Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14773/cst.2011.10.4.131

Study on the Hydrogen Delayed Fracture Property of TRIP Steel by Slow Strain Rate Testing Method  

Cho, J.H. (Department of Display Materials Engineering, Soonchunhyang University)
Lee, J.K. (Department of Display Materials Engineering, Soonchunhyang University)
Publication Information
Corrosion Science and Technology / v.10, no.4, 2011 , pp. 131-135 More about this Journal
Abstract
The demands of high-strength steel have been steadily increased to reduce the weight of vehicles. Although the TRIP steel has been the promising candidate material for the purpose, high strength hinders the application due to the susceptibility to hydrogen delayed fracture in the corrosive environment. Moreover, the testing method was not specified in the ISO standards. In this work, the test method to evaluate the susceptibility of hydrogen delayed fracture was studied by slow strain rate testing technique. The four test experimental parameters were studied : strain rate, hydrogen charging time, holding time after hydrogen charging, and holding time after cadmium plating. The steel was fractured by hydrogen in case the strain rate was in the range of $1{\times}10^{-4}{\sim}5{\times}10^{-7}/sec$. It was confirmed that the slow strain rate test is effective method to evaluate the susceptibility to hydrogen delayed fracture. The holding time over 24 hrs after hydrogen charging, nullified the hydrogen effect, that is, the specimen was no more susceptible to hydrogen after 24 hrs even though the specimen was fully hydrogen-charged. Moreover, cadmium electroplating could not prevent from diffusing out the hydrogen from the steel in the experiment. The effective experimental procedures were discussed.
Keywords
TRIP steel; hydrogen delayed fracture; hydrogen embrittlement; testing method; slow strain rate test; cadmium plating;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 O. Grassel, L. Kruger, G. Frommeyer, and L. W. Meyer, Int. J. Plast., 16, 1391 (2000).   DOI   ScienceOn
2 G. Frommeyer, U. Brux, and P. Neumann, ISIJ Int., 43, 438 (2003).   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Dong Bin Im, Chang Gil Lee, Sung Joon Kim, and Ik Min Park, J. Korea Inst. Met & Mater, 40, 8 (2002).
4 J. F. Lessar and W. W. Gerberich, Metall. Trans. A, 7A, 953 (1976).
5 M. Nagumo, ISIJ Int., 41, 590 (2001).   DOI   ScienceOn
6 M. R. Louthan, G. R. Caskey, J. A. Donovan, and D. E. Rawl, Mater. Sci. Eng., 10, 357 (1972).
7 J. P. Hirth, Metall. Trans. A, 11A, 861 (1980).
8 N. R. Moody, S. L. Robinson, and W. M. Garrison Jr., Res. Mec., 30, 143 (1990).
9 W. Y. Choo and J. Y. Lee, Metall. Trans. A, 13A, 135 (1982).
10 Sung Joon Kim, Trends in Metals and Materials Engineering, 16, 103 (2003).
11 E. Gold and T. J. Koppenaal, ASM Trans., 62, 607 (1969).
12 R. A. McCoy and W. W. Gerberich, Metall. Trans., 4, 539 (1973).   DOI
13 Q. Yang and J. L. Luo, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 288, 75 (2000).   DOI   ScienceOn
14 L. Zhang, M. Wen, M. Imade, S. Fukuyama, and K. Yokogawa, Acta Mater., 56, 3414 (2008).   DOI   ScienceOn