Browse > Article

Development of an Integrity Evaluation Program for Corroded City Gas Pipelines  

Shim, D.J. (SAFE Research Center, Sungkyunkwan University)
Yun, K.O. (SAFE Research Center, Sungkyunkwan University)
Choi, J.B. (SAFE Research Center, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, Y.J. (SAFE Research Center, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, W.S. (SAFE Research Center, Sungkyunkwan University)
Choi, S.C. (SAFE Research Center, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Corrosion Science and Technology / v.4, no.4, 2005 , pp. 164-170 More about this Journal
Abstract
Pipelines have the highest capacity and are the safest and the least environmentally disruptive means for transmitting gas or oil. Recently, failures due to corrosion defects have become a major concern in maintaining pipeline integrity. A number of solutions have been developed for the assessment of remaining strength of corroded pipelines. In this paper, a Fitness-For-Purpose(FFP) type limit load solution for corroded city gas pipelines is proposed. For this purpose, a series of burst tests with various types of machined defects were performed. Finite element simulations were carried out to derive an appropriate failure criterion. Based on such solution along with existing solutions, an integrity evaluation program for corroded city gas pipeline, COPAP-CITY, has been developed.
Keywords
corrosion defect; city gas pipeline; burst test; finite element analysis; integrity evaluation program;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 American National Standards Institute(ANSI)/American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines, ASME B31G, (1984)
2 DNV, Corroded Pipelines - Recommended Practice RP-F101, Det Norske Veritas, Norway, 1999
3 P. H. Vieth and J. F. Kiefner, RSTENG User's Manual, Pipeline Research Supervisory Committee, American Gas Association, (1993)
4 D. R. Stephens and B. N. Leis, 'Material and Geometry Factors Controlling the Failure of Corrosion Defects in Piping,' ASME Pressure Vesselsand Piping Conference, Orlando, (1997)
5 K. E. W. Coulson and R. G. Worthingham, 'Standard Damage-Assessment Approach is Overly Conservative,' Oil and Gas Journal, (1990)
6 Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc, ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual, Ver. 5.8, (1998)
7 J. F. Kiefner and P. H. Vieth, 'A Modified Criterion for Evaluating the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipe,' Final Report on Project PR 3-805, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, (1989)
8 P. Hopkins and D. G. Jones, 'A Study of the Behavior ofLong and Complex-Shaped Corrosion in Transmission Pipelines,' British Gas pic, OMAE-92-1004, (1992)
9 D. R. Stephens, B. N. Leis, J. D. Kurre, and D. L. Rudland, 'Development of an Alternative Failure Criterion for Residual Strength of Corrosion Defects in Moderate- to High- Toughness Pipe,' Battelle report to PRC International Report, A.G.A. Catalog Number L51794, (1999)
10 D. S. Cronin and R. J. Pick, 'Experimental Database for Corroded Pipe: Evaluation of RSTRENG and B31G,' Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, 2, p.757-768 (2000)
11 P. H. Vieth and J. F. Kiefner, 'Database of Corroded Pipe Tests,' Final Report on Contract No. PR 218-9206, Kiefner and Associates, Inc, (1994)
12 Office of Pipeline Safety, U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline Statistics, http://ops.dot.gov/stats.htm, (2001)
13 D. S. Cronin and R. J. Pick, 'A New Multi-Level Assessment Procedure for Corroded Line Pipe,' Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, 2, p.801-808 (2000)
14 P. Hopkins, 'Transmission Pipelines: How to Improve the Integrity and Prevent Failures,' Proceedings of the 2nd International Pipeline Conference, Vol.1, Ostend, Belgium, p.683-706 (1995)