Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/BKMS.b180055

TREES WITH EQUAL STRONG ROMAN DOMINATION NUMBER AND ROMAN DOMINATION NUMBER  

Chen, Xue-Gang (Department of Mathematics North China Electric Power University)
Sohn, Moo Young (Department of Mathematics Changwon National University)
Publication Information
Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society / v.56, no.1, 2019 , pp. 31-44 More about this Journal
Abstract
A graph theoretical model called Roman domination in graphs originates from the historical background that any undefended place (with no legions) of the Roman Empire must be protected by a stronger neighbor place (having two legions). It is applicable to military and commercial decision-making problems. A Roman dominating function for a graph G = (V, E) is a function $f:V{\rightarrow}\{0,1,2\}$ such that every vertex v with f(v)=0 has at least a neighbor w in G for which f(w)=2. The Roman domination number of a graph is the minimum weight ${\sum}_{v{\in}V}\;f(v)$ of a Roman dominating function. In order to deal a problem of a Roman domination-type defensive strategy under multiple simultaneous attacks, ${\acute{A}}lvarez$-Ruiz et al. [1] initiated the study of a new parameter related to Roman dominating function, which is called strong Roman domination. ${\acute{A}}lvarez$-Ruiz et al. posed the following problem: Characterize the graphs G with equal strong Roman domination number and Roman domination number. In this paper, we construct a family of trees. We prove that for a tree, its strong Roman dominance number and Roman dominance number are equal if and only if the tree belongs to this family of trees.
Keywords
Roman domination number; strong Roman domination number; tree;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 M. P. Alvarez-Ruiz, T. Mediavilla-Gradolph, and S. M. Sheikholeslami, On the strong Roman domination number of graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 231 (2017), 44-59.   DOI
2 E. J. Cockayne, P. M. Dreyer Sr., S. M. Hedetniemi, and S. T. Hedetniemi, Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004), no. 1-3, 11-22.   DOI
3 C. S. ReVelle and K. E. Rosing, Defendens imperium romanum: a classical problem in military strategy, Amer. Math. Monthly 107 (2000), no. 7, 585-594.   DOI
4 L. Stewart, Defend the roman empire!, Sci. Amer. 281 (1999), no. 6, 136-139.   DOI