Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14773/cst.2014.13.2.41

Corrosion Behaviors of Structural Materialsin High Temperature S-CO2 Environments  

Lee, Ho Jung (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST)
Kim, Hyunmyung (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST)
Jang, Changheui (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST)
Publication Information
Corrosion Science and Technology / v.13, no.2, 2014 , pp. 41-47 More about this Journal
Abstract
The isothermal corrosion tests of several types of stainless steels, Ni-based alloys, and ferritic-martensitic steels (FMS) were carried out at the temperature of 550 and $650^{\circ}C$ in SFR S-$CO_2$ environment (200 bar) for 1000 h. The weight gain was greater in the order of FMSs, stainless steels, and Ni-based alloys. For the FMSs (Fe-based with low Cr content), a thick outer Fe oxide, a middle (Fe,Cr)-rich oxide, and an inner (Cr,Fe)-rich oxide were formed. They showed significant weight gains at both 550 and $650^{\circ}C$. In the case of austenitic stainless steels (Fe-based) such as SS 316H and 316LN (18 wt.% Cr), the corrosion resistance was dependent on test temperatures except SS 310S (25 wt.% Cr). After corrosion test at $650^{\circ}C$, a large increase in weight gain was observed with the formation of outer thick Fe oxide and inner (Cr,Fe)-rich oxide. However, at $550^{\circ}C$, a thin Cr-rich oxide was mainly developed along with partially distributed small and nodular shaped Fe oxides. Meanwhile, for the Ni-based alloys (16-28 wt.% Cr), a very thin Cr-rich oxide was developed at both test temperatures. The superior corrosion resistance of high Cr or Ni-based alloys in the high temperature S-$CO_2$ environment was attributed to the formation of thin Cr-rich oxide on the surface of the materials.
Keywords
super-critical $CO_2$; stainless steel; weight gain; corrosion resistance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 S. Kihara, A. Ohtomo, I. Kajigaya, F. Kishimoto, Materials and Corrosion, 39, 69 (1988).   DOI
2 M. Anderson, Project Report of Nuclear Energy University Program 09-778, University of Wisconsin (2012).
3 Y. I. Chang, P. J. Finck, C. Grandy, Argonne National Laboratory report ANL-ABR-1 (ANL-AFCL-173) (2006).
4 V. Dostal M.J. Driscoll, P. Hejzlar, MIT Annual and Progress Reports, MIT-ANP-TR-100 (2004).
5 D. J. Beech, R. May, OECD Proceedings, the First Information Exchange Meeting on Basic Studies on High-Temperature Engineering, Paris, France (1999).
6 G. Cao, V. Firouzdor, K. Sridharan, M. Anderson, T.R. Allen, Corros. Sci., 60, 246 (2012).   DOI   ScienceOn
7 F. Rouillard, F. Charton, G. Moine, Supercritical $CO_2$ Power Cycle Symposium, April 29-30, Troy, NY (2009).
8 T. Furukawa, Y. Inagaki, M. Aritomi, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 53, 1050 (2011).   DOI   ScienceOn
9 K. Sridharan, M. Anderson, G. Cao, J. Jelinek, V. Firouzdor, T.R. Allen, Supercritical $CO_2$ Power Cycle Symposium, May 24-25, Boulder, Colorado (2011).