurement using ultrasonic imaging. J Urol 1986;136:808-12.   DOI
17 Lamonerie L, Marret E, Deleuze A, Lembert N, Dupont M, Bonnet F. Prevalence of postoperative bladder distension and urinary retention detected by ultrasound measurement. Br J Anaesth 2004;92:544-6.   DOI