Browse > Article

Inability of Mate and Species Recognition by Male Asian Toads, Bufo gargarizans  

Cheong, Seok-Wan (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
Sung, Ha-Cheol (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
Park, Shi-Ryong (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Animal cells and systems / v.12, no.2, 2008 , pp. 93-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
In recent years, we frequently observed missmatched pairs between male Asian toads, Bufo gargarizans, and bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana, at the toad breeding ponds, where scramble competition for mating occurred among the male toads. Thus, we performed two-choice experiments to investigate recognition ability of mates and species in male toads. The test males did not discriminate sexes, but the clasped stimulus males immediately produced release calls and stopped it while the clasped stimulus female did not. In addition, the test male toads did not discriminate reproductive state of females and even species. However, male toads chose larger individuals. The present results indicate that the main reason of missmatched amplexus by the male toads is due to 1) the lack of recognition cues of conspecifics, 2) the lack of communication tools like release calls, and 3) the larger size of bullfrogs than male toads themselves.
Keywords
Asian Toad; Bufo gargarizans; two-choice experiment; bullfrog; Rana catesbeiana; recognition cue; release call;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
1 ARAK A (1983) Male-male competition and mate choice in anuran amphibians. In: P. Bateson (ed), Mate Choice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 181-210
2 Arak A (1988) Sexual size dimorphism in body size: a model and a test. Evolution 42: 820-825   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Arntzen JW (1999) Sexual selection and male mate choice in the common toad, Bufo bufo. Ethol Ecol Evol 11: 407-414   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: P. Bateson (ed), Mate choice, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 3-52
5 Kang EJ and Youn CH (1994). The settlement and distribution of the introduced bullfrog, Raja catesbeiana, in Korea. nature conservation report 13: 231-250
6 Marco A, Kesecker JM, Chivers DP, and Blaustein AR (1998) Sex recognition and mate choice by male western toads, Bufo boreas. Anim Behav 55: 1631-1635   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Olson DH (1989) The ecological and behavioral dynamics of breeding in three sympatric anuran amphibians. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University
8 Sherman PW, Reeve HK, and Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR and Davis NB (eds.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford, Blackwell, pp 69-96
9 Sullivan BK (1983) Sexual selection in Wood house's toad (Bufo woodhousei). II. Female choice. Anim Behav 31: 1011-1017   DOI
10 Wells KD (1988) The effect of social interactions on anuran vocal behavior. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, and Walkowiak W (eds), The Evolution of the Amphibian Ear, New York, John Wiley, pp 433-454
11 Yang SY, Kim JB, Min MS, Suh JH, and Kang YJ (2001) Korean amphibians. Academic Press
12 Ryan MJ (1990) Sensory systems, sexual selection, and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 7: 157-195
13 Davies NB and Halliday TR (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274: 683-685   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Gerhardt HC (1991) Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav 42: 615-636   DOI
15 Duellman WE and Pyles RA (1983) Acoustic resource partitioning in anuran communities. Copeia 1983: 639-649   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Endler JA (1993) Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Phil Tran R Soc London B 340: 215-225   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lande R and Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Davies NM and Halliday TR (1977) Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo. Nature 269: 56-58   DOI
19 Sung HC, Park OH, Kim SK, Park DS, and Park SR (2007) Abundance and breeding migration of the Asian Toad (Bufo gargarizans). J Ecol Field Biol 30: 287-292   과학기술학회마을   DOI
20 Kang YS and Yoon IB (1975) Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea Vol 17 Amphibia'Reptila. The Korean ministry of education. Seoul
21 Schneider H, Sofianidou TS, and Kyriakopoulou-Sklavounou (1984) Bioacoustic and morphometric studies of water frogs (genus Rana) of Lake Ioannina in Greece, and description of a new species (Anura, Amphibia). J Zool Syst Evolut-forsch. 22: 349-366   DOI
22 Hoglund J and Robertson JG M (1987) Random mating by size in a population of common toads (Bufo bufo). Amphibia-Reptilia 8: 321-330   DOI
23 Duellman WE and Trueb L (1994) Biology of Amphibians. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
24 Ryan MJ (1985) The Tungara Frogs: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago and London
25 Schwartz JJ (1989). Graded aggressive calls of the spring peeper, Pseudacris crucifer. Herpetologica 45: 172-181